Partial volume effect (PVE) on the arterial input function (AIF) in T 1-weighted perfusion imaging and limitations of the multiplicative rescaling approach

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1055-1059

  Hansen, Adam E ^a   Pedersen, Henrik ^a   Rostrup, Egill ^a   Larsson, Henrik B W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Arterial input function; Bolus tracking; Cerebral blood flow; Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; Partial volume effect; Quantitative perfusion imaging

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; HEMODYNAMICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI; PARTIAL VOLUME EFFECT; PERFUSION IMAGING;

FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING;

ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN BLOOD VOLUME; BRAIN TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING;

EID: 70349620611     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22098     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barbier EL, Lamalle L, Décorps M. Methodology of brain perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:496-520.
2. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Quantification of perfusion using bolus tracking magnetic resonance imaging in stroke. Stroke 2002;33:1146-1151.
3. van Osch MJP, Vonken EPA, Viergever MA, van der Grond J, Bakker CJG. Measuring the arterial input function with gradient echo sequences. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:1067-1076.
4. Chen JJ, Smith MR, Frayne R. The impact of partial-volume effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:390-399. (Pubitemid 41298327)
5. Duhamel G, Schlaug G, Alsop DC. Measurement of arterial input functions for dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging using echoplanar images: comparison of physical simulations with in vivo results. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:514-523. (Pubitemid 43352549)
6. Wirestam R, Ryding E, Lindgren A, Geijer B, Holtås S, Ståhlberg F. Absolute cerebral blood flow measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: a direct comparison with Xe-133 SPECT. MAGMA 2000;11:96-103.
7. Rausch M, Scheffler K, Rudin M, Radü EW. Analysis of input functions from different arterial branches with gamma variate functions and cluster analysis for quantitative blood volume measurements. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:1235-1243. (Pubitemid 32121439)
8. van Osch MJ, Vonken EJ, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Correcting partial volume artifacts of the arterial input function in quantitative cerebral perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:477-485.
9. Jochimsen TH, Newbould RD, Skare ST, Clayton DB, Albers GW, Moseley ME, Bammer R. Identifying systematic errors in quantitative dynamic-susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging by high-resolution multi-echo parallel EPI. NMR Biomed 2007; 20: 429-438.
10. Vonken EPA, van Osch MJ, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Measurement of cerebral perfusion with dual-echo multi-slice quantitative dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:109-117.
11. Calamante F. Bolus dispersion issues related to the quantification of perfusion MRI data. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:718-722. (Pubitemid 41741236)
12. Alsop DC, Wedmid A, Schlaug G. Defining a local input function for perfusion quantification with bolus contrast MRI. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2002 (Abstract 659).
13. 2O positron emission tomography in humans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998;18:935-940.
14. Harrer JU, Parker GJM, Haroon HA, Buckley DL, Embelton K, Roberts C, Balériaux D, Jackson A. Comparative study of methods for determining vascular permeability and blood volume in human gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:748-757. (Pubitemid 39426068)
15. Mouridsen K, Christensen S, Gyldensted L, Østergaard. Automatic selection of arterial input function using cluster analysis. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:524-531.
16. Knutsson L, Börjesson S, Larsson EM, Risberg J, Gustafson L, Passant U, Ståhlberg F, Wirestam R. Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow in normal volunteers: correlation between Xe-133 SPECT and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:913-920. (Pubitemid 47548151)
17. Zaharchuk G, Bammer R, Straka M, Newbould RD, Olivot JM, Mlynash M, Lansberg MG, Albers GW, Moseley ME. Defining a local input function for perfusion quantification with bolus contrast MRI. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2008 (Abstract 628).
18. Lin W, Celik A, Derdeyn C, An H, Lee Y, Videen T, Østergaard L, Powers WJ. Quantitative measurements of cerebral blood flow in patients with unilateral carotid artery occlusion: a PET and MR study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:659-667.
19. Shin W, Horowitz S, Ragin A, Chen Y, Walker M, Carroll TJ. Quantitative cerebral perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: evaluation of reproducibility and age- and gender-dependence with fully automatic image postprocessing algorithm. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1232-1241. (Pubitemid 350234210)
20. Larsson HBW, Hansen AE, Berg HK, Rostrup E, Haraldseth O. Dynamic contrast-enhanced quantitative perfusion measurement of the brain using T1-weighted MRI at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:754-762.
21. Kiselev VG. On the theoretical basis of perfusion measurements by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:1113-1122.
22. de Bazelaire C, Rofsky NM, Duhamel G, Zhang J, Michaelson MD, George D, Alsop DC. Combined T2* and T1 measurements for improved perfusion and permeability studies in high field using dynamic contrast enhancement. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2083-2091. (Pubitemid 44193193)
23. Kellman P, Aletras AH, Hsu L, McVeigh ER, Arai AE. T2* measurement during first-pass contrast-enhanced cardiac perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:1132-1134. (Pubitemid 44691357)