Impact of preoperative breast MRIs on timing of surgery and type of intervention in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 17, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2010, Pages

  Angarita, Fernando A ^a   Acuna, Sergio A ^b   Fonseca, Adriana ^c   Crystal, Pavel ^b   Escallon, Jaime ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^b MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST CANCER; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 78149244703     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1239-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. LJ Dummin M Cox L Plant 2007 Prediction of breast tumor size by mammography and sonography-a breast screen experience Breast 16 38 46 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s%2FntVSktg%3D%3D 10.1016/j.breast.2006.04.003 16846736
2. K Heusinger C Lohberg MP Lux, et al. 2005 Assessment of breast cancer tumor size depends on method, histopathology and tumor size itself Breast Cancer Res Treat 94 17 23 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrjslOrtw%3D%3D 10.1007/s10549-005-6653-x 16142441
3. MD Lagios PR Westdahl MR Rose 1981 The concept and implications of multicentricity in breast carcinoma Pathol annu 16 Pt 2 83 102 1:STN:280:DyaL387is1Gjtg%3D%3D 6276850
4. R Holland SHJ Veling M Mravunc, et al. 1985 Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas: implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery Cancer 56 979 990 1:STN:280:DyaL2M3lsVentA%3D%3D 10.1002/1097-0142(19850901)56:5<979::AID-CNCR2820560502>3.0.CO;2-N 2990668
5. JS Vaidya JJ Vyas RF Chinoy, et al. 1996 Multicentricity of breast cancer: whole-organ analysis and clinical implications Br J Cancer 74 820 824 1:STN:280:DyaK28zovVWrtQ%3D%3D 8795588
6. JM Kurtz J Jacquemier R Amatric, et al. 1990 Breast conserving therapy for macroscopically multiple cancer Ann Surg 212 38 44 1:STN:280: DyaK3czgtlSgsw%3D%3D 10.1097/00000658-199007000-00006 2363602
7. LD Wilson M Beinfield CF McKhan, et al. 1993 Conservative surgery and radiation in treatment of synchronous ipsilateral breast cancers Cancer 72 137 142 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3osVGlsQ%3D%3D 10.1002/1097-0142(19930701)72:1<137::AID- CNCR2820720126>3.0.CO;2-E 8389664
8. L Esserman N Hylton L Yassa, et al. 1999 Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging J Clin Oncol 17 110 119 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzosFCjtA%3D%3D 10458224
9. U Fischer O Zachariae F Baum, et al. 2004 The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer Eur Radiol 14 1725 1731 15248080
10. F Sardanelli GM Giuseppetti P Panizza, et al. 2004 Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the wholebreast pathologic examination as a gold standard AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 1149 1157 15385322
11. E Deurloo JL Deterse E Rutgers, et al. 2005 Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerized analysis Eur J Cancer 41 1393 1401 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.017 15913987
12. U Fischer F Baum S Luftner-Nagel 2006 Preoperative MR imaging in patients with breast cancer: preoperative staging, effects on recurrence rates, and outcome analysis Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14 351 362 10.1016/j.mric.2006.07. 009 17098176
13. CD Lehman C Gatsonis CK Kuhl, et al. 2007 MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer N Engl J Med 356 1295 1303 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjsFGht70%3D 10.1056/NEJMoa065447 17392300
14. M Van Goethem K Schelfout L Dijckmans, et al. 2004 MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: comparison with mammography and ultrasound Eur Radiol 14 809 816 10.1007/s00330-003-2146-7 14615904
15. M Tozaki E Fukuma N Kawano, et al. 2008 Bilateral breast MR imaging: is it superior to conventional methods for the detection of contralateral breast cancer? Breast Cancer 15 169 174 10.1007/s12282-007-0025-9 18317885
16. N Houssami S Ciatto P Macaskill, et al. 2008 Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer J Clin Oncol 26 3248 3258 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2108 18474876
17. L Liberman EA Morris CM Kim, et al. 2003 MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer AJR Am J Roentgenl 180 333 341
18. SG Lee SG Orel IJ Woo, et al. 2003 MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results Radiology 226 773 778 10.1148/radiol.2263020041 12601182
19. ACR practice guideline for the performance of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. 2002, amended 2006, revised 2008 (Res 19), pp 561-7. Available at: http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/ quality-safety/guidelines/dx/head-neck/mr-spectroscopy.aspx. Accessed August 17, 2009.
20. TB Bevers BO Anderson E Bonaccio, et al. 2009 NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer screening and diagnosis J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7 1060 1096 19930975
21. RJ Bleicher RM Ciocca BL Egleston, et al. 2009 Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status J Am Coll Surg 209 180 187 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.010 19632594
22. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. About wait times data. Available at: http://www.health.gov.on.ca/transformation/wait-times/providers/ wt-data.html#1. Accessed August 17, 2009.
23. Canadian Society for Surgical Oncology. CSSO position statement. 2009. Available at: http://www.cos.ca/csso/. Accessed August 17, 2009.
24. CD Lehman W DeMartini BO Anderson, et al. 2009 Indications for breast MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer J Natl Compr Canc Netw 792 193 201
25. CK Kuhl HB Bieling J Gieseke, et al. 1997 Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrastenhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency Radiology 203 137 144 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3jt1CisQ%3D%3D 9122382
26. M Muller-Schimpfle K Ohmenhauser P Stoll, et al. 1997 Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast Radiology 203 145 149 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3jt1Citg%3D%3D 9122383
27. I Bedrosian R Mick SG Orel, et al. 2003 Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging Cancer 98 468 473 10.1002/cncr.11490 12879462
28. F Sardanelli 2010 Overview of the role of pre-operative breast MRI in the absence of evidence on patient outcomes Breast 19 3 6 10.1016/j.breast.2009.11. 003 20159456
29. M Krishnan D Thorsteinsson N Horowitz, et al. 2008 The influence of preoperative MRI in the timing and type of therapy in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer AJR Am J Roentgenol 190 A31 A34
30. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. MRI and CT expert panel phase I report. 2005. Available at: http://www.health.gov.on.ca/transformation/ wait-times/providers/reports/mri-ct.pdf. Accessed August 17, 2009.
31. MA Richards AM Westcombe SB Love, et al. 1999 Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review Lancet 353 1119 1126 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3isVKrsg%3D%3D 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02143-1 10209974
32. K Colbert 1994 The longer the delay, the greater the anxiety. Delay in treatment for breast cancer Prof Nurse 9 517 520 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3nvVSjsg%3D%3D 8008764
33. AB Hollingsworth RG Stough 2006 Preoperative breast MRI for locoregional staging J Okla State Med Assoc 99 505 515 17125104
34. MD Schnall J Blume DA Bluemke, et al. 2005 MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883 J Surg Oncol 92 32 38 10.1002/jso.20381 16180227
35. U Fischer L Kopka E Grabbe 1999 Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach Radiology 213 881 888 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fls1OnsQ%3D%3D 10580970
36. CD Lehman JD Blume D Thickman, et al. 2005 Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trial J Surg Oncol 92 9 15 10.1002/jso.20350 16180217
37. M Morrow 2004 Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: primum non nocere J Am Coll Surg 198 240 241 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.013 14759781
38. L Turnbull S Brown I Harvey, et al. 2010 Comparative Effectiveness of MRI in Breast Cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial Lancet 375 528 530 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62070-5
39. M Clemons S Danson T Hamilton, et al. 2001 Locoregionally recurrent breast cancer: incidence, risk factors and survival Cancer Treat Rev 27 67 82 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3jtFCitA%3D%3D 10.1053/ctrv.2000.0204 11319846
40. R Punglia M Morrow E Winer, et al. 2007 Local therapy and survival in breast cancer N Engl J Med 356 2399 2405 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmt1Wntrg%3D 10.1056/NEJMra065241 17554121
41. L Liberman EA Morris DD Dershaw, et al. 2003 MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer AJR Am J Roentgenol 180 901 910 12646427
42. HI Lim JH Choi JH Yan, et al. 2010 Does pre-operative breast magnetic resonance imaging in addition to mammography and breast ultrasonography change the operative management of breast carcinoma? Breast Cancer Res Treat 119 163 167 10.1007/s10549-009-0525-8 19760039
43. KY Bilimoria A Cambic NM Hansen, et al. 2007 Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers Arch Surg 142 441 445 10.1001/archsurg.142.5.441 17515485
44. WA Berg L Gutierrez MS NessAiver, et al. 2004 Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, linical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer Radiology 233 830 849 10.1148/radiol.2333031484 15486214
45. FH Bagley 2004 The role of magnetic resonance imaging mammography in the surgical management of the index breast cancer Arch Surg 139 380 383 10.1001/archsurg.139.4.380 15078704
46. Y Zhang H Fukatsu S Naganawa, et al. 2002 The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery Breast Cancer 9 231 239 10.1007/BF02967595 12185335
47. SG Orel MD Schnall CM Powell, et al. 1995 Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy Radiology 196 115 122 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzgsVSisw%3D%3D 7784554