Prediction of breast tumor size by mammography and sonography-A breast screen experience

Breast

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 38-46

  Dummin, L J ^a   Cox, M ^a   Plant, L ^a  

^a BreastScreen South Australia   (Australia)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast screening; Cancer staging; Linear regression; Preoperative measurement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 33846620587     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2006.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Boyle P. Mammographic breast cancer screening: after the dust has settled. Breast 12 (2003) 351-356
2. Tabar L., Smith R.A., Vitak B., Yen M.F., Chen H.H., Warwick J., et al. Mammographic Screening: a key factor in the control of breast cancer. Cancer J 9 (2003) 15-27
3. National Health and Medical Research Council. Clinical practice guidelines: The management of early breast cancer (2001), Stone Press, Eastwood, NSW p. 44-50
4. Kirkland Ruffin W., and Wood W.C. The role of surgery for early breast cancer. In: Ariel I.M., and Cohan A.C. (Eds). Treatment of precancerous lesions and early breast cancer (1994), Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore 76-83
5. Sainsbury J.R.C., Anderson T.J., and Morgan D.A.L. Breast cancer. In: Dixon M. (Ed). ABC of breast diseases. 2nd ed (2000), GraphyCems, Navarra, Spain
6. Philpotts L., Lee C., Horvath L., Lange R., Carter D., and Tocino I. Underestimation of breast cancer with 11 gauge vacuum suction biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 175 (2000) 1047-1050
7. Stavros A.T. Breast ultrasound (2004), Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, USA pp vii, 125-6, 465, 470
8. Yang W.T., Lam W.W.M., Cheung H., Suen M., King W.W.K., and Metreweli C. Sonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and mammographic assessments of preoperative size of breast cancer. J Ultras Med 16 12 (1997) 791-797
9. Pierie J.P., Perre C.I., Levert L.M., and de Hooge P. Clinical assessment, mammography and ultrasonography as methods of measuring the size of breast cancer: a comparison. Breast 7 (1998) 247-250
10. Hieken T.J., Harrison J., Herreros J., and Velasco J.M. Correlating sonography, mammography, and pathology in the assessment of breast cancer size. Am J Surg 182 4 (2001) 351-354
11. Bosch A.M., Kessels A., Beets G.L., Rupa D.K., von Engelshoven J., and von Meyenfeldt M.F. Preoperative estimation of pathological breast tumor size by physical examination, mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study on 105 invasive tumors. Eur J Radiol 48 (2003) 285-292
12. Golshan B., Fung B.B., Wiley E., Wolfman J., Rademaker A., and Morrow M. Prediction of breast cancer size by ultrasound, mammography and core biopsy. Breast 13 (2004) 265-271
13. Allen S.A., Cunliffe W.J., Gray J., et al. Pre-operative estimation of primary breast cancer size: a comparison of clinical assessment, mammography and ultrasound. Breast 10 4 (2001) 299-305
14. Tresserra F., Feu J., Grases P.J., Navarro B., Alegret X., and Fernandez-Cid A. Assessment of breast cancer size: sonographic and pathologic correlation. J Clinl Ultrasound 27 9 (1999) 485-491
15. Pritt B., Ashikago T., Oppenheimer R., and Weaver D. Influence of breast cancer histology on the relationship between ultrasound and pathology tumor size measurements. Mod Pathol 17 (2004) 905-910
16. Tan S.B., Wee S.B., and Cheung Y.B. Agreement or prediction: asking and answering the right question. Ann Acad Med Singapore 31 3 (2002) 405-407
17. Breast Screen Australia, National Quality Management Committee. National accreditation standards. 2nd ed (2004), Commonwealth of Australia Printing Press, Australia p. 149-68
18. Flanagan F.L., Mcdermott M.B., Barton P.T., et al. Invasive breast cancer-mammographic measurement. Radiology 3 (1996) 819-823
19. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BIRADS). 3rd ed (1998), American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
20. Australian Cancer Network. The pathology reporting of breast cancer. 2nd ed (2001), Intramed Educational Publishing, Sydney p. 20-1
21. 3. J Ultras Med 9 10 (1989) 559-568
22. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. The national breast cancer audit (2005), ASERNIPS, Stepney, South Australia p. 3
23. Smitt M.C., Nowels K.W., Zdeblick M.J., et al. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long term results of breast conservation. Cancer 76 (1995) 259-267
24. Morimoto T., Okazaki K., Sasa M., et al. Cancerous residue in breast conserving surgery. J Surg Oncol 52 2 (1993) 71-76