Potential Margin Distortion in Breast Tissue by Specimen Mammography

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 138, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1371-1374

  Clingan, Rodney ^a   Griffin, Michael ^a   Phillips, John ^a   Coberly, William ^b   Jennings, William C ^a,c  

^a University of Oklahoma Tulsa College of Medicine   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

^c St John East Building ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TECHNIQUE;

BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPECIMEN HANDLING;

EID: 0345060515     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1371     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin. 2000;50:7-33.
2. International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference. Image-detected breast cancer: state of the art diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193:297-302.
3. TranSpec Specimen Radiography Device [package insert]. Long Island, NY: E-Z-M Inc; 1993.
4. Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy [review]. Am J Surg. 2002;184:383-393.
5. Schnitt SJ, Abner A, Gelman R, et al. The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer. 1994;74:1746-1751.
6. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Groshen S, et al. The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1455-1461.
7. Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, et al. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2000;179:81-85.
8. Bimston DN, Bebb GG, Wagman LD. Is specimen mammography beneficial? Arch Surg. 2000;135:1083-1086; discussion, 1086-1089.
9. Graham RA, Homer MJ, Sigler CJ, et al. The efficacy of specimen radiography in evaluating the surgical margins of impalpable breast carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:33-36.
10. Homer MJ, Berlin L. Radiography of the surgical breast biopsy specimen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1197-1199.
11. Spivack B, Khanna MM, Tafra L, Juillard G, Giuliano AE. Margin status and local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Arch Surg. 1994;129:952-956; discussion, 956-957.
12. Mokbel K, Choy C, Leris C, et al. Predictors of positive margins after local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Surg. 2001;181:91-95.
13. Fortin A, Larochelle M, Laverdiere J, Lavertu S, Tremblay D. Local failure is responsible for the decrease in survival for patients with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:101-109.
14. Whelan T, Clark R, Roberts R, Levine M, Foster G. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence postlumpectomy is predictive of subsequent mortality: results from a randomized trial. Investigators of the Ontario Clinical Oncology group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;30:11-16.
15. Vicini FA, Kestin LL, Goldstein NS, et al. Relationship between excision volume, margin status, and tumor size with the development of local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving therapy. J Surg Oncol. 2001;76:245-254.
16. Hasselgren P, Hummel RP, Georgian-Smith D, Fieler M. Breast biopsy with needle localization: accuracy of specimen x-ray and management of missed lesions. Surgery. 1993;114:836-840; discussion, 840-842.
17. Lagios M. Pathology procedures for evaluation of the specimen with potential or documented ductal carcinoma in situ. Semin Breast Dis. 2000;3:42-49.
18. Graham RA, Homer MJ, Katz J, Rothschild J, Safaii H, Supran S. The pancake phenomenon contributes to the inaccuracy of margin assessment in patients with breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2002;184:89-93.