Building confidence: An exploration of nurses undertaking a postgraduate biological science course

Contemporary Nurse

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 26-34

  Van Wissen, Kim ^a   McBride Henry, Karen ^b  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Biological sciences; Education; Nursing; Postgraduate; Theory guided practice

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOMEDICINE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; NEW ZEALAND; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STUDENT; NURSING THEORY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE DISCIPLINES; COMMUNICATION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; NEW ZEALAND; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING THEORY; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF EFFICACY; STUDENTS, NURSING;

EID: 78049419484     PISSN: 10376178     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5172/conu.2010.35.1.026     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Akinsanya JA (1984) Development of nursing knowledge base in life sciences: Problems and prospects. International Journal of Nursing Studies 21(3), 221-227.
2. Akinsanya JA (1987) The life sciences in nursing: Development of a theoretical model. Journal of Advanced Nursing 12(3), 267-274.
3. Akinsanya JA and Hayward JC (1980) The biological sciences in nursing education: The contribution of bionursing. Nursing Times 76, 427-432.
4. Caon M and Treagust D (1993) Why do some nursing students find their science courses difficult? Journal of Nursing Education 32(6), 255-259.
5. Casey G (1996) Analysis of Akinsanya's model of bionursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 23, 1065-1070.
6. Clancy J, McVicar A and Bird D (2000) Getting it right? An exploration of issues relating to the biological sciences in nurse education and nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32(6), 1522-1532.
7. Courtenay M (1991) A study of the teaching and learning of the biological sciences in nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing 16, 1110-1116.
8. Davies S, Murphy F and Jordan S (2000) Bioscience in the pre-registration curriculum: Finding the right teaching strategy. Nurse Education Today 20, 123-135.
9. Gardner G, Gardner A and Procotor M (2004) Nurse practitioner education: A research-based curriculum structure. Journal of Advanced Nursing 47(2), 143-152.
10. Hewison A and Wildman S (1996) The theory-practice gap in nursing: A new dimension. Journal of Advanced Nursing 24, 754-761.
11. Jordan S (1998) From classroom theory to clinical practice: Evaluating the impact of a post-registration course. Nurse Education Today 18, 293-302.
12. Jordan S, Davies S and Green B (1999) The biosciences in the preregistration nursing curriculum: Staff and students' perceptions of difficulties and relevance. Nurse Education Today 19, 215-226.
13. Jordan S and Hughes D (1998) Using bioscience knowledge in nursing: Actions, interactions and reactions. Journal of Advanced Nursing 27, 1060-1068.
14. Jordan S and Potter N (1999) Biosciences on the margin. Nursing Standard 13(25), 46-48.
15. Jordan S and Reid K (1997) The biological sciences in nursing: An empirical paper reporting on the applications of physiology to nursing care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 26, 169-179.
16. Landers M (2000) The theory-practice gap in nursing: The role of the nurse teacher. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32(6), 1550-1556.
17. McVicar A (2009) A post-registration solution to the bioscience problem? British Journal of Nursing 18(3), 149 (editorial).
18. Mitchell GJ and Bournes DA (2006) Challenging the theoretical production of nursing knowledge: A response to Reed and Rolfe's column. Nursing Science Quarterly 19(2), 116-119.
19. Nicol MJ (2002) The teaching of genetics in New Zealand undergraduate nursing programmes. Nurse Education Today 22, 401-408.
20. Nicol MJ (2003) The variation of response to pharmacotherapy: Pharmacogenetics - a new perspective to, the right drug for the right person. MEDSURG Nursing 12(4), 242-249.
21. Nicol N (1999) Whither nursing in the 21st century? Kai Tiaki Nursing New Zealand 5(2), 24-26.
22. Nicoll L and Butler M (1996) The study of biology as a cause of anxiety in student nurses undertaking the common foundation programme. Journal of Advanced Nursing 24, 615-624.
23. Pope C, Ziebland S and Mays N (2000) Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal 320(7227), 114-116.
24. Prows CA, Glass M, Nicol MJ, Skirton H and Williams J (2005) Genomics in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 37(3), 196-202.
25. Reed P and Rolfe G (2006) Nursing knowledge and nurses' knowledge: A reply to Mitchell and Bournes. Nursing Science Quarterly 19(2), 120-122.
26. Reed PG (2006) The dialogue within nursing theory-guided practice: A frontier of knowledge development. Nursing Science Quarterly 19(4), 328-329.
27. Rolfe G (1997) Beyond expertise: Theory, practice and the reflexive practitioner. Journal of Clinical Nursing 6, 93-97.
28. Seymour B, Kinn S and Sutherland N (2003) Valuing both critical and creative thinking in clinical practice: Narrowing the research-practice gap? Journal of Advanced Nursing 42(3), 288-296.
29. Thornton T (1997) Attitudes towards the relevance of biological, behavioural and social sciences in nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing 26, 180-186.
30. Torrance C and Jordan S (1995) Bionursing: Putting science into practice. Nursing Standard 9, 25-27.
31. Trnobranski PH (1993) Biological sciences and the nursing curriculum: A challenge for educationalists. Journal of Advanced Nursing 18, 493-499.