The gatehouses and mansions: Fifty years later

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volumn 6, Issue , 2010, Pages 323-339

  Leo, Richard A ^a   Koenig, K Alexa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Confessions; Constitution; Interrogation; Miranda; Police; Rights

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049417620     PISSN: 15503585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102209-152938     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Ainsworth JE. 1998 (1993). In a different register: the pragmatics of powerlessness in police interrogation. See Leo & Thomas 1998, pp. 283-296
2. Arenella P. 1997. Miranda stories. Harvard J. Public Policy 20:375
3. Baker L. 1983. Miranda: Crime, Law and Politics. New York: Atheneum
4. Berger M. 1988. Compromise and continuity: Miranda waivers, confession admissibility, and the retention of interrogation protections. Univ. Pitt. Law Rev. 49:1007
5. Berghuis v. Thompkins, 130 S. Ct. 2250 (2010)
6. Berk-Seligson S. 2009. Coerced Confessions: The Discourse of Bilingual Police Interrogations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
7. California v. Beheler, 463 U.S. 1121 (1983)
8. Cassell PG. 1998 (1996). Miranda's social costs: an empirical reassessment. See Leo&Thomas 1998, pp. 175- 190
9. Cassell PG, Fowles R. 1998. Handcuffing the cops? A thirty-year perspective on Miranda's harmful effects on law enforcement. Stanford Law Rev. 50:1055-1145
10. Cassell PG, Hayman BS. 1996. Police interrogation in the 1990s: an empirical study of the effects of Miranda. U.C.L.A. Law Rev. 43:839
11. Cloud M, Shepherd GB, Barkoff AN, Shur JV. 2002. Words without meaning: the Constitution: confessions, and mentally retarded suspects. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 69:495
12. Cooper VG, Zapf PA. 2008. Psychiatric patients' comprehension of Miranda rights. Law Hum. Behav. 32:390
13. Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994)
14. Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000)
15. Donohue J. 1998. Did Miranda diminish police effectiveness? Stanford Law Rev. 50:1147
16. Einesman F. 1999. Confessions and culture: the interaction of Miranda and diversity. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 90:1
17. Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964)
18. Feeney F. 2000. Police clearances: a poor way to measure the impact of Miranda on police. Rutgers Law Rev. 32:1
19. Feld BC. 2006. Police interrogation of juveniles: an empirical study of police and practice. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 97:219
20. Fulero SM, Everington C. 2004. Mental retardation, competency to waive Miranda rights, and false confessions. In Interrogations, Confessions, and Entrapment, ed. GD Lassiter, pp. 163-179 New York: Kluwer Acad.
21. Garcia A. 1998. Is Miranda dead, was it overruled, or is it irrelevant? St. Thomas Law Rev. 10:461-505
22. Graham F. 1970. The Self-Inflicted Wound. New York: MacMillan
23. Grisso T. 1980. Juveniles' capacities to waive Miranda rights: an empirical analysis. Calif. Law Rev. 68:1134
24. Gross SF, Jacoby K, Matheson DJ, Montgomery N, Patil S. 2005. Exonerations in the United States, 1989 through 2003. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 95:523
25. Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222 (1971)
26. Herman L. 1987. The Supreme Court, the Attorney General, and the good old days of police interrogation. Ohio St. Law Rev. 48:732
27. Inbau FE, Reid JE, Buckley JP, Jayne B. 2001. Criminal Interrogation and Confessions.Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen
28. Kamisar Y. 1965. Equal justice in the gatehouses and mansions of American criminal procedure: From Powell to Gideon, FromEscobedo to . . . . In Criminal Justice in Our Time, ed. A Howard, pp. 3-95. Charlottesville, Virginia: Univ. Press Virginia
29. Kamisar Y. 2001. Miranda thirty-five years later: a close look at the majority and dissenting opinions in Dickerson. Ariz. St. Law J. 33:387
30. Kamisar Y. 2007. On the fortieth anniversary of the Miranda case: why we needed it, how we got it-and what happened. Ohio St. J. Crim. Law 5:163
31. Kassin SM, Drizin ST, Grisso T, Gudjonsson GH, Leo RA, Redlich AD. 2010. Police-induced confessions: risk factors and recommendations. Law. Hum. Behav. 34:3-38
32. Leo RA. 1996. The impact of Miranda revisited. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 86:621
33. Leo RA. 1998. Miranda and the problem of false confessions. See Leo & Thomas 1998, pp. 271-282
34. Leo RA. 2001. Questioning the relevance of Miranda in the twenty-first century. Mich. Law Rev. 99:1000
35. Leo RA. 2008. Police Interrogation and American Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
36. Leo RA, Ofshe RJ. 1998. Using the innocent to scapegoat Miranda: another reply to Paul Cassell. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 88:557
37. Leo RA, Ofshe RJ. 2001. The truth about false confessions and advocacy scholarship. Crim. Law Bull. 37:293-370
38. Leo RA, Thomas GC. 1998. The Miranda Debate: Law, Justice, and Policing. Boston: Northeast. Univ. Press
39. LeoRA, White WS. 1999. Adapting to Miranda:modern interrogators' strategies for dealingwith the obstacles posed by Miranda. Minn. Law Rev. 84:397
40. Michigan v. Tucker, 417 U.S. 422 (1974)
41. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
42. New Jersey v. Portash, 440 U.S. 450 (1979)
43. New York v. Quarles, 467 U.S. 649 (1984)
44. North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369 (1979)
45. Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 (1985)
46. Ofshe RJ, Leo RL. 1997. The decision to confess falsely: rational choice and irrational action. Denver Univ. Law Rev. 74:979
47. Owen-Kostelnik J, Reppucci ND,Meyer J. 2006. Testimony and interrogation of minors: assumptions about maturity and morality. Am. Psychol. 61:286
48. Rogers R, Correa AA, Hazelwood LL, ShumanDW,HoerstingRC, Blackwood HL.2009. Spanish translations of Miranda warnings and the totality of the circumstances. Law Hum. Behav. 33:61-69
49. Rogers R, Harrison KS, Shuman DW, Sewell KW, Hazelwood LL. 2007. An analysis of Miranda warnings and waivers: comprehension and coverage. Law Hum. Behav. 31:177
50. Rogers R, Hazelwood LL, Sewell KW, Harrison KS, Shuman DW. 2008. The language of Miranda warnings in American jurisdictions: a replication and vocabulary analysis. Law Hum. Behav. 32:124
51. Schulhofer SJ. 1981. Confessions and the Court. Mich. Law Rev. 79:862
52. Schulhofer SJ. 1987. Reconsidering Miranda. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 54:435
53. Schulhfoer SJ. 1996. Miranda and clearance rates. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 91:278
54. Schulhofer SJ. 1997. Bashing Miranda is unjustified-and harmful. Harvard J. Law Public Policy 20:347
55. Schulhofer SJ. 1998 (1996). Miranda's practical effect: substantial benefits and vanishingly small social costs. See Leo & Thomas 1998, pp. 191-207
56. Schulhofer SJ. 2006. Miranda v. Arizona: a modest but important legacy. In Criminal Procedure Stories, ed. C Steiker, pp. 155-179. New York: Foundation
57. Simon D. 1991. Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
58. Slobogin C. 2003. Toward taping. Ohio St. J. Crim. Law 1:309
59. Strauss M. 2007. Understanding Davis v. United States. Loyola L. A. Law Rev. 40:1011
60. Stuntz WJ. 2001. Miranda's mistake. Mich. Law Rev. 99:975
61. Thomas GC. 1996. Telling half-truths. Legal Times, Aug. 12, pp. 20-24
62. Thomas GC. 1998 (1996). Plain talk about the Miranda empirical debate: a steady-state theory of confessions. See Leo & Thomas 1998, pp. 236-248
63. Thomas GC. 2000. The end of the road for Miranda v. Arizona? On the history and future of rules for police interrogation. Am. Crim. Law Rev. 37:1-39
64. Thomas GC. 2001. Separated at birth but siblings nonetheless: Miranda and the due process notice cases. Mich. Law Rev. 99:1081
65. Thomas GC. 2004. Stories about Miranda. Mich. Law Rev. 102:1959
66. Thomas GC, Leo RA. 2002. The effects of Miranda v. Arizona: "embedded" in our culture. Crime Justice Rev. Res. 29:203-271
67. United States v. Patane, 542 U.S. 630 (2004)
68. Viljoen JL, Zapf PA, Roesch R. 2007. Adjudicative competence and comprehension of Miranda rights in adolescent defendants: a comparison of legal standards. Behav. Sci. Law 25:1
69. Weisberg B. 1961. Police interrogation of arrested persons: a skeptical view. In Police Power and Individual Freedom, ed. CR Sowell, pp. 153-181 Chicago: Aldine
70. Weisselberg CD. 1998. Saving Miranda. Cornell Law Rev. 84:109
71. Weisselberg CD. 2008. Mourning Miranda. Calif. Law Rev. 96:1521
72. White WW. 1998. What is an involuntary confession now? Rutgers Law Rev. 50:2001
73. White WW. 2001. Miranda's Waning Protections: Police Interrogation Practices after Dickerson. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
74. White WW. 2003-2004. Yale Kamisar-the enemy of injustice. Mich. Law Rev. 102:1775
75. Wrightsman LS, Pitman ML. 2010. The Miranda Ruling: Its Past, Present and Future. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
76. Young D. 1996. Unnecessary evil: police lying in interrogations. Conn. Law Rev. 28:425