Spanish translations of Miranda warnings and the totality of the circumstances

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 61-69

  Rogers, Richard ^a   Correa, Amor A ^a   Hazelwood, Lisa L ^a   Shuman, Daniel W ^b   Hoersting, Raquel C ^a   Blackwood, Hayley L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^b Southern Methodist University   (United States)

Author keywords

Miranda; Self incrimination; Spanish translation; Waivers

Indexed keywords

HUMAN RIGHTS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PRISONERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 58849156091     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10979-008-9129-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Accessibility Institute (2007). TxReadability Project: The development of a multi-language readability tool. Austin: University of Texas. Accessed 30 Sept 2007 via http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/research/summary/ readability.html.
2. Becker, S. A. (2003). Definition of readability statistics. Web-based materials from Northern Arizona University accessed on September 30, 2007 via http://cob.fit.edu/facultysites/abecker/Accessibility/ReadMeTool/ ReadMeStatistics.html.
3. California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. 355 (1981).
4. Crowle, J. C. (2006, February). Barriers to understanding Miranda. California Association for Criminal Justice, Monterey Beach.
5. Duckworth v. Eagan, 492 U.S. 195 (1989).
6. J. Fernández Huerta 1959 Medidas sencillas de lecturabilidad [Simple measurement for readability] Consigna 214 29 32
7. R. Flesch 1948 A new readability yardstick Journal of Applied Psychology 32 221 233
8. James, D. J., & Glaze, L. E. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Bureau of Justice Statistics (NCJ213600). The pdf file was accessed on September 29, 2007 via http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/mhppji. htm.
9. M. B. Johnson L. Torres 1992 Miranda, trial competency and Hispanic immigrant defendants American Journal of Forensic Psychology 10 65 80
10. S. M. Kassin R. A. Leo C. A. Meissner K. D. Richma L. H. Colwell A. M. Leach 2007 Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs Law and Human Behavior 31 381 400
11. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
12. R. Rogers K. S. Harrison L. L. Hazelwood K. W. Sewell 2007 Knowing and intelligent: A study of Miranda warnings in mentally disordered defendants Law and Human Behavior 31 401 418
13. R. Rogers K. S. Harrison D. W. Shuman K. W. Sewell L. L. Hazelwood 2007 An analysis of Miranda warnings and waivers: Comprehension and coverage Law and Human Behavior 31 177 192
14. R. Rogers L. L. Hazelwood K. S. Harrison K. W. Sewell D. W. Shuman 2007 The language of Miranda warnings in American jurisdictions: A replication and vocabulary analysis Law and Human Behavior 32 124 136
15. Rogers, R., & Shuman, D. W. (2005). Miranda and beyond: Competencies related to police investigations. In R. Rogers & D. W. Shuman (Eds.), Fundamentals of forensic practice: Mental health and criminal law (pp. 113-149). New York: Springer.
16. Sabol, W. J., Minton, T. D., & Harrison, P. M. (2007). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2006. Bureau of Justice Statistics (NCJ217675). Accessed 29 Sept 2007 at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/pjim06.pdf.
17. Shin, H. B., & Bruno, R. (2003). Language use and English-speaking ability: 2000. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau. Accessed 6 Oct 2007 via http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-29.pdf.
18. State v. Ortez, 178 N.C. App.236, 631 S.E.2d 188 (N.C.App. 2006).
19. State v. Ramirez 135 Ohio App.3d 89, 732 N.E.2d 1065 (1999).
20. State v. Santiago, 206 Wis.2d 3, 556 N.W.2d 687 (1996).
21. U.S. v. Colima-Monge, 962 F.Supp. 1323 (D.Or. 1997).
22. United States v. Perez-Lopez, 348 F.3d 839 (9th Cir. 2003).