The Miranda Ruling: Its Past, Present, and Future

The Miranda Ruling: Its Past, Present, and Future

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-208

  Wrightsman, Lawrence S ^a   Pitman, Mary L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Confessions, defendants' rights; Fifth amendment rights; Miranda rights; Miranda v. arizona; Miranda warnings; Police interrogation; Right to remain silent; Sixth amendment rights; Supreme court

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049444335     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730902.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (282)

1. Anderson v. Terhune, U.S. App. Lexis 2755 (9th Cir. Nov. 5, 2006).
2. Arizona v. Fulminante, 111 S.Ct. 1246 (1991).
3. Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 322 U.S. 193 (1944).
4. Baker, L. (1983). Miranda: Crime, law and politics. New York: Atheneum.
5. Barthel, J. (1976). A death in Canaan. New York: E. P. Dutton.
6. Bedau, H. A., & Radelet, M. L. (1987). Miscarriages of justice in potentially capital cases. Stanford Law Review, 41, 21-79.
7. Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455 (1942).
8. Black, H. L., Jr. (1995). Hugo Black. In C. Cushman (Ed.), The Supreme Court justices:Illustrated biographies, 1784-1995 (2nd ed., pp. 376-380). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
9. Blackburn v. Alabama, 361 U.S. 199 (1960).
10. Bouton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968).
11. Bram v. United States, 168 U.S. 532 (1897).
12. Brief of the American Medical Association et al. as Amici Curiae in support of Respondent, Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) (No. 03-633).
13. Briere, E. J. (1978, September). Limited English speakers and the Miranda rights. TESOL Quarterly, 12(3), 235-245.
14. Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
15. Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 (1936).
16. Buckley, J. P. (2007, September). What is the Reid Technique? Conference on Interrogations and Confessions, University of Texas at El Paso.
17. Bull, R. (1989). Can training enhance the detection of deception? In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 83-99). New York: Kluwer Academic Press/Plenum Publishers.
18. Burt, R. A. (1969). Miranda and Title II: A Morganatic marriage? In P. B. Kurland (Ed.), Supreme Court Review 1969 (pp. 81-139). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. California v. Beheler, 463 U.S. 1121 (1983).
20. California v. Dorado, 40 Cal. Rptr.264, 394 P.2nd 952 (1965).
21. California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. 355 (1981).
22. Carey, B. (2009, May 12). Judging honesty by words, not fidgets. New York Times, pp. D1, D4.
23. Cassell, P. G. (1996a). All benefits, no costs: The grand illusion of Miranda defenders. Northwestern University Law Review, 90, 1084-1124.
24. Cassell, P. G. (1996b). Miranda's social costs: An empirical reassessment. Northwestern University Law Review, 90, 387-499.
25. Cassell, P. G. (1998). Protecting the innocent from false confessions and lost confessions- and from Miranda. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78, 497-556.
26. Cassell, P. G. (1999a). The guilty and the innocent: An examination of the alleged cases of wrongful conviction from false confessions. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 22, 23-603.
27. Cassell, P. G. (1999b). The statute that time forgot: 18 USC 3501 and the overhauling of Miranda. Iowa Law Review, 85, 175-259.
28. Cassell, P. G., & Fowles, R. (1998). Handcuffing the cops? A thirty-year perspective on Miranda's harmful effects on law enforcement. Stanford Law Review, 50, 1055-1146.
29. Cassell, P. G., & Hayman, B. S. (1996). Police interrogation in the 1990s: An empirical study of the effects of Miranda. UCLA Law Review, 43, 839-931.
30. Chambers v. Florida, 309 U.S. 727 (1940).
31. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967).
32. Chavez v. Martinez, 538 U.S. 760 (2003).
33. Clymer, S. D. (2002). Are police free to disregard Miranda? Yale Law Journal, 112, 447-552.
34. Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986).
35. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. DiGiambattista, 442 Mass. 423 (2004).
36. Connecticut v. Barrett, 479 U.S. 523 (1987).
37. Connery, D. S. (1977). Guilty until proven innocent. New York: Putnam.
38. Cooper, V. G., & Zapf, P. A. (2007). Psychiatric patients' comprehension of Miranda rights. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 390-405.
39. Cooper, V. G., & Zapf, P. A. (2008, March). Shhh! Miranda (mis)comprehension in the general populace. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychology-Law Society, Jacksonville, FL.
40. Corriero, M. A. (2006). Judging children as children: A proposal for a juvenile justice system. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
41. Costanzo, M., & Leo, R. A. (2007). Research and expert testimony on interrogations and confessions. In M. Costanzo, D. Krauss, & K. Pedzek (Eds.), Expert psychological testimony for the courts (pp. 69-98). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683 (1986).
43. Cruz v. New York, 481 U.S. 186 (1987).
44. Culombe v. Connecticut, 367 U.S. 568 (1961).
45. Curtis, N. (2006, May 15). Language assistance for law enforcement. National Association of Judiciary Interpreters and Translators, NAJIT Position Paper.
46. Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994).
47. DeClue, G. (2005). Interrogations and disputed confessions: A manual for forensic psychological practice. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
48. Deeley, P. (1971). Beyond the breaking point. London: Arthur Backer.
49. Deitch, M., Barstow, A., Lukens, L., & Reyna, R. (2009). From timeout to hard time: Young children in the adult criminal justice system. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin, LBJ School of Public Affairs.
50. DePaulo, B. (1994). Spotting lies: Can humans learn to do better? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 83-86.
51. Dershowitz, A. M. (2008). Is there a right to remain silent? Coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11. New York: Oxford University Press.
52. Dickerson v. United States, 120 S.Ct. 2326, 530 U.S. 428 (2000).
53. Donohoe, J. J., III. (1998). Did Miranda diminish police effectiveness? Stanford Law Review, 50, 1147-1180.
54. Dorsciak v. Gladden, 246 Ore. 233, 425 P.2d 177 (1967).
55. Drizin, S. A., & Colgan, B. A. (2004). Tales from the juvenile confession front. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 127-162). New York:Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
56. DuBow, S., Geer, S., & Strauss, K. P. (1992). Legal rights: The guide for deaf and hard of hearing people. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
57. Duckworth v. Eagan, 492 U.S. 195 (1989).
58. Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982).
59. Edkins, V. A. (2007). Assessing due process and crime control attitudes: Creation and validation of a measure of juror bias. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas.
60. Edkins, V. A., & Wrightsman, L. S. (2004). The psychology of entrapment. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 215-244). New York: Kluwer Academic Press/Plenum.
61. Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981).
62. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Frank, M. G. (1999). A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science. 10, 263-266.
63. Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964).
64. Everington, C., & Fulero, S. (1999). Competence to confess: Measuring understanding and suggestibility of defendants with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 37, 212-220.
65. Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707 (1979).
66. Feld, B. C. (2006). Juveniles' competence to exercise Miranda rights: An empirical study of policy and practice. Minnesota Law Review, 91, 26-100.
67. Fellers v. United States, 124 S.Ct. 1019 (2004).
68. Fikes v. Alabama, 352 U.S. 191 (1957).
69. Firstman, R., & Salpeter, J. (2008). A criminal injustice: A true crime, a false confession, and the fight to free Marty Tankleff. New York: Ballantine.
70. Follett, W. C., Davis, D., & Leo, R. A. (2007). Mental health status and vulnerability to police interrogation tactics. Criminal Justice, 22(3), 42-49.
71. Formanek, R., Jr. (1985, October 23). Chicago man back in jail after eluding other charges. Lawrence Journal-World, p. 30.
72. Framer, I. (2000, Summer-Fall). Interpreters and their impact on the criminal justice system: The Alejandro Ramirez case. Newsletter, Community and Court Interpreters of the Ohio Valley I, 1, 1-7.
73. Franklin, C. (1970). The third degree. London: Robert Hale.
74. Frontline. (2002). Inside the teen brain. Public Broadcasting System..
75. Frumkin, I. B. (2008, August). New norms for Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale and Grisso's Miranda tests. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
76. Fulero, S. M. (2004). Expert psychological testimony on the psychology of interrogations and confessions. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions and entrapment (pp. 247-263). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
77. Fulero, S. M. (2007, September). Tales from the front: Expert testimony on the psychology of interrogations and confessions. Conference on Interrogations and Confessions, University of Texas at El Paso.
78. Fulero, S. M. (2008, August). Case law of expert testimony regarding Miranda competency and suggestibility. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
79. Fulero, S. M. (In press). Expert psychological testimony on the psychology of interrogations and confessions: Five years later. In G. D. Lassiter & C. Meissner (Eds.), Interrogations and confessions: Current research, practices, and policy. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
80. Fulero, S. M., & Everington, C. (1995). Assessing competency to waive Miranda rights in defendants with mental retardation. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 533-543.
81. Fulero, S. M., & Everington, C. (2004). Mental retardation, competency to waive Miranda rights, and false confessions. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 163-179). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
82. Gallegos v. Colorado, 370 U.S. 49 (1962).
83. Geller, W. A. (1992). Police videotaping of suspect interrogations and confessions: A preliminary examination of issues and practices. (A report to the National Institute of Justice.) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
84. Gideon v. Wainwright, 373 U.S. 335 (1963).
85. Giedd, J. N. (2002). Inside the teen brain. Interview by Frontline, Public Broadcasting System.
86. Graham, F. P. (1970). The due process revolution: The Warren Court's impact on criminal law. Rochelle Park, NY: Hayden.
87. Grano, J. D. (1993). Confessions, truth, and the law. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
88. Greenhouse, L. (2000, June 28). A turf battle's victim. New York Times, pp. A1, A18.
89. Grisso, T. (1981). Juveniles' waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competence. New York: Plenum.
90. Grisso, T. (1998). Forensic evaluation of juveniles. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resources Press.
91. Grisso, T. (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd ed.). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
92. Grisso, T., & Ring, J. (1979). Parents' attitudes toward juveniles' rights in interrogation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 6, 221-226.
93. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984a). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 303-314.
94. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984b). Interrogative suggestibility: Comparison between "false confessors" and "deniers" in criminal trials. Medicine, Science, and the Law, 24, 56-60.
95. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1987). Historical background to suggestibility: How interrogative suggestibility differs from other types of suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 347-355.
96. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1988). Interrogative suggestibility and its relationship with assertiveness, social-evaluative anxiety, state anxiety, and method of coping. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 159-166.
97. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1989). Compliance in an interrogative situation: A new scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 535-540.
98. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1991). The application of interrogative suggestibility to police interviewing. In J. P. Schumaker (Ed.), Human suggestibility: Advances in theory, research and application (pp. 279-288). London: Routledge.
99. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1992). The psychology of interrogations, confessions, and testimony, New York: Wiley.
100. Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. New York: Wiley.
101. Gudjonsson, G. H., & Clare, I. C. H. (1995). The relationship between confabulation and intellectual ability, memory, interrogative suggestibility, and acquiescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 333-338.
102. Gudjonsson, G. H., & Hilton, M. (1989). The effects of instructional manipulation on interrogative suggestibility. Social Behaviour, 4, 189-193.
103. Hairston v. United States, 905 A.2d 765 (D.C. 2006).
104. Haley v. Ohio, 332 U.S. 596 (1948).
105. Hancock, C. (1996). Due process before Miranda. Tulane Law Review, 70, 2195-2237.
106. Hansdottir, I., Thorsteinsson, H. S., Kristinsdottir, H., & Ragnarsson, R. S. (1990). The effects of instructions and anxiety on interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 85-87.
107. Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222 (1971).
108. Hawkins v. Lynaugh, 844 F.2d 1132 (5th Cir. 1988).
109. Hopkins, E. Q. (1931). Our lawless police: A study of unlawful enforcement of the law. New York: Viking Press.
110. Hopt v. Territory of Utah, 110 U.S. 524 (1884).
111. Hutchinson, D. J. (1995). Byron R. White. In C. Cushman (Ed.), The Supreme Court justices: Illustrated biographies, 1789-1995 (pp. 461-466). Washington, DC:Congressional Quarterly.
112. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967).
113. Inbau, F. E., & Reid, J. E. (1962). Criminal interrogation and confessions. Baltimore, MD:Williams and Wilkins.
114. Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions (4th ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
115. Irons, P., & Guitton, S. (Eds.). (1993). May it please the Court. New York: New Press.
116. Jacobson v. United States, 503 U.S. 540 (1992).
117. Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 (1964).
118. Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719 (1966).
119. Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24.
120. Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perspectives on the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79-94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
121. Kamisar, Y. (1980). Police interrogations and confessions: Essays on law and policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
122. Kamisar, Y. (1992). Escobedo v. Illinois. In K. Hall (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the Supreme Court of the United States (p. 260). New York: Oxford University Press.
123. Kamisar, Y. (1996, June 10). Miranda does not look so awesome now. Legal Times, p. A22.
124. Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221-233.
125. Kassin, S. M. (2007, September). Why innocents confess and why confessions trump their innocence. Conference on Interrogations and Confessions, University of Texas at El Paso.
126. Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. D. (2009). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. White paper, American Psychology-Law Society.
127. Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., Richman, K. D., Colwell, L. H., Leach, A. M., & LeFon, D. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 381-400.
128. Kassin, S. M., & Fong, C. T. (1999). "I'm innocent!" Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 499-516.
129. Kassin, S. M., Meissner, C. A., & Norwick, R. J. (2005). "I'd know a false confession if I saw one" A comparison study of college students and police investigators. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 211-227.
130. Kassin, S. M., & Norwick, R. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 211-221.
131. Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1981). Coerced confessions, judicial instruction, and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 489-506.
132. Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1985). Confession evidence. In S. M. Kassin & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), The psychology of evidence and trial procedures (pp. 67-94). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
133. Kelley, H. H. (1971). Attribution in social interaction. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
134. Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966).
135. Kleinmuntz, B., & Szucko, J. J. (1984). Lie detection in ancient and modern times: A call for contemporary scientific study. American Psychologist, 39, 766-776.
136. Konecni, V. J., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1986). Courtroom testimony by psychologists in eyewitness identification issues: Critical notes and reflections. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 117-126.
137. Kujovich, G. (1995). Potter Stewart. In C. Cushman (Ed.), The Supreme Court justices:Illustrated biographies, 1789-1995 (pp. 456-460). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
138. Lassiter, G. D. (In press). Videotaping police interrogations: Dos and don'ts. In G. D. Lassiter and C. Meissner (Eds.), Interrogations and confessions: Research, practices, and policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
139. Lassiter, G. D., Beers, M. J., Geers, A. L., Handley, I. M., Munhall, P. J., & Weiland, P. E. (2002). Further evidence for a robust point-of-view bias in videotaped confessions. Current Psychology, 21, 265-288.
140. Lassiter, C. D., & Geers, A. L. (2004). Bias and accuracy in the evaluation of confession evidence. In C. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 197-234). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
141. Lassiter, G. D., & Irvine, A. A. (1986). Videotaped confessions: The impact of camera point of view on judgments of coercion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 265-276.
142. Lassiter, G. D., Slaw, R. D., Briggs, M. A., & Scanlan, C. R. (1992). The potential for bias in videotaped confessions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1838-1851.
143. Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477 (1972).
144. Leo, R. A. (1996a). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 266-303.
145. Leo, R. A. (1996b). Miranda's revenge: Police interrogation as a confidence game. Law and Society Review, 30, 259-288.
146. Leo, R. A. (1996c). The impact of Miranda revisited. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 621-692.
147. Leo, R. A. (2001a). False confessions: Causes, consequences, and solutions. In S. D. Westervelt & J. A. Humphrey (Eds.), Wrongfully convicted: Perspectives on failed justice (pp. 36-54). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
148. Leo, R. A. (2008). Police interrogation and American justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
149. Leo, R. A., & Ofshe, R. J. (1998). The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 429-496.
150. Leo, R. A., & Thomas, G. C., III. (1998). The Miranda debate: Law, justice, and policing. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
151. Leo, R. A., & White, W. (1999). Adopting to Miranda: Modern interrogations' strategies for dealing with the obstacles posed by Miranda. Minnesota Law Review, 84, 397-472.
152. Lewin, N. (1995). John Marshall Harlan. In C. Cushman (Ed.), The Supreme Court justices: Illustrated biographies, 1789-1995 (2nd ed., pp. 441-445). Washington, DC:Congressional Quarterly.
153. Leyra v. Denno, 347 U.S. 556 (1954).
154. Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 (1965).
155. Lisenba v. California, 314 U.S. 219 (1941).
156. Lyons v. Oklahoma, 322 U.S. 596 (1944).
157. Macdonald, J. M., & Michaud, D. L. (1987). The confession: Interrogation and criminal profiles for police officers. Denver: Apache.
158. Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964).
159. Malone, P. (1986). You have the right to remain silent: Miranda after twenty years. American Scholar, 55, 367-380.
160. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).
161. Marks v. United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1976).
162. Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964).
163. McCloskey, M., & Egeth, H. E. (1983). Eyewitness identification: What can a psychologist tell a jury? American Psychologist, 38, 550-563.
164. McCormick, C. T. (1946). Some problems and developments in the admissibility of confessions. Texas Law Review, 24, 239-245.
165. Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). "He's guilty!": Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 469-480.
166. Meissner, C. A., Kassin, S. M. (2004). "You're guilty, so just confess!" Cognitive and behavioral confirmation biases in the interrogation room. In C. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 85-106). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
167. Memorandum of Agreement (Ariz. Super. Ct.) (2009), Case No. JV2008065..
168. Meyer, J. R., & Reppucci, N. D. (2007). Police practices and perceptions regarding juvenile interrogation and interrogative suggestibility. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25(6), 757-780.
169. Michigan v. Harvey, 474 U.S. 344 (1990).
170. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 435 (1966).
171. Missouri v. Seibert, 124 S.Ct. 2601 (2004).
172. Montejo v. Louisiana, United States Supreme Court, Case No. 07-1529 (2009).
173. Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412 (1986).
174. Moreno, J. A. (2005). Why the new Missouri v. Seibert bad faith police test is a terrible idea. Arizona Law Review, 47, 395-418.
175. Mosteller, R. P. (2007). Police deception before Miranda warnings: The case for per se prohibition of an entirely unjustified practice at the most critical moment. Texas Tech Law Review, 39, 1239-1274.
176. Motion to Suppress Statements & Request for Voluntariness Hearing, (Ariz. Super. Ct.) (2008), Case No. JV2008-05..
177. Mullin, C. (1989). Error of judgement: The truth about the Birmingham bombings. Dublin:Poolbeg.
178. Nakane, I. (2007). Problems in communicating the suspect's rights in interpreted police interviews. Applied Linguistics, 281, 87-112.
179. New York v. Quarles, 467 U.S. 649 (1984).
180. Notice of Change of Judge for Cause, (Ariz. Super. Ct.) (2009), Case No. JV2008-05..
181. Oberlander, L., Goldstein, N., & Goldstein, A. (2003). Competence to confess. In I. Weiner & A. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Volume 22, Forensic Psychology (pp. 335-357). New York: Wiley.
182. Ofshe, R. J., & Leo, R. A. (1997). The social psychology of police interrogation: The theory and classification of true and false confessions. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 16, 189-251.
183. O'Hara, C. E., & O'Hara, G. L. (2003). Fundamentals of criminal investigation (7th ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
184. Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 (1954).
185. Oregon v. Hass, 420 U.S. 714 (1975).
186. Oregon v. Mathiason, 429 U.S. 492 (1977).
187. Packer, H. L. (1964). Two models of the criminal process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 113, 1-68.
188. Packer, H. L. (1968). The limits of the criminal sanction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
189. Paulsen, M. G. (1954). The Fourteenth Amendment and the third degree. Stanford Law Review, 6, 411-437.
190. Paulsen, M. G. (1966). Kent v. United States: The constitutional context of juvenile cases. In P. B. Kurland (Ed.), Supreme Court Review 1966 (pp. 167-192). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
191. Payne v. Arkansas, 356 U.S. 560 (1958).
192. People v. Braggs. (2003). Docket No. 95350, Illinois Supreme Court. Modified on denial of rehearing April 15, 2004. Court/2004/default.asp.
193. People v. Hartgraves, 1 Cal. App. 3.d, 117 (1964).
194. People v. McBride. (2006). COA No. 271579, State of Michigan Court of Appeals, per curiam..open.coa.pdf.
195. People v. McBride. (2008). Order, SC: 133142, Michigan Supreme Court..
196. Perillo, J. T., & Kassin, S. M. (2009, March). To bluff or not to bluff: Stay tuned. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychology-Law Society, San Antonio, TX.
197. Porter, S., Woodworth, M., & Birt, A. R. (2000). Truth, lies, and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 643-658.
198. Prettyman, B., Jr. (1961). Death and the Supreme Court. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
199. Redlich, A. D. (2004, January). Mental illness, police interrogations, and the potential for false confessions. Law and Psychiatry, 55(1), 19-21.
200. Redlich, A.D., Silverman, M., Chen, J., & Steiner, H. (2004). The police interrogation of children and adolescents. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 107-125). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
201. Redlich, A. D., Silverman, M., & Steiner, H. (2003). Factors affecting pre-adjudicative and adjudicative competence in juveniles and young adults. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 1-17.
202. Rhode Island v. Ellis, 446 U.S. 291 (1980).
203. Ring, K. (1971). Let's get started: An appeal to what's left in psychology. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
204. Rogers v. Richmond, 365 U.S. 534 (1961).
205. Rogers, R. (2008, August). Wrongs of Miranda rights: Advances in forensic research and psychological expertise. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
206. Rogers, R., Correa, A. A., Hazelwood, L. L., Shuman, D. W., Hoersting, R. C., & Blackwood, H. L. (2009). Spanish translations of Miranda warnings and the totality of circumstances. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 61-69.
207. Rogers, R., Harrison, K. S., Hazelwood, L. L., & Sewell, K. W. (2007). Knowing and intelligent: Study of Miranda warnings in mentally disordered defendants. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 401-418.
208. Rogers, R., Harrison, K. S., Shuman, D. W., Sewell, K. W., & Hazelwood, L. L. (2007). An analysis of Miranda warnings and waivers: Comprehension and coverage. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 177-192.
209. Rogers, R., Hazelwood, L. L., Sewell, K. W., Harrison, K. S., & Shuman, D. W. (2008). The language of Miranda warnings in American jurisdictions: A replication and vocabulary analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 124-136.
210. Rogers, R., Hazelwood, L. L., Sewell, K. W., Shuman, D. W., & Blackwood, H. L. (2008) The comprehensibility and content of juvenile Miranda warnings. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14(1), 63-87.
211. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).
212. Rowland, C. K., & Carp, R. A. (1996). Politics and judgment in federal district courts. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
213. Rutledge, D. (2006, October). There is no magic formula, but there are four necessary ingredients. Police Magazine,.
214. Sauer, M., & Wilkens, J. (1999, May 11). Haunting questions: The Stephanie Crowe murder case. Part 1: The night she was killed. The San Diego Union Tribune, A-1.
215. Sauer, M., & Wilkens, J. (1999, May 12). Haunting questions: The Stephanie Crowe murder case. Part 2: The arrest. The San Diego Union Tribune, A-1.
216. Sauer, M., & Wilkens, J. (1999, May 13). Haunting questions: The Stephanie Crowe murder case. Part 3: The knife. The San Diego Union Tribune, A-1.
217. Sauer, M., & Wilkens, J. (1999, May 14). Haunting questions: The Stephanie Crowe murder case. Part 4: More arrests. The San Diego Union Tribune, A-1.
218. Sawyer, D. (News Anchor). (2008, November 19). Good Morning America [Television Broadcast]. New York: American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
219. Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2001). Actual innocence. New York: Doubleday.
220. Schulhofer, S. J. (1996a). Miranda and clearance rates. Northwestern University Law Review, 91, 278-294.
221. Schulhofer, S. J. (1996b). Miranda's practical effect: Substantial benefits and vanishingly small social costs. Northwestern University Law Review, 90, 500-564.
222. Schulhofer, S. J. (1999, March 1). Miranda now on endangered species list. National Law Journal, p. A22.
223. Schulhofer, S. J. (2006). Miranda v. Arizona: A modest but important legacy. In C. S. Steiker (Ed.), Criminal procedure stories (pp. 155-179). New York: Foundation Press.
224. Schwartz, B. (1995). Earl Warren. In C. Cushman (Ed.), The Supreme Court justices:Illustrated biographies, 1789-1995 (2nd ed., pp. 436-440). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
225. Simon, D. (1991). Homicide: A year on the killing streets. New York: Ivy Books.
226. Slobogin, C. (2003). Toward taping. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 1, 309-322.
227. Smith v. Delaware, No. 43, 2006 (Sup. Ct. Del)..
228. Smith v. United States, 348 U.S. 147 (1954).
229. Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 National Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 93-119.
230. Spano v. New York, 306 U.S. 315 (1959).
231. Sparf and Hansen v. United States, 156 U.S. 51 (1895).
232. State v. Mauchley, 67 P.3d 477 (Utah 2003).
233. State v. Ramirez. (1999). Case No. 97-L-289, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh Appellate District, Lake County, 135 Ohio App. 3d 89; 732 N.R.2d 1065; 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 6241, Counsel Corrected November 20, 2000.
234. Stein v. New York, 346 U.S. 156 (1953).
235. Stephens, O. H., Jr. (1973). The Supreme Court and confessions of guilt. Knoxville:University of Tennessee Press.
236. Stone, G. R. (1978). The Miranda decision in the Burger Court. In P. B. Kurland & G. Casper (Eds.), Supreme Court Review 1977 (pp. 99-169). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
237. Stuart, G. L. (2004). Miranda: The story of America's right to remain silent. Tucson:University of Arizona Press.
238. Tankleff, M. (2009, May 22). Personal communication (transmitted by Saul M. Kassin).
239. Tanner, S. (Producer). (2007, March 10). Science of Interrogation [Television Broadcast]. Washington, DC: National Geographic Channel.
240. Thomas, G. C., III. (1996). Plain talk about the Miranda empirical debate: A "steady-state" theory of confessions. U.C.L.A. Law Review, 43, 933-959.
241. Thomas, G. C., III. (1998). The twenty-first century: A world without Miranda? In R. A. Leo & G. C. Thomas, III (Eds.), The Miranda debate: Law, justice, and policy (pp. 314-328). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
242. Thompson v. Keohane, 516 U.S. 99 (1995).
243. Thompson, S. G. (2006). Evading Miranda: How Seibert and Patane failed to "save" Miranda. Valparaiso Law Review, 40, 645-684.
244. Time Magazine. (1967, August 4). Living with Gault 90(5), p. 68.
245. Transcript of Detained Advisory Hearing and Detention Hearing. (Ariz. Super. Ct.) (2008). Case # JV2008065..
246. United States v. Bayer, 331 U.S. 532 (1947).
247. United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 (1974).
248. United States v. Gonzalez-Lauzan, 437 F.3d 1128 (11th Cir. 2006).
249. United States v. Mitchell, 322 U.S. 65 (1944).
250. United States v. Patane, 124 S.Ct. 2620 (2004).
251. United States v. Peterson, 414 F.3d 825 (7th Cir. 2005).
252. United States v. Washington, 462 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 2006).
253. Van Hook v. Anderson, No. 03-4207, 6th Circuit Court of Appeals (2007).
254. Venkatraman, B. A. (2006). Lost in translation: Limited English proficient population and the police. The Police Chief. 73(4), 40-47.
255. Vernon, M., Raifman, L. J., & Greenberg, S. F. (1996). The Miranda warnings and the deaf suspect. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 14, 124-135.
256. Vernon M., Raifman, L.J., Greenberg, S.F., & Monteiro, B. (2001). Forensic pretrial police interviews of deaf suspects: Avoiding legal pitfalls. Law and Psychiatry, 24, 43-59.
257. Viljoen, J. L., Roesch, R., & Zapf, P. A. (2002). An examination of the relationship between competency to stand trial, competency to waive interrogation rights, and psychopathology. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 481-506.
258. Vinson, F. (1961). Work of the federal courts. In W. F. Murphy & C. H. Pritchett (Eds.), Courts, judges, and politics (pp. 54-57). New York: Random House.
259. Vrij, A. (1994). The impact of information and settings on deception by police detectives. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 117-132.
260. Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. New York: Wiley.
261. Wald, M., Ayres, R., Hess, D. W., Schantz, M., & Whitebread, C. H. (1967). Interrogations in New Haven: The impact of Miranda. Yale Law Journal, 76, 1519-1648.
262. Walker, N. E., Brooks, C. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1999). Children's rights in the United States. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
263. Wallace v. Kato, 127 S.Ct. 1091 (2007).
264. Warren, E. (1977). The memoirs of Chief Justice Earl Warren. Garden City, NY:Doubleday.
265. Weiss, K. J. (2003). Confessions and expert testimony. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31, 451-458.
266. Weisselberg, C. D. (1998). Saving Miranda. Cornell Law Review, 84, 109-189.
267. Weisselberg, C. D. (2008). Mourning Miranda. California Law Review, 96, 1520-1602.
268. Wermeil, S. (1995). William J. Brennan. In C. Cushman (Ed.), The Supreme Court justices:Illustrated biographies 1789-1995 (2nd ed., pp. 446-450). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
269. Westover v. United States, petition for certiorari, No. 761 OT 1965, United States Supreme Court.
270. White, W. S. (1992). Regulating prison informers under the Due Process Clause. In D. J. Hutchinson, D. A. Strauss, & G. R. Stone (Eds.), Supreme Court Review 1991 (pp. 103-142). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
271. White, W. S. (2001a). Miranda's failure to restrain pernicious interrogation practices. Michigan Law Review, 99, 1211-1247.
272. White. W. S. (2001b). Miranda's waning protections: Police interrogation practices after Dickerson. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
273. Wickersham Commission Report. (1931). Report on lawlessness in law enforcement. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
274. Wigmore, J. H. (1970). Evidence in trials at common law (Vol. 3) (Revised by J. H. Chadbourn.) Boston: Little, Brown.
275. Willemse, C. (1931). Behind the green lights. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
276. Wrightsman, L. S. (2001). Forensic psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
277. Wrightsman. L. S. (2006). The psychology of the Supreme Court. New York: Oxford University Press.
278. Wrightsman, L. S. (2008). Oral arguments before the Supreme Court: An empirical approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
279. Wrightsman, L. S. & Kassin, S. M. (1993). Confessions in the courtroom. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
280. Yarborough v. Alvarado, 124 S.Ct. 2140 (2004).
281. Zalman, M., & Smith, B. W. (2007). The attitudes of police executives toward Miranda and interrogation policies. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97, 873-942.
282. Zelle, H., Romaine, C. L. R., Serico, J., Wolbransky, B., Osman, D., Wrazien, L., Taormina, S., & Goldstein, N. E. (2008, August). Adolescents' Miranda rights comprehension: The impact of verbal expressive abilities. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.