Self-paced study time as a cue for recall predictions across school age

British Journal of Developmental Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 767-784

  Hoffmann Biencourt, Anja ^a   Lockl, Kathrin ^b   Schneider, Wolfgang ^a   Ackerman, Rakefet ^c   Koriat, Asher ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RECALL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME;

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CUES; FEMALE; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 78049398994     PISSN: 0261510X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/026151009X479042     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ackerman, B.P. (1981). Encoding specificity in the recall of pictures and words in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 193-221.
2. Barnes, A.E., Nelson, T.O., Dunlosky, J., Mazzoni, G., & Narens, L. (1999). An integrative system of metamemory components involved in retrieval. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII - cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 287-313). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Brown, A.L., Smiley, S.S., & Lawton, S.Q.C. (1978). The effects of experience on the selection of suitable retrieval cues for studying texts. Child Development, 49, 829-835.
4. Cramer, P. (1972). A developmental study of errors in memory. Developmental Psychology, 7, 204-209.
5. Cramer, P. (1973). Evidence for a developmental shift in the basis for memory organization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 16, 12-22.
6. Dufresne, A., & Kobasigawa, A. (1989). Children's spontaneous allocation of study time: Differential and sufficient aspects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 274-296.
7. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T.O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory and Cognition, 20, 374-380.
8. Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation, and self-regulation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R.M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 297-323). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
9. Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3-14.
10. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277-287.
11. Kobasigawa, A., & Metcalf-Haggert, A. (1993). Spontaneous allocation of study time by first- and third-grade children in a simple memory task. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154, 223-235.
12. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
13. Koriat, A. (2006). Are we frightened because we run away? Some evidence from metacognitive feelings. In B. Uttl, N. Ohta, & A.L. Siegenthaler (Eds.), Memory and emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 83-103). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14. Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P.D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289-325). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Koriat, A. (2008). Easy comes, easy goes? The link between learning and remembering and its exploitation in metacognition. Memory and Cognition, 36, 416-428.
16. Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2009a). The easily learned, easily-remembered heuristic in children. Cognitive Development, 24, 169-182.
17. Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2009b). The memorizing-effort heuristic in judgments of learning: A developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 265-279.
18. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 409-517.
19. Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (1999). Processes underlying metacognitive judgments. Information-based and experience-based monitoring of one's own knowledge. In S. Chaiken & Y. Troppe (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 483-502). New York: Guilford.
20. Koriat, A., & Ma'ayan, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 478-492.
21. Koriat, A., Ma'ayan, H., & Nussinson, R. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 36-69.
22. Koriat, A., & Shitzer-Reichert, R. (2002). Metacognitive judgments and their accuracy: Insights from the processes underlying judgments of learning in children. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function, and use (pp. 1-17). New York: Kluwer.
23. Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2002a). Zur Entwicklung des selbstregulierten Lernens im Grundschulalter: Zusammenhänge zwischen Aufgabenschwierigkeit und Lernzeiteinteilung [The development of self-regulated learning in elementary school children: Associations between task difficulty and allocation of study time]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 49, 3-16.
24. Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2002b). Developmental trends in children's feeling of knowing judgements. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 327-333.
25. Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2003). Metakognitive Überwachungs- und Selbstkontrollprozesse bei der Lernzeiteinteilung von Kindern. [Metacognitive monitoring and self-control processes for children's allocation of study time]. Zeitschrift fürPädagogische Psychologie, 17, 173-183.
26. Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2004). The effects of incentives and instructions on children's allocation of study time. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 153-169.
27. Masur, E.F., McIntyre, C.W., & Flavell, J.H. (1973). Developmental changes in apportionment of study time among items in multitrial free recall task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 15, 237-246.
28. Means, B.A., & Rohwer, W.D. (1976). Attribute dominance in memory development. Developmental Psychology, 12, 411-417.
29. Metcalfe, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology: General, 131, 349-363.
30. Nelson, T.O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102-116.
31. Nelson, T.O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The 'delayed-JOL effect'. Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
32. Nelson, T.O., Dunlosky, J., Graf, A., & Narens, L. (1994). Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science, 5, 207-213.
33. Nelson, T.O., & Leonesio, R.J. (1988). Allocation of self-paced study time and the 'labor-in-vain-effect'. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 676-686.
34. Nelson, T.O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 26, pp. 125-173). New York: Academic Press.
35. Roebers, C., von der Linden, N., Howie, P., & Schneider, W. (2007). Children's metamemorial judgments in an event recall task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 117-137.
36. Schneider, W. (1998). The development of procedural memory in childhood and adolescence. In G. Mazzoni & T.O. Nelson (Eds.), Monitoring and control processes in metacognition and cognitive neuropsychology (pp. 1-21). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Schneider, W. (2010). The development of metacognitive competencies. In B. Glatzeder, V. Goel & A. von Müller (Eds.) Towards a theory of thinking: Building blocks for a conceptual framework (pp. 203-214). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
38. Schneider, W., & Bjorklund, D.F. (1998). Memory. In W. Damon, D. Kuhn, & R.S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception and language (Vol. 2, pp. 467-521). New York: Wiley.
39. Schneider, W., & Bjorklund, D.F. (2003). Memory and knowledge development. In J. Valsiner & K. Conolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 370-403). London: Sage.
40. Schneider, W., & Lockl, K. (2008). Procedural metacognition in children: Evidence for developmental trends. In J. Dunlosky & R.A. Bjork (Eds.), A handbook of memory and metamemory (pp. 391-409). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between 2 and 20. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Schneider, W., Visé, M., Lockl, K., & Nelson, T.O. (2000). Developmental trends in children's memory monitoring: Evidence from a judgment-of-learning task. Cognitive Development, 15, 115-134.
43. Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (Eds.), (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York: Guilford.
44. Son, L.K. (2005). Metacognitive control: Children's short-term versus long-term study strategies. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 347-363.
45. Son, L.K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204-221.
46. Son, L.K., & Schwartz, B.L. (2002). The relation between metacognitive monitoring and control. In T.J. Perfect & B.L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 15-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Thiede, K.W., & Anderson, M.C. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 129-160.