The use of presented and learner-generated pictures as aid for comprehension in science text learning;Der einsatz von vorgegebenen und selbst generierten bildern als textverstehenshilfe beim lernen aus einem naturwissenschaftlichen sachtext

Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 24, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 221-233

  Schwamborn, Annett ^a   Thillmann, Hubertina ^b   Leopold, Claudia ^c   Sumfleth, Elke ^a   Leutner, Detlev ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Multimedia learning; Pictures; Self regulated learning; Text comprehension

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049283854     PISSN: 10100652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652/a000018     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33, 131-151.
2. Alesandrini, K. L. (1981). Pictorial-verbal and analytic-holistic learning strategies in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 358-368.
3. Alesandrini, K. L. (1984). Pictures and adult learning. Instructional Science, 13, 63-77.
4. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5. Baumert, J., Klieme, E., Neubrand, M., Prenzel, M., Schiefele, U., Schneider, W., ⋯Weiß, M. (Hrsg.). (2001). PISA 2000. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
6. Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Feuerlein, I. & Spada, H. (2004). The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive representations. Learning and Instruction, 14, 325-341.
7. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445-457.
8. Brünken, R., Seufert, T. & Zander, S. (2005). Förderung der Kohärenzbildung beim Lernen mit multiplen Repräsentationen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19, 61-75.
9. Brünken, R., Steinbacher, S., Schnotz, W. & Leutner, D. (2001). Mentale Modelle und Effekte der Präsentations- und Abrufkodalität beim Lernen mit Multimedia. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 15, 16-27.
10. Carney, R.N. & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5-26.
11. Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
12. De Jong, T., Ainsworth, S., Dobson, M., van der Hulst, A., Levonen, J., Reimann, P. Swaak, J. (1998). Acquiring knowledge in science and mathematics. The use of multiple representations in technology-based learning environments. In M.W. van Someren, P. Reimann, H. B. A. Boshuizen & T. de Jong (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations (pp. 9-40). Kidlington: Elsevier Science.
13. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J.W. & Harman, H.H. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
14. Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C. & Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 10, 597-602.
15. Hall,V. C., Bailey, J.and Tillman, C. (1997). Can student-generated illustrations be worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 677-681.
16. Heller, K.A. & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4.-12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4-12 + R). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
17. Kozma, R. B. (2000). The use of multiple representations and the social construction of understanding in chemistry. In M. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 11-46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Kozma, R. & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 949-968.
19. Kozma, R. & Russell, J. (2005). Multimedia learning of chemistry. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 409-428). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Klauer, K. J. (1987). Kriteriumsorientierte Tests. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
21. Lenzner, A. (2009). Visuelle Wissenskommunikation: Effekte von Bildern beim Lernen. Kognitive, affektive und motivationale Effekte. Hamburg: Kovac.
22. Leopold, C. (2009). Lernstrategien und Textverstehen. Spontaner Einsatz und Förderung von Lernstrategien. Münster: Waxmann.
23. Leopold, C. and Leutner, D. (2002). Der Einsatz von Lernstrategien in einer konkreten Lernsituation bei Schülern unterschiedlicher Jahrgangsstufen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 45 (Beiheft), 240-258.
24. Lesgold, A. M., DeGood, H. & Levin, J.R. (1977). Pictures and young children's prose learning: A supplementary report. Journal of Reading Behavior, 9, 353-360.
25. Lesgold, A. M., Levin, J. R., Shimron, J. & Guttman, J. (1975). Pictures and young children's learning from oral prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 636-642.
26. Leutner, D., Leopold, C. & den Elzen-Rump, V. (2007). Self-regulated learning with a text-highlighting strategy: A training experiment. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 215, 174-182.
27. Leutner, D., Leopold, C. & Sumfleth, E. (2009). Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 284-289.
28. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31-48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2. Ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F. & Hall, R.H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 71-86.
31. Plass, J. L., Chun, D., Mayer, R.E. & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visualizer and verbalizer learning preferences in a second language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 25-36.
32. Rasco, R.W., Tennyson, R.D. & Boutwell, R. C. (1975). Imagery instructions and drawings in learning prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 188-192.
33. Rheinberg, F. (2000). Motivation (3. Aufl.). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
34. Rheinberg, F. (2004). Motivationsdiagnostik. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
35. Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R. & Burns, B. D. (2001). FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen. Diagnostica, 47, 57-66.
36. Rode, C. (1999, August). Secondary school students' diagrammatic literacy: Competencies and deficits. Paper presented at the 8th EARLI-Conference, Göteborg, Schweden.
37. Rost, D.H. (1998). Leseverständnis. In D.H. Rost (Hrsg.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (S. 334-339). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
38. Schnotz,W. (1994). Aufbau vonWissensstrukturen. Untersuchungen zur Kohärenzbildung beim Wissenserwerb mit Texten. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
39. Schnotz,W. (2002). Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 101-120.
40. Schnotz,W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 49-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Schnotz,W. & Bannert,M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141-156.
42. Schwamborn, A., Leopold C., Thillmann, H., Sumfleth, E. & Leutner, D. (2008). The efficiency of learning with presented vs. selfconstructed pictorial representations. In A.Maes & S.Ainsworth (Eds.), Exploiting the opportunities. Learning with textual, graphical and multimodal representations (pp. 131-134). Tilburg: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
43. Seufert, T. (2003). Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 13, 227-237.
44. Seufert, T., Zander, S. & Brünken, R. (2007). Das Generieren von Bildern alsVerstehenshilfe beim Lernen aus Texten. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 39, 33-42.
45. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.
46. Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Tirre,W. C., Manelis, L. & Leicht, K. (1979). The effects of imaginal and verbal strategies on prose comprehension by adults. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 99-106.
48. van Dijk, T.A. and Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
49. vanMeter, P. (2001).Drawing construction as a strategy for learning form text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 129-140.
50. vanMeter, P.,Aleksic, M., Schwartz, A. and Garner, J. (2006). Learner- generated drawing as a strategy for learning fromcontent area text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 142-166.
51. van Meter, P. & Garner, J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 285-325.
52. Van Someren,M.W., Reimann, P., Boshuizen, H. P. A. and DeJong, T. (Eds.). (1998). Learning with multiple representations. Oxford: Elsevier.
53. Vekiri, I. (2002). What is the value of graphical displays in learning? Educational Psychology Review, 12, 261-312.
54. Verdi, M.P. & Kulhavy, R.W. (2002). Learning with maps and texts: An overview. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 27-46.
55. Vollmeyer, R. & Rheinberg, F. (1999). Motivation and metacognition when learning a complex system. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 541-554.
56. Weidenmann, B. (Hrsg.). (1994). Wissenserwerb mit Bildern. Bern: Huber.
57. Weidenmann, B. (2006). Lernen mit Medien. In A. Krapp & B. Weidenmann (Hrsg.), Pädagogische Psychologie (S. 423-476). Weinheim: Beltz.
58. Weinstein, C.E. & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
59. Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (Hrsg.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Theoretical perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.