How novices model business processes

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6336 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 29-44

  Recker, Jan ^a   Safrudin, Niz ^a   Rosemann, Michael ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

design quality; Design skills; experiment; process modeling

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; EXPERIMENTS;

BUSINESS PROCESS; DESIGN QUALITY; DESIGN SKILLS; GEO-SPATIAL INFORMATIONS; GRAPHICAL FORMS; GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS; PRACTICAL PROCESS; PROCESS MODELING;

PROCESS DESIGN;

EID: 78049255352     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15618-2_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Gallo, S.: How do Practitioners Use Conceptual Modeling in Practice? Data & Knowledge Engineering 58, 358-380 (2006) (Pubitemid 43994225)
2. Nickerson, J. V., Corter, J. E., Tversky, B., Zahner, D., Rho, Y. J.: The Spatial Nature of Thought. In: Boland, R. J., Limayem, M., Pentland, B. T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems, Paris, France (2008)
3. BPMI.org, OMG: Business Process Modeling Notation Specification. Final Adopted Specification. Object Management Group (2006), http://www.bpmn.org
4. Grosskopf, A., Edelman, J., Weske, M.: Tangible Business Process Modeling - Methodology and Experiment Design. In: Mutschler, B., Recker, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Empirical Research in Business Process Management. LNBIP, vol. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
5. Rosemann, M.: Potential Pitfalls of Process Modeling: Part A. Business Process Management Journal 12, 249-254 (2006) (Pubitemid 43502443)
6. Edelman, J., Grosskopf, A., Weske, M.: Tangible Business Process Modeling: A New Approach. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design. Stanford University, Stanford (2009)
7. Do, E. Y.-L., Gross, M. D., Neiman, B., Zimring, C.: Intentions in and Relations Among Design Drawings. Design Studies 21, 483-503 (2000)
8. Eisentraut, R., Günther, J.: Individual Styles of Problem Solving and their Relation to Representations in the Design Process. Design Studies 18, 369-383 (1997) (Pubitemid 127404075)
9. Prats, M., Lim, S., Jowers, I., Garner, S. W., Chase, S.: Transforming Shape in Design: Observations from Studies of Sketching. Design Studies 30, 503-520 (2009)
10. Simon, H. A.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
11. Mendling, J., Reijers, H. A., Recker, J.: Activity Labeling in Process Modeling: Empirical Insights and Recommendations. Information Systems 35, 467-482 (2010)
12. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Green, P.: Business Process Modeling: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10, 333-363 (2009)
13. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jørgensen, H. D.: Process Models Representing Knowledge for Action: a Revised Quality Framework. European Journal of Information Systems 15, 91-102 (2006) (Pubitemid 43323397)
14. Yang, Y., Tan, Q., Xiao, Y.: Verifying Web Services Composition Based on Hierarchical Colored Petri Nets. In: Hahn, A., Abels, S., Haak, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Interoperability of Heterogeneous Information Systems, pp. 47-54. ACM, Bremen (2005) (Pubitemid 44458307)
15. Curtis, B., Kellner, M. I., Over, J.: Process Modeling. Communications of the ACM 35, 75-90 (1992) (Pubitemid 23584400)
16. Boroditsky, L.: Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding Time through Spatial Metaphors. Cognition 75, 1-28 (2000) (Pubitemid 30433926)
17. Visser, W.: Design: One, but in Different Forms. Design Studies 30, 187-223 (2009)
18. Wang, W., Brooks, R. J.: Empirical Investigations of Conceptual Modeling and the Modeling Process. In: Henderson, S. G., Biller, B., Hsieh, M.-h. (eds.) Proceedings of the 39th Conference on Winter Simulation, pp. 762-770. IEEE, Washinton (2007)
19. Larkin, J. H., Simon, H. A.: Why a Diagram Is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science 11, 65-100 (1987)
20. Koning, H., Dormann, C., van Vliet, H.: Practical Guidelines for the Readability of IT-architecture Diagrams. In: Haramundanis, K., Priestley, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation, pp. 90-99. ACM, Ontario (2002)
21. Purcell, A. T., Gero, J. S.: Drawings and the Design Process: A Review of Protocol Studies in Design and Other Disciplines and Related Research in Cognitive Psychology. Design Studies 19, 389-430 (1998)
22. Kavakli, M., Gero, J. S.: Sketching as Mental Imagery 22(4) (2001)
23. Ferreira, J., Noble, J., Biddle, R.: A Case for Iconic Icons. In: Piekarski, W. (ed.) Proceedings of the 7th Australasian User Interface Conference, pp. 64-100. CRPIT, Hobart (2006)
24. Rogers, Y.: Pictorial Representations of Abstract Concepts Relating to Human-Computer Interaction. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 18, 43-44 (1986)
25. Mayer, R. E.: Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
26. Khatri, V., Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., Clay, P., Sung-Jin, P.: Understanding Conceptual Schemas: Exploring the Role of Application and IS Domain Knowledge. Information Systems Research 17, 81-99 (2006) (Pubitemid 43450180)
27. Moody, D. L.: The "Physics" of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 35, 756-779 (2009)
28. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S.: Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (2001)
29. Paivio, A.: Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford University Press, New York (1990)
30. Mayer, R. E., Moreno, R.: Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist 38, 43-51 (2003) (Pubitemid 36400003)
31. Kavlaki, E., Loucopoulos, P.: Experiences With Goal-Oriented Modeling of Organizational Change. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part C 36, 221-235 (2006)