Tangible Business Process Modeling: A new approach

DS 58-6: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design

Volumn 6, Issue PART 2, 2009, Pages 485-494

  Jonathan, Edelman ^a   Grosskopf, Alexander ^b   Weske, Mathias ^b   Leifer, Larry ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

BPMN; Business Process Modeling; Media Models; Structured Interviews; TBPM

Indexed keywords

BPMN; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; MEDIA-MODELS; STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; TBPM;

DESIGN; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; MODELS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 84859236449     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Davis, A., Dieste, O., Hickey, A., Juristo, N., and Moreno, A.: Effectiveness of requirements elicitation techniques: Empirical results derived from a systematic review. In: 14th IEEE International Conference Requirements Engineering. (2006) 179-188
2. Buxton, W., Service, S.O.: Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann (2007)
3. Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W., Dumas, M., Hofstede, A., and Russell, N.: On the suitability of BPMN for business process modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4102 (2006) 161
4. Representation in Scientific Practice, Lynch, M. and Woolgar, S. MIT Press (1990)
5. Sweller, J. and Chandler, P.: Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cognition and Instruction (1991)351-362
6. Miller, G.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two. Psychological review 63 (1956) 81-97
7. Byrd, T., Cossick, K., Zmud, R.: A synthesis of research on requirements analysis and knowledge acquisition techniques. Mis Quarterly (1992) 117-138
8. OMG: Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) 1.2. (January 2009)
9. Hines, P., Rich, N.: The seven value stream mapping tools. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 17 (1997) 46-64
10. Kettinger, W., Teng, J., Guha, S.: Business Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools. MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS QUARTERLY 21 (1997) 55-80
11. Tversky, B.: Some ways that maps and diagrams communicate. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1849 (2000) 72-79
12. Schneider, K.: Generating fast feedback in requirements elicitation. In: REFSQ. (2007) 160-174
13. Becker-Kornstaedt, U., Belau, W.: Descriptive Process Modeling in an Industrial Environment: Experience and Guidelines. Lecture notes in computer science (2000) 176-189
14. Brooks, A.: Results of rapid bottom-up software process modeling. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 9(4) (2004) 265-278
15. Valusek, J. and Fryback, D.: Information requirements determination: obstacles within, among and between participants. In: Proceedings of the twenty-first annual conference on Computer personnel research, ACM New York, NY, USA (1985) 103-111
16. Persson, A., Stirna, J.: An explorative study into the influence of business goals on the practical use of Enterprise Modeling methods and tools. New Perspectives on Information Systems Development: Theory, Methods and Practice, Kluwer Academic, New York, USA (2001)
17. Stirna, J., Persson, A., and Sandkuhl, K.: Participative Enterprise Modeling: Experiences and Recommendations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4495 (2007) 546