Experiences with goal-oriented modeling of organizational change

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 221-235

  Kavakli, Evangelia ^a   Loucopoulos, Pericles ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Change modeling; Organizational engineering; Requirements engineering

Indexed keywords

DATA STRUCTURES; INDUSTRY; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

CHANGE MODELING; ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE; ORGANIZATIONAL ENGINEERING;

FILE ORGANIZATION;

EID: 33645963452     PISSN: 10946977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TSMCC.2004.840066     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. T. W. Malone, R. Laubacher, and M. S. S. Morton, Inventing the Organizations of the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.
2. M. S. Morton, The Corporation of the 1990s: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 1991.
3. T. W. Malone, M. S. S. Morton, and R. R. Halperin, "Organizing for the 21st century," Strategy Leadership, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 6-10, 1996.
4. K. Maani, "Group model building for consensus building and team learning: A case study," in Proc. 18th Int. Conf. Systems Dynamics Society, Bergen, Norway, 2000, p. 133.
5. P. M. Milling and U. Koenig, "Change through effective communication: A system dynamics analysis," in Proc. 18th Int. Conf. System Dynamics Society, Bergen, Norway, 2000.
6. I. Nonaka, "A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation," Org. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14-37, 1994.
7. D. Stenmark, "Leveraging tacit organizational knowledge," J. Management Inform. Syst., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 9-24, 2001.
8. D. P. Andersen and G. P. Richardson, "Scripts for group model building," Syst. Dynamics Rev., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 107-129, 1997.
9. P. Loucopoulos and R. Zicari, Eds., Conceptual Modeling, Databases and CASE: An Integrated View of Information Systems Development: Wiley, 1992.
10. J. A. M. Vennix, "Group model-building: Tackling messy problems," Syst. Dynamics Rev., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 379-401, 1999.
11. S. Jarzabek and T. W. Ling, "Model-based support for business re-engineering," J. Inform. Softw. Technol., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 355-374, 1996.
12. J. Bubenko, "Enterprise modeling," Ingenierie des Systems d' Information, vol. 2, no. 6, 1994.
13. P. Loucopoulos, "The F3 (from fuzzy to formal) view on requirements engineering," Ing. Syst. d' Inform., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 639-655, 1995.
14. A. Dardenne, A. V. Lamsweerde, and S. Fickas, "Goal-directed requirements acquisition," Sci. Comput. Programming, vol. 20, pp. 3-50, 1993.
15. C. Rolland, C. Souveyet, and C. Ben Achour, "Guiding goal modeling using scenarios," IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1055-1071, Dec. 1998.
16. A. Anton, "Goal-based requirements analysis," in Proc. ICRE '96, Colorado Springs, CO, 1996, pp. 136-144.
17. E. Yu, "Toward modeling and reasoning support for early phase requirements engineering," in Proc. 3rd IEEE Int. Sym. Requirements Engineering7, Washington D.C., 1997, pp. 226-235.
18. L. Chung and B. A. Nixon, "Dealing with nonfunctional requirements: three experimental studies of a process-oriented approach," in Proc. Int. Conf. Software Engineering, Seattle, WA, 1995, pp. 25-37.
19. V. R. Basili, "Applying the goal/question/metric paradigm in the experience factory," in Software Quality Assurance and Measurement: A Worldwide Perspective, N. Fenton, R. Whitty, and Y. Lizuka, Eds. London, U.K.: Chapman and Hall, 1993, pp. 23-44.
20. A. I. Anton, W. M. McCracken, and C. Potts, "Goal decomposition and scenario analysis in business process reengineering," in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1994, pp. 94-104.
21. K. Pohl, "The three dimensions of requirements engineering," in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Paris, France, 1993.
22. W. R. Reitman, Cognition and Thought: An Information Processing Approach. New York: Wiley, 1965.
23. H. W. Rittel and M. M. Webber, "Planning problems are wicked problems," in Developments in Design Methodology, N. Cross, Ed: Wiley, 1984, pp. 135-144.
24. H. A. Simon, "The structure of ill-structured problems," in Developments in Design Methodology, N. Cross, Ed: Wiley, 1984, pp. 146-166.
25. U. Aguero and S. Dasgupta, "A plausibility-driven approach to computer architecture design," Commun. ACM, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 922-931, 1987.
26. A. Hooton, U. Aguero, and S. Dasgupta, "An exercise in plausibility-driven design," IEEE Computer, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 21-33, 1988.
27. J. M. Carrol, "Scenarios and design cognition," in Proc. IEEE Joint Int. Conf. Requirements Engineering (RE'02), Essen, Germany, 2002, pp. 3-5.
28. M. Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday, 1966.
29. E. Kavakli, "Goal-oriented requirements engineering: Modeling and guidance," in Computation. Manchester: UMIST, 1999, p. 250.
30. E. S. K. Yu, "Modeling organizations for information systems requirements engineering," in IEEE Int. Symp. Requirements Engineering, San Diego, CA, 1993, pp. 33-41.
31. E. Yu, L. Liu, and Y. Li, "Modeling strategic actor relationships to support intellectual property management," in Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Conceptual Modeling, ER-2001, Yokohama, Japan, 2001, pp. 164-178.
32. M. Lundeberg, "The ISAC approach to specification of information systems and its application to the organization of an IFIP working conference," in Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Comparative Review, T. W. Olle, H. G. Sol, and A. A. Verrijn-Stuart, Eds., The Netherlands: North-Holland, 1982, pp. 234-273.
33. A. van Lamsweerde and L. Willemet, "Inferring declarative requirements specifications from operational scenarios," IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1089-1114, Dec. 1998.
34. A. van Lamsweerde, "Goal-oriented requirements engineering: A guided tour," in Proc. 5th IEEE Int. Symp. Requirements Engineering, 2001, pp. 249-262.
35. A. Anton, A. Carter, J. Dempster, and D. Siege, "Deriving goals from a use-case based requirements specification for an electronic commerce system," in Requirements Engineering Journal. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001, vol. 6, pp. 63-73.
36. L. Chung, B. A. Nixon, E. Yu, and J. Mylopoulos, Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 2000.
37. C. Rolland, G. Grosz, and K. Regis, "Experience with goal-scenario coupling in requirements engineering," in IEEE Int. Symp. Requirements Engineering, Limerick, U.K., 1999, pp. 74-83.
38. P. Loucopoulos and E. Kavakli, "Enterprise modeling and the teleological approach to requirements engineering," Int. J. Intell. Cooperative Inform. Syst., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45-79, 1995.
39. P. Loucopoulos and E. Kavakli, "Enterprise knowledge management and conceptual modeling," in Conceptual Modeling: Current Issues and Future Directions, P. P. Chen et al., Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1999, pp. 123-143.
40. P. Loucopoulos, "From information modeling to enterprise modeling," in Information Systems Engineering: State of the Art and Research Themes, P. P. Chen, S. Brinkkemper, E. Lindencrona, and A. Solvberg, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2000, pp. 67-78.
41. S. Nurcan and C. Rolland, "A multimethod for defining the organizational change," Inform. Softw. Technol., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 61-82, 2003.
42. C. Rolland and S. E. A. Nurcan, "A decision-making pattern for guiding the enterprise knowledge development process," Inform. Softw. Technol., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 313-331, 2000.
43. M. Ould, Business Processes: Modeling and Analysis for Re-Engineering and Improvement. New York: Wiley, 1995.
44. E. Yu and J. Mylopoulos, "Why goal-oriented requirements engineering," in Proc. 4th Int. Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, Pisa, Italy, 1998, pp. 15-22.
45. P. Loucopoulos, V. Kavakli, N. Prekas, C. Rolland, and S. Nurcan, Using the EKD Approach: The Modeling Component. Manchester: UMIST, 1997.
46. R. Ackoff, Redesigning the Future. New York: Wiley, 1974.
47. E. Mumford and M. Weir, Computer Systems in Work Design - the ETHICS Method. London, U.K.: Associated, 1979.
48. B. Wilson, Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications. New York: Wiley, 1990.
49. P. Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. New York: Wiley, 1999.
50. I. Mitroff, Stakeholders of the Organizational Mind. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1983.
51. S. Clegg, Modern Organizations: Organization Studies in the Postmodern World. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
52. A. Wicks, D. Gilbert, and R. Freeman, "A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept," Business Ethics Quart., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 475-497, 1994.
53. L. Macaulay, Requirements Engineering. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1996.
54. R. Vidgen, "Stakeholders, soft systems and technology: Separation and mediation in the analysis of information systems requirements," Inform. Syst. J., vol. 7, pp. 21-46, 1997.
55. Ventana GroupSystems for Windows, Tuscon, AZ, 1994.
56. Electricity Supply Industry Structure, Ownership and Regulation in OECD Countries, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1994.
57. A. Adamantiades, J. Besant-Jones, and M. Hoskote, Power Sector Reform in Developing Countries and the Role of the World Bank. New York: World Bank, 1995.
58. M. Yajima, Deregulatory Reforms of the Electricity Supply Industry. Westport, CT: Quorum, 1997.
59. J. C. Jones, Design Methods, 2nd ed. London, U.K.: Chapman and Hall, 1992.
60. G. Smith and G. Browne, "Conceptual foundations of design problem solving," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1209-1219, Sep.-Oct. 1993.
61. R. S. Kenett and S. Zacks, Modern Industrial Statistics: Design and Control of Quality and Reliability. Belmont, CA: Duxbury, 1998.
62. S. Brinkkemper, "Method engineering: Engineering of information systems development methods and tools," J. Inform. Softw. Technol., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 275-280, 1996.
63. S. Brinkkemper, M. Saeki, and F. Harmsen, "Assembly techniques for method engineering," in Proc. CAiSE'98, Pisa, Italy, 1998, pp. 381-400.
64. C. Rolland, V. Plihon, and J. Ralyte, "Specifying the reuse context of scenario method chunks," in Proc. CAiSE'98, Pisa, Italy, 1998, pp. 191-218.
65. V. Kavakli and P. Loucopoulos, "Modeling of organizational change using the EKD framework," in Proc. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS), Jul. 1999, Article no. 6.
66. V. Kavakli, "Goal oriented requirements engineering: A unifying framework," Requirem. Eng. J., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 237-251, 2002.