Tangible business process modeling - Methodology and experiment design

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 43 LNBIP, Issue , 2010, Pages 489-500

  Grosskopf, Alexander ^a   Edelman, Jonathan ^b   Weske, Mathias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

BPMN; Media Models; Process Modeling; Structured Interviews; TBPM

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; CURRENT PRACTICES; DOMAIN EXPERTS; EMPIRICAL VALIDATION; EXPERIMENT DESIGN; IN-PROCESS; MEDIA-MODELS; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS MODELING; SHARE KNOWLEDGE; WORKING PROCEDURE;

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE;

EID: 77953974719     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12186-9_46     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Davis, A., Dieste, O., Hickey, A., Juristo, N., Moreno, A.: Effectiveness of requirements elicitation techniques: Empirical results derived from a systematic review. In: 14th IEEE International Conference Requirements Engineering, pp. 179-188 (2006)
2. Buxton, W., Service, S.O.: Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2007)
3. Martin, R.: Agile software development: principles, patterns, and practices. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2003)
4. Krallmann, H., Schönherr, M., Trier, M.: Systemanalyse im Unternehmen. Oldenbourg Verlag (2007)
5. Gabrielli, S.: Sap bpm methodology (September 2008), https://wiki.sdn. sap.com/wiki/display/SAPBPX/BPM (last checked 11/07/09)
6. Rauterberg, M.: Partizipative Modellbildung zur Optimierung der Softwareentwicklung. Informationssysteme und Künstliche Intelligenz 24, 26 (1992)
7. Persson, A.: Enterprise modelling in practice: situational factors and their influence on adopting a participative approach. PhD thesis, Dept. of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University (2001)
8. Byrd, T.A., Cossick, K.L., Zmud, R.W.: A synthesis of research on requirements analysis and knowledge acquisition techniques. Mis Quarterly, 117-138 (1992)
9. Sweller, J., Chandler, P.: Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cognition and Instruction, 351-362 (1991)
10. Miller, G.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two. Psychological review 63, 81-97 (1956)
11. Valusek, J., Fryback, D.: Information requirements determination: obstacles within, among and between participants. In: Proceedings of the twenty-first annual conference on Computer personnel research, pp. 103-111. ACM, New York (1985)
12. Vessey, I., Galletta, D.: Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition. Information Systems Research 2(1), 63 (1991)
13. Agarwal, R., Sinha, A., Tanniru, M.: Cognitive fit in requirements modeling: A study of object and process methodologies. Journal of Management Information Systems 13(2), 137-162 (1996)
14. Kettinger, W.J., Teng, J.T.C., Guha, S.: Business Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools. Management Information Systems Quarterly 21, 55-80 (1997)
15. Stirna, J., Persson, A., Sandkuhl, K.: Participative Enterprise Modeling: Experiences and Recommendations. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 546-560. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
16. Schneider, K.: Generating fast feedback in requirements elicitation. In: Sawyer, P., Paech, B., Heymans, P. (eds.) REFSQ 2007. LNCS, vol. 4542, pp. 160-174. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
17. Brooks, A.: Results of rapid bottom-up software process modeling. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 9(4), 265-278 (2004)
18. Tversky, B.: Some ways that maps and diagrams communicate. In: Habel, C., Brauer, W., Freksa, C., Wender, K.F. (eds.) Spatial Cognition 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1849, pp. 72-79. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
19. Bandara, W., Tan, H.M., Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M.: Bibliography of process modeling: An emerging research field. Technical report, QUT (January 2009)
20. Creswell, J.W.: Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Pubns., Thousand Oaks (2008)
21. Sjøberg, D., Hannay, J., Hansen, O., Kampenes, V., Karahasanovic, A., Liborg, N., Rekdal, A.: A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31(9), 733-753 (2005)
22. Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., Leifer, L.: Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. IEEE Engineering Management Review 34(1), 65-92 (2006)
23. Beckman, S., Barry, M.: Innovation as a learning process: Embedded design thinking. Harvard Business Publishing, Boston (2007)
24. March, S., Smith, G.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4), 251-266 (1995)
25. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly 28(1), 75-106 (2004)