Beyond hard outcomes: 'Soft' outcomes and engagement as student success

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 661-673

  Zepke, Nick ^a   Leach, Linda ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Skills development; Soft outcomes; Student engagement; Student outcomes

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958528099     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2010.522084     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ahlfeldt, S., S. Mehta, and T. Sellnow. 2005. Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use. Higher Education Research and Development 24, no. 1: 5-20.
2. Australian Council for Educational Research. 2008. Attracting, engaging and retaining: New conversations about learning. Australasian student engagement report. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.
3. Barnett, R., and K. Coate. 2005. Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
4. Bennett, N., E. Dunne, and C. Carré. 1999. Patterns of core and generic skill provision in higher education. Higher Education 37: 71-93.
5. Berger, J.B. 2000. Optimizing capital, social reproduction, and undergraduate persistence: A sociological perspective. In Reworking the student departure puzzle, ed. J.M. Braxton, 95-124. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
6. Bourdieu, P. 1973. Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In Knowledge, education and cultural change, ed. R. Brown, 487-510. London: Tavistock.
7. Bruning, S. 2002. Relationship building as a retention strategy: Linking relationship attitudes and satisfaction evaluations to behavioral outcomes. Public Relations Review 28, no. 1: 39-48.
8. Bryson, C., and L. Hand. 2007. The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 44, no. 4: 349-62.
9. Butcher, B., H. Foster, L. Marsden, J McKibben, and C. Anderson. 2006. Soft outcomes universal learning: A practical framework for measuring the progress of informal learning. Summary report RS8716. The Research Centre, City College Norwich, Norwich. http://www.theresearchcentre.co.uk/soul/Documents/SOUL%20Project%20Summary%20Report. pdf (accessed July 11, 2005).
10. Butcher, B., and L. Marsden. 2004. Measuring soft outcomes: A review of the literature. The Research and Development Bulletin 2, no. 3: 31-6.
11. Butcher, B., and L. Marsden. 2005. Soft outcomes universal learning. The Research and Development Bulletin 3, no. 1: 45-52.
12. Chapman, E. 2003. Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 8, no. 13. http://www.PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=13 (accessed May 20, 2004).
13. Dewson, S., J. Eccles, N. Tackey, and A. Jackson. 2000. Guide to measuring soft outcomes and distance travelled. Brighton: The Institute of Employment Studies. http://www.web.ukonline. co.uk/alichters/SoftIndicators.pdf (accessed July 15, 2005).
14. Green, A. 1998. Core skills, key skills and general culture: In search of the common foundation in vocational education. Evaluation and Research in Education 12, no. 1: 23-43.
15. Hinton, L., and R. Tickner. 2000. Causes of attrition in first year students in arts, health and science and recommendations for intervention. Proceedings of the first year experience conference, July 4 7, in Brisbane, Australia.
16. Hu, S., and G. Kuh. 2002. Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education 43, no. 5: 555-75.
17. Hyland, T. 2003. Work-based learning programmes and social capital. Journal of In-service Education 29, no. 1: 49-60.
18. Isaacs, P. 2005. Literacy, adult education and value for money. New Zealand Journal of Adult Learning 33, no. 1: 66-78.
19. Johnson, D., M. Soldner, J. Leonard, P. Alvarez, K. Inkelas, H. Rowan-Kenyon, and S. Longerbeam. 2007. Examining sense of belonging among first-year undergraduates from different racial/ethnic groups. Journal of College Student Development 48, no. 5: 525-42.
20. Kelly, A. 2001. The evolution of key skills: Towards a Tawney paradigm. Journal of Vocational Education and Training 53, no. 1: 21-36.
21. Krause, K.-L., R. Hartley, R. James, and C. McInnis. 2005. The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training, Australian Government.
22. Kuh, G., J. Kinzie, J. Buckley, B. Bridges, and J. Hayek. 2006. What matters to student success: A review of the literature. Commissioned Report. http://www.nces.ed.gov/IPEDS/research/ pdf/Kuh_Team_Report.pdf (accessed December 12, 2007).
23. Kuh, G., J. Kinzie, K. Schuh, E. Whitt, and Associates. 2005. Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24. McClenney, K. 2004. Redefining quality in community colleges: Focusing on good educational practice. Change November/December: 16-21.
25. McInnis, C. 2003. New realities of the student experience: How should universities respond? Paper presented at the European Association for Institutional Research 25th annual conference, August 24-27, in Limerick, Ireland.
26. McInnis, C., and R. James. 1994. Gap or gulf? Student perspectives on the transition to university in Australia. Paper presented at the inaugural Pacific rim first year experience conference, July 15, Queensland University of Techology, Brisbane.
27. McInnis, C., R. James, and C. McNaught. 1995. First year on campus: Diversity in the initial experiences of Australian undergraduates. Melbourne, VIC: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.
28. McMahon, B., and J. Portelli. 2004. Engagement for what? Beyond popular discourses of student engagement. Leadership and Policy in Schools 3, no. 1: 59-76.
29. Ministry of Education. 2002. Tertiary education strategy 2002/07. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
30. Ministry of Education. 2006. Tertiary education strategy 2007-12 and statement of tertiary education priorities. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
31. Ministry of Education. 2009. Tertiary education strategy 2010-15. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
32. Moran, E., and T. Gonyea. 2003. The influence of academically-focused peer interaction on college students' development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED478773). Washington, DC: ERIC.
33. Ryan, R., and E. Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55, no. 1: 68-78.
34. Steer, R., and G. Humm. 2001. Developing 'soft' outcome indicators and measures of 'distance travelled': Issues from the evaluation of the neighbourhood support fund. http://www.gettingon.co.uk/toolkit/comdev foundation.html (accessed May 3, 2005).
35. Tinto, V. 2002. Taking student retention seriously: Rethinking the first year of college. A speech presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admission Officers, April 15, in Minneapolis, MN. http://www.soeweb.syr.edu/academics/grad/higher_education/Copy%20of%20Vtinto/Files/AACRAOSpeech.pdf (accessed October 8, 2003).
36. Yorke, M. 2006. Student engagement: Deep, surface or strategic? Keynote address delivered at the Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference, Griffith University, July 12-14, Gold Coast Campus, Australia.
37. Zepke, N., L. Leach, and P. Isaacs. 2008. Foundation learning in the ITP sector: Experiences of foundation learners. Wellington: ITPNZ.
38. Zepke, N., L. Leach, and T. Prebble. 2005. Now you have got them, can you expect to keep them? Factors that influence student departure and persistence. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 40, no. 1: 181-99.