Teaching reading in the 21st century: A glimpse at how special education teachers promote reading comprehension

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 59-74

  Klingner, Janette K ^d   Urbach, Jennifer ^a   Golos, Deborah ^b   Brownell, Mary ^c   Menon, Shailaja ^d  

^a University of Northern   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958480154     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073194871003300201     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allington, R. L., & McGlll-Franzen, M. (1989). School response to reading failure: Chapter 1 and special education students In grades 2, 4, & 8. Elementary School Journal, 89(5), 529-542.
2. Atwell, N. (1998). In the middle: New understanding about writing, reading, and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3. Beck, I., Farr, R., Flor-Ada, A., Brechtel, M., McKeown, M., Roser, N., et al. (2003). Harcourt Trophies: Reading 1-6. Orlando, FL: Harcourt School Publishers.
4. Brownell, M. T., Bishop, A. G., Gersten, R., Klingner, J. K., Dimlno, J., Haager, D., Menon, S., Penfield, R., & Sindelar, P. T. (2009). Examining the dimensions of teacher quality for beginning special education teachers: The role of domain expertise. Exceptional Children, 75, 391-411.
5. Brownell, M. T., Haager, D., Bishop, A., Klingner, J. K., Penfield, R., & Dingle, M. (in preparation). Teacher quality in special education: The role of domain expertise.
6. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Helnemann.
7. Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1993). Strategy mastery by atrisk students: Not a simple matter. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 153-167.
8. Duffy, G. G. (2002). The case for direct explanation of strategies. In M. Pressley & K. C. Block (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 28-41). New York: Guilford.
9. Durkin, D. (1978-1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14(4), 481-533.
10. Engelmann, S., Arbogast, A., Bruner, E., Lou Davis, K., Engelmann, O., Hanner, S., et al. (2002). SRA Reading Mastery Plus. DeSoto, TX: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
11. Englert, C. S. (1984). Effective direct Instruction practices in special education settings. Remedial & Special Education, 5, 38-47.
12. Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Helnemann.
13. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256.
14. Gajria, M., Jitendra, A. K., Sood, S., & Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 210-225.
15. Gamse, B. C., Bloom, H. S., Kemple, J. J., & Jacob, R. T. (2008). Reading First impact study: Interim report (NCEE 2008-4016). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
16. Gelzheiser, L. M., & Myers, J. (1991). Reading instruction by classroom, remedial and resource room teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 512-526.
17. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L., Williams, J., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279-320.
18. Haager, D., Gersten, R., Baker, S., & Graves, A. (2003). The English-Language Learner Classroom Observation Instrument: Observations of beginning reading instruction In urban schools. In S. R. Vaughn & K. L. Briggs (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for observing teaching and learning (pp. 111144). Baltimore: Brookes.
19. Haynes, M., & Jenkins, J. (1986). Reading instruction in special education resource rooms. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 161-190.
20. Hilden, K. R., & Pressley, M. (2006). Self-regulation through transactional strategies instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 51-75.
21. Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719-729.
22. Jenkins, J. R., Hellotis, J., Stein, M. L., & Haynes, M. (1987). Improving reading comprehension by using paragraph restatements. Exceptional Children, 54, 54-59.
23. Jiménez, R. T. (1997). The strategic reading abilities and potential of five low-literacy Latlna/o readers in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(3), 224-243.
24. Klingner, J. K., Ahwee, S., Pilonieta, P., & Menendez, R. (2003). Barriers and facilitators in scaling up research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 69, 411-429.
25. Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Arguelles, M. E., Hughes, M. T., & Ahwee, S. (2004). Collaborative strategic reading: "Real world" lessons from classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 291-302.
26. LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (1999). Analyzing and Interpreting ethnographic data. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
27. Lelnhardt, G., Zigmond, N., & Cooley, W. W. (1981). Reading instruction and its effects. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 343-361.
28. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Bakken, J. P., & Whedon, C. (1996). Reading comprehension: A synthesis of research in learning disabilities, In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (pp. 277-303). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
29. McGill-Franzen, A., & Allington, R. L. (1990). Comprehension and coherence: Neglected elements of literacy instruction In remedial and resource room services. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 6(2), 149-182.
30. Meltzer, L. J. (Ed.). (2007). Executive function in education. New York: Guilford Press.
31. Mercer, C. D., Jordan, L., Miller, M. D., Schenck, B. J., Black, K., Bock, M., et al. (1997). Curriculum-based assessment in Alachua County. Gainesville, FL: Exceptional Student Education School Board of Alachua County.
32. Moody, S. W., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Fischer, M. (2000). Reading instruction in the resource room: Set up for failure. Exceptional Children, 66, 305-316.
33. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading Instruction [On-line]. Available: http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/small book.pdf
34. O'Sullivan, P. J., Ysseldyke, J. E., Chrlstenson, S. L., & Thurlow, M. L. (1990). Mildly handicapped elementary students' opportunity to learn during reading instruction in mainstream and special education settings. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 131-146.
35. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). The reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
36. Pressley, M., & El Dinary, P. B. (1997). What we know about translating comprehension-strategies instruction research into practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 486-488.
37. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta-Hampston, J., & Echevarria, M. (1998). Literacy Instruction in 10 fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms In upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(2), 159-194.
38. Public Law 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425, enacted January 8, 2002.
39. Roller, C. (1996). Variability not disability: Struggling readers in a workshop classroom. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
40. Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
41. Stanovich, P., & Jordan, A. (1998). Canadian teachers' and principals' beliefs about Inclusive education as predictors of effective teaching in heterogeneous classrooms. Elementary School Journal. 98, 221-238.
42. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newberry Park, CA: Sage.
43. Swanson, H. L. (1999). Reading comprehension and working memory in learning-disabled readers: Is the phonological loop more Important than the executive system? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 72, 1-31.
44. Swanson, H. L. (2001). Reading intervention research outcomes and students with LD: What are the major instructional ingredients for successful outcomes? Perspectives, 27(2), 18-20.
45. Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcome. New York: Guilford.
46. Torgesen, J. K. (1994). Issues in the assessment of executive function: An information-processing perspective. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 143-162). Baltimore: Brookes.
47. Torgesen, J. K., & Licht, B. (1983). The learning disabled child as an inactive learner: Restrospect and prospects. In J. D.
48. McKinney & L. Feagans (Eds.), Current topics in learning disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 3-32). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
49. Vaughn, S., Levy, S., Coleman, M., & Bos, C. S. (2002). Reading instruction for students with LD and EBD: A synthesis of observation studies. Journal of Special Education, 36, 2-13.
50. Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., Sc Chard, D. J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99-114.
51. Vaughn, S., Moody, S., Sc Schumm, J. S. (1998). Broken promises: Reading instruction in the resource room. Exceptional Children, 64(2), 211-226.
52. Wong, B.Y.L., Sc Jones, W. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questing training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228-240.
53. Ysseldyke, J. E., Thurlow, M. L., Mecklenburg, C., & Graden, J. (1984). Opportunity to learn for regular and special education students during reading instruction. Remedial and Special