The effects of temporal delay and orientation on haptic object recognition

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1975-1980

  Craddock, Matt ^a   Lawson, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); STEREOGNOSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77958459797     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1975     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amedi, A., Jacobson, G., Hendler, T., Malach, R., & Zohary, E. (2002). Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1202-1212. doi:10.1093/cercor/12.11.1202
2. Amedi, A., Malach, R., Hendler, T., Peled, S., & Zohary, E. (2001). Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 324-330. doi:10.1038/85201
3. Craddock, M., & Lawson, R. (2008). Repetition priming and the haptic recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1350-1365. doi:10.3758/PP.70.7.1350
4. Craddock, M., & Lawson, R. (2009a). The effects of size changes on haptic object recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 910-923. doi:10.3758/APP.71.4.910
5. Craddock, M., & Lawson, R. (2009b). Size-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition. PLoS ONE, 4, e8009. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008009
6. Ellis, R., & Allport, D. A. (1986). Multiple levels of representation for visual objects: A behavioural study. In A. G. Cohn & J. R. Thomas (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and its applications (pp. 245-257). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
7. Ellis, R., Allport, D. A., Humphreys, G. W., & Collis, J. (1989). Varieties of object constancy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 775-796.
8. Gallace, A., Tan, H. Z., Haggard, P., & Spence, C. (2008). Short term memory for tactile stimuli. Brain Research, 1190, 132-142. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.014
9. Gilson, E. Q., & Baddeley, A. D. (1969). Tactile short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 180-184. doi:10.1080/14640746908400211
10. Humphrey, G. K., & Lupker, S. J. (1993). Codes and operations in picture matching. Psychological Research, 55, 237-247.
11. Jarmasz, J., & Hollands, J. G. (2009). Confidence intervals in repeatedmeasures designs: The number of observations principle. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 124-138. doi:10.1037/ a0014164
12. Kiphart, M. J., Hughes, J. L., Simmons, J. P., & Cross, H. A. (1992). Short-term haptic memory for complex objects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 212-214.
13. Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., & Metzger, V. A. (1985). Identifying objects by touch: An "expert system." Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 299-302.
14. Lacey, S., Peters, A., & Sathian, K. (2007). Cross-modal object recognition is viewpoint-independent. PLoS ONE, 2, e890. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0000890
15. Lawson, R. (1999). Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychologica, 102, 221-245. doi:10.1016/ S0001-6918(98)00052-3
16. Lawson, R. (2009). A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 911-930. doi:10.1037/a0015025
17. Lawson, R., & Humphreys, G. (1996). View specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 395-416. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.395
18. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
19. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Miles, C., & Borthwick, H. (1996). Tactile short-term memory revisited. Memory, 4, 655-668.
21. Millar, S. (1974). Tactile short-term memory by blind and sighted children. British Journal of Psychology, 65, 253-263.
22. Miquée, A., Xerri, C., Rainville, C., Anton, J.-L., Nazarian, B., Roth, M., & Zennou-Azogui, Y. (2008). Neuronal substrates of haptic shape encoding and matching: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience, 152, 29-39. doi:10.1016/ j.neuroscience.2007.12.021
23. Newell, F. N., Ernst, M. O., Tjan, B. S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2001). Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 37-42. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00307
24. Norman, J. F., Clayton, A. M., Norman, H. F., & Crabtree, C. E. (2008). Learning to perceive differences in solid shape through vision and touch. Perception, 37, 185-196. doi:10.1068/p5679
25. Schooler, L. J., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2005). Efficiently measuring recognition performance with sparse data. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 3-10.
26. Sullivan, E. V., & Turvey, M. T. (1972). Short-term retention of tactile stimulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 253261. doi:10.1080/14640747208400278
27. Tarr, M. J., & Cheng, Y. D. (2003). Learning to see faces and objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 23-30. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02) 00010-4.
28. Woods, A. T., O'Modhrain, S., & Newell, F. N. (2004). The effect of temporal delay and spatial differences on cross-modal object recognition. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 260-269. doi:10.3758/CABN.4.2.260