View Specificity in Object Processing: Evidence from Picture Matching

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 395-416

  Lawson, Rebecca ^a,b   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0030114665     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.2.395     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bartram, D. J. (1976). Levels of coding in picture-picture comparison tasks. Memory & Cognition, 4, 593-602.
2. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991a). Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception, 20, 585-593.
3. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991b). Object recognition and laterally: Null effects. Neuropsychologia, 29, 685-694.
4. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991c). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence from intermediate representations in visual object priming. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
5. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 640-645.
6. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence for 3-D viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
7. Boucart M., & Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Global shape cannot be attended without object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 785-806.
8. Cooper, E. E., Biederman, I., & Hummel, J. (1992). Metric invariance in object recognition: A review and further evidence. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 191-214.
9. Edelman, S., & Weinshall, D. (1991). A self-organizing multiple-view representation of 3D objects. Biological Cybernetics, 64, 209-219.
10. Ellis, R., & Allport, D. A. (1986). Multiple levels of representation for visual objects: A behavioral study. In A. G. Cohn & J. R. Thomas (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and its applications (pp. 245-247). Chichester, England: Wiley.
11. Ellis, R., Allport, D. A., Humphreys, G. W., & Collis, J. (1989). Varieties of object constancy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 775-796.
12. Hinton, G. E. (1981). A parallel computation that assigns canonical object-based frames of reference. Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2, 683-685.
13. Humphrey, G. K., & Jolicoeur, P. (1993). Visual object identification: Some effects of image foreshortening, monocular depth cues, and visual field on object identification. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 137-159.
14. Humphrey, G. K., & Lupker, S. J. (1993). Codes and operations in picture matching. Psychological Research, 55, 237-247.
15. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1984). Route to object constancy: Implications from neurological impairments of object constancy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 385-415.
16. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
17. Kelter, S., Grötzbach, H., Freiheit, R., Höhle, B., Wutzig, S., & Diesch, E. (1984). Object identification: The mental representation of physical and conceptual attributes. Memory & Cognition, 12, 123-133.
18. Klatzky, R. L., & Stoy, A. M. (1974). Using visual codes for comparisons of pictures. Memory & Cognition, 2, 727-736.
19. Lawson, R. (1994). The effects of viewpoint on object recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Birmingham University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
20. Lawson, R., Humphreys, G. W., & Watson, D. G. (1994). Object recognition under sequential viewing conditions: Evidence for viewpoint-specific recognition procedures. Perception, 23, 595-614.
21. Lowe, D. (1987). Three-dimensional object recognition from single two-dimensional images. Artificial Intelligence, 31, 355-395.
22. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
23. Palmer, S., Rosch, E., & Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 135-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Perrett, D. I., Benson, P. J., Oram, M. W., & Hietanen, J. K. (1994). Issues of representation in object vision. In M. Farah & G. Ratcliff (Eds.), The neuropsychology of high-level vision: Collected tutorial essays (pp. 33-62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Posner, M. I. (1969). Abstraction and the process of recognition. In J. T. Spence & G. Bower (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 43-100). New York: Academic Press.
26. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1967). Decay of visual information from a single letter. Science, 158, 137-139.
27. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
28. Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon-structural descriptions or by multiple-views? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
29. Tarr, M. J., Hayward, W. G., Gauthier, I., & Williams, P. (1994, November). Geon recognition is viewpoint dependent. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
30. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-283.
31. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behaviour (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Warrington, E. K., & Taylor, A. M. (1973). The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition. Cortex, 9, 152-164.
33. Warrington, E. K., & Taylor, A. M. (1978). Two categorical stages of object recognition. Perception, 7, 695-705.