Hierarchical relational binding in the medial temporal lobe: The strong get stronger

Hippocampus

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1206-1216

  Shimamura, Arthur P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Declarative memory; Episodic memory; Hippocampus; Recollection; Relational binding

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DECLARATIVE MEMORY; EPISODIC MEMORY; HIERARCHICAL RELATIONAL BINDING THEORY; HIPPOCAMPUS; LONG TERM MEMORY; MEDIAL TEMPORAL LOBE; NEOCORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECOGNITION; TEMPORAL LOBE; THEORY;

ANIMALS; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROC CURVE; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 77958162023     PISSN: 10509631     EISSN: 10981063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20856     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aggleton JP, Brown MW. 1999. Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippo-campal-anterior thalamic axis. Behav Brain Sci 22: 425-444.
2. Banks WP. 2000. Recognition and source memory as multivariate decision processes. Psychol Sci 11: 267-273.
3. Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. 2007. Memory, perception, and the ventral visual-perirhinal-hippocampal stream: Thinking outside of the boxes. Hippocampus 17: 898-908.
4. Bussey TJ, Saksida LM, Murray EA. 2005. The perceptual-mnemonic/feature conjunction model of perirhinal cortex function. Quart J Exp Psychol B 58: 269-282.
5. Cabeza R, St. Jacques P. 2007. Functional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory. Trends Cogn Sci 11: 219-227.
6. Cabeza R, Ciaramelli E, Olson IR, Moscovitch M. 2008. The parietal cortex and episodic memory: An attentional account. Nat Rev Neurosci 9: 613-625.
7. Cermak LS, O'Connor M. 1983. The anterograde and retrograde retrieval ability of a patient with amnesia due to encephalitis. Neuropsychologia 21: 213-234.
8. Cohen NJ, Eichenbaum H. 1993. Memory, Amnesia, and the Hippocampal System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. D'Esposito M. 2007. From cognitive to neural models of working memory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362: 761-772.
10. Davachi L. 2006. Item, context, and relational episodic encoding in humans. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16: 693-700.
11. Davachi L, Mitchell JP, Wagner AD. 2003. Multiple routes to memory: Distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100: 2157-2162.
12. DeCarlo LT. 2003. An application of signal detection theory with finite mixture dis-tributions to source discrimination. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn 29: 767-778.
13. Diana RA, Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C. 2007. Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: A threecomponent model. Trends Cogn Sci 11: 379-386.
14. Dodson CS, Holland PW, Shimamura AP. 1998. On the recollection of ex-act and partial source information. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn 24: 1121-1136.
15. Eichenbaum H, Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C. 2007. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu Rev Neurosci 30: 123-152.
16. Elfman KW, Parks CM, Yonelinas AP. 2008. Testing a neurocomputational model of recollection, familiarity, and source recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34: 752-768.
17. Glanzer M, Hilford A, Kim K. 2004. Six regularities of source recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30: 1176-1195.
18. Green DM, Swets JA. 1966. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
19. Hilford A, Glanzer M, Kim K, DeCarlo LT. 2002. Regularities of source rec-ognition: ROC analysis. J Exp Psychol: Gen 131: 494-510.
20. Holdstock JS, Mayes AR, Gong QY, Roberts N, Kapur N. 2005. Item recognition is less impaired than recall and associative recognition in a patient with selective hippocampal damage. Hippocampus 15: 203-221.
21. Hutchinson JB, Uncapher MR, Wagner AD. 2009. Posterior parietal cortex and episodic retrieval: Convergent and divergent effects of attention and memory. Learn Mem 16: 343-356.
22. Kirwan CB, Wixted JT, Squire LR. 2010. A demonstration that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 344-348.
23. Klostermann EC, Shimamura AP. 2008. Functional connectivity of frontal-parietal circuits during successful retrieval of auditory stimuli is related to memory performance. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Washington, D.C.
24. Klostermann EC, Loui P, Shimamura AP. 2009. Activation of right parietal cortex during memory retrieval of nonlinguistic auditory stimuli. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 9: 242-248.
25. Lavenex P, Amaral DG. 2000. Hippocampal-neocortical interaction: A hierarchy of associativity. Hippocampus 10: 420-430.
26. Lynch G, Rex CS, Gall CM. 2007. LTP consolidation: Substrates, explanatory power and functional significance. Neuropharmacology 52: 12-23.
27. MacKinnon D, Squire LR. 1989. Autobiographical memory in amnesia. Psychobiology 17: 247-256.
28. Marslen-Wilson WD, Teuber HL. 1975. Memory for remote events in anterrograde amnesia: Recognition of public figures from news photographs. Neuropsychologia 13: 353-364.
29. McClelland JL, McNaughton BL, O'Reilly RC. 1995. Why there are com-plementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychol Rev 102: 419-437.
30. Miller EK, Cohen JD. 2001. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24: 167-202.
31. Mishkin M, Suzuki WA, Gadian DG, Vargha-Khadem F. 1997. Hierarchical organization of cognitive memory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 352: 1461-1467.
32. Morris RGM. 2006. Elements of a neurobiological theory of hippocampal function: The role of synaptic plasticity, synaptic tagging, and schemas. Eur J Neurosci 23: 2829-2846.
33. Murray EA, Bussey TJ, Saskida LM. 2007. Visual perception and memory: A new view of medial temporal lobe function in primates and rodents. Annu Rev Neurosci 30: 99-122.
34. Nadel L, Moscovitch M. 1997. Memory consolidation, retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 7: 431-439.
35. Norman KA, O'Reilly RC. 2003. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach. Psychol Rev 110: 611-646.
36. O'Reilly RC, McClelland JL. 1994. Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: Avoiding a tradeoff. Hippocampus 4: 661-682.
37. O'Reilly RC, Norman KA. 2002. Hippocampal and neocortical contributions to memory: Advances in the complementary learning systems framework. Trends Cogn Sci 6: 505-510.
38. Paller KA, Wagner AD. 2002. Observing the transformation of experience into memory. Trends Cogn Sci 6: 92-102.
39. Parks CM, Yonelinas AP. 2007. Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: Comment on Wixted (2007). Psychol Rev 114: 188-202.
40. Petralia RSl, Yokotani N, Wenthold RJ. 1994. Light and electron microscope distribution of the NMDA receptor subunit MNDAR1 in the rat nervous system using a selective anti-peptide antibody. J Neurosci 14: 667-696.
41. Qin J, Raye CL, Johnson MK, Mitchell KJ. 2001. Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: Comment on Yonelinas (1999). J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27: 1110-1115.
42. Ratcliff R, Sheu C-F, Gronlund S. 1992. Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychol Rev 99: 518-535.
43. Shannon BJ, Buckner RL. 2004. Functional-anatomic correlates of memory retrieval that suggest nontraditional processing roles for multiple distinct regions within the posterior parietal cortex. J Neurosci 24: 10084-10092.
44. Shimamura AP. 2000. The role of the prefrontal cortex in dynamic filtering. Psychobiology 28: 207-218.
45. Shimamura AP. 2002. Relational binding theory and the role of consolidation in memory retrieval. In: Squire LR, Schacter DL, editors. The Neuropsychology of Memory, 3rd ed. New York: Guilford. pp 61-72.
46. Shimamura AP. 2008. A neurocognitive approach to metacognitive monitoring and control. In Dunlosky J, Bjork R, editors. Handbook of Memory and Metacognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. pp 373-390.
47. Shimamura AP, Squire LR. 1987. A neuropsychological study of fact memory and source amnesia. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 13: 464-473.
48. Shimamura AP, Wickens TD. 2009. Superadditive memory strength for item and source recognition: The role of hierarchical relational binding in the medial temporal lobe. Psychol Rev 116: 1-19.
49. Slotnick SD, Dodson CS. 2005. Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory. Mem Cogn 33: 151-170.
50. Slotnick SD, Klein SA, Dodson CS, Shimamura AP. 2000. An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 26: 1499-1517.
51. Squire LR, Zola-Morgan SM. 1998. Episodic memory, semantic memory, and amnexsia. Hippocampus 8: 205-211.
52. Squire LR, Cohen NJ, Nadel L. 1984. The medial temporal region and memory consolidation: A new hypothesis. In: Weingartner H, Parker ES, editors. Memory Consolidation: Psycholobiology of Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp 185-210.
53. Squire LR, Shimamura AP, Amaral D. 1989. Memory and the hippocampus. In: Byrne JH, Berry WO, editors. Neural Models of Plasticity. Academic Press: New York. pp 208-239.
54. Squire LR, Clark RE, Bayley PJ. 2004. Medial temporal lobe function and memory. In: Gazzaniga M, editor. The Cognitive Neurosciences III. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp 691-708.
55. Squire LR, Wixted JT, Clark RE. 2007. Recognition memory and the medal temporal lobe: A new perspective. Nat Rev 8: 872-883.
56. Staresina BP, Davachi L. 2008. Selective and shared contributions of the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex to episodic item and associative encoding. J Cogn Neurosci 20: 1478-1489.
57. Stark CS, Bayley PJ, Squire LR. 2007. Recognition memory for single items and for associations is similarly impaired following damage to the hippocampal region. Learn Mem 9: 238-242.
58. Suzuki WA. 2007. Making new memories: The role of the hippocampus in new associative learning. Ann NY Acad Sci 1097: 1-11.
59. Suzuki WA. 2009. Perception and the medial temporal lobe: Evaluating the current evidence. Neuron 61: 657-666.
60. Suzuki WA, Amaral DG. 1994. Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey: Cortical afferents. J Comp Neurol 350: 497-533.
61. Tse D, Langston RF, Kakeyama M, Bethus I, Spooner PA, Wood ER, Witter MP, Morris RGM. 2007. Schemas and memory consolidation. Science 316: 76-82.
62. Van Hoesen GW, Pandya DN. 1975. Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. III. Efferent connections. Brain Res 95: 48-67.
63. Vargha-Khadem F, Gadian DG, Watkins KE, Connelly A, Van Paesschen W, Mishkin M. 1997. Differential effects of early hippocampal pathology on episodic and semantic memory. Science 27: 376-380.
64. Vilberg KL, Rugg MD. 2008. Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: A review of evidence from a dual-process perspective. Neuropsychologia 46: 1787-1799.
65. Wais P. 2008. fMRI signals associated with memory strength in the medial temporal lobes: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 46: 3185-3196.
66. Wais PE, Wixted JT, Hopkins RO, Squire LR. 2006. The hippocampus supports both the recollection and the familiarity components of recognition memory. Neuron 49: 459-466.
67. Wickens TD. 2002. Elementary Signal Detection Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
68. Wixted JT. 2007. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychol Rev 114: 152-176.
69. Yonelinas AP. 1994. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 20: 1341-1354.
70. Yonelinas AP. 1999. The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and analysis of receiver operating characteristics. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25: 1415-1434.
71. Yonelinas AP, Parks CM. 2007. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: A review. Psychol Bull 133: 800-832.