Recognition memory for realistic synthetic faces

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1233-1244

  Yotsumoto, Yuko ^a,d   Kahana, Michael J ^b   Wilson, Hugh R ^c   Sekuler, Robert ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FACIES; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION; SHORT TERM MEMORY; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 33947194592     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193597     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. ASHBY, F. G., & ELL, S. W. (2001). The neurobiology of human category learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 204-210.
2. ASHBY, F. G., & MADDOX, W. T. (1998). Stimulus categorization. In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, decision, and measurement: Essays in honor of R. Duncan Luce (pp. 251-301). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446.
4. BRUNSWIK, E., & REITER, L. (1937). Eindruckscharaktere schematisierter Gesichter. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 142, 67-134.
5. CLARK, S. E., & GRONLUND, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
6. DIAMANTARAS, K. I., & KUNG, S. Y. (1996). Principal component neural networks. New York: Wiley.
7. DRYDEN, I. L., & MARDIA, V. (1998). Statistical shape analysis. New York: Wiley.
8. DUCHAINE, B. C., & WEIDENFELD, A. (2003). An evaluation of two commonly used tests of unfamiliar face recognition. Neuropsychologia, 41, 713-720.
9. EKMAN, P., & FRIESEN, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial cues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. ENNIS, D. M. (1988). Confusable and discriminable stimuli: Comment on Nosofsky (1986) and Shepard (1986). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 408-411.
11. ENNIS, D. M., MULLEN, K., FRIJTERS, J. E. R., & TINDALL, J. (1989). Decision conflicts: Within-trial resampling in Richardson's method of triads. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 42, 265-269.
12. GALLEGOS, D. R., & TRANEL, D. (2005). Positive facial affect facilitates identification of famous faces. Brain & Language, 93, 338-348.
13. GAUTHIER, I., SKUDLARSKI, P., GORE, J. C., & ANDERSON, A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 191-197.
14. GOLD, J., BENNETT, P. J., & SEKULER, A. B. (1999). Signal but not noise changes with perceptual learning. Nature, 402, 176-178.
15. GOLDSTEIN, A. G., & CHANCE, J. E. (1971). Visual recognition memory for complex configurations. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 237-241.
16. GOREN, D., & WILSON, H. R. (2006). Quantifying facial expression recognition across viewing conditions. Vision Research, 46, 1253-1262.
17. GRILL-SPECTOR, K., KNOUF, N., & KANWISHER, N. (2004). The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 555-562.
18. GRONLUND, S. D. (2004). Sequential lineups: Shift in criterion or decision strategy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 362-368.
19. HOLE, G. J. (1996). Decay and interference effects in visuospatial short-term memory. Perception, 25, 53-64.
20. HUMPHREYS, M. S., PIKE, R., BAIN, J. D., & TEHAN, G. (1989). Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix, and TODAM models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 36-67.
21. HWANG, G., JACOBS, J., GELLER, A., DANKER, J., SEKULER, R., & KAHANA, M. J. (2005). EEG correlates of subvocal rehearsal in working memory. Behavioral & Brain Function, 1, 20.
22. ISAACOWITZ, D., WADLINGER, H., GOREN, D., & WILSON, H. (2006). Selective preference in visual fixation away from negative images in old age? An eye tracking study. Psychology & Aging, 21, 40-48.
23. JOHANSSON, M., MECKLINGER, A., & TREESE, A.-C. (2004). Recognition memory for emotional and neutral faces: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1840-1853.
24. JOHNSTONE, A. B., & WILLIAMS, C. (1997). Do distinctive faces come from outer space? An investigation of the status of a multidimensional face-space. Visual Cognition, 4, 59-67.
25. JOSEPH, J. E., & GATHERS, A. D. (2002). Natural and manufactured objects activate the fusiform face area. NeuroReport, 13, 935-938.
26. KAHANA, M. J., & SEKULER, R. (2002). Recognizing spatial patterns: A noisy exemplar approach. Vision Research, 42, 2177-2192.
27. KAHANA, M. J., ZHOU, F., GELLER, A. S., & SEKULER, R. (2007). Lure similarity affects visual episodic recognition: Detailed tests of a noisy exemplar model. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1222-1232.
28. KAUFMANN, J. M., & SCHWEINBERGER, S. R. (2004). Expression influences the recognition of familiar faces. Perception, 33, 399-408.
29. KLEIN, I., PARADIS, A. L., POLINE, J. B., KOSSLYN, S. M., & LE BIHAN, D. (2000). Transient activity in the human calcarine cortex during visual-mental imagery: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(Suppl. 2), 15-23.
30. KOSSLYN, S., THOMPSON, W. L., KIM, I. J., & ALPERT, N. M. (1995). Topographical representations of mental images in primary visual cortex. Nature, 378, 496-498.
31. LEE, K., BYATT, G., & RHODES, G. (2000). Caricature effects, distinctiveness, and identification: Testing the face-space hypothesis. Psychological Science, 11, 379-385.
32. LEHKY, S. R. (2000). Fine discrimination of faces can be performed rapidly. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 848-855.
33. LINDSAY, R. C., LEA, J. A., NOSWORTHY, G. J., FULFORD, J. A., HECTOR, J., LEVAN, V., & SEABROOK, C. (1991). Biased lineups: Sequential presentation reduces the problem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 796-802.
34. LOFFLER, G., GORDON, G. E., WILKINSON, F., GOREN, D., & WILSON, H. R. (2005). Configural masking of faces: Evidence for high-level interactions in face perception. Vision Research, 45, 2287-2297.
35. LOFFLER, G., YOURGANOV, G., WILKINSON, F., & WILSON, H. R. (2005). fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1386-1391.
36. LOFTUS, G. R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
37. MAGNUSSEN, S., & GREENLEE, M. W. (1999). The psychophysics of perceptual memory. Psychological Research, 62, 81-92.
38. MCKINLEY, S. C., & NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1996). Selective attention and the formation of linear decision boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 294-317.
39. MITCHELL, M. (1996). An introduction to genetic algorithms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. NÄSÄNEN, R. (1999). Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images. Vision Research, 39, 3824-3833.
41. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 104-114.
42. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
43. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 3-27.
44. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1992). Exemplar-based approach to relating categorization, identification, and recognition. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multi-dimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 363-394). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. NOSOFSKY, R. M., & KANTNER, J. (2006). Exemplar similarity, study list homogeneity, and short-term perceptual recognition. Memory & Cognition, 34, 112-124.
46. PELLI, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
47. PELLI, D. G., ROBSON, J. G., & WILKINS, A. J. (1988). Designing a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clinical Vision Sciences, 2, 187-199.
48. PETERS, R. J., GABBIANI, F., & KOCH, C. (2003). Human visual object categorization can be described by models with low memory capacity. Vision Research, 43, 2265-2280.
49. PHILLIPS, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283-290.
50. PHILLIPS, W. A. (1983). Short-term visual memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 302, 295-309.
51. PHILLIPS, W. A., & CHRISTIE, D. F. M. (1977). Components of visual memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 117-133.
52. PRINCIPLE, J. C., EULIANO, N. R., & LEFEBVRE, W. C. (2000). Neural and adaptive systems. New York: Wiley.
53. RIESENHUBER, M., JARUDI, I., GILAD, S., & SINHA, P. (2004). Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 271, S448-S450.
54. ROMNEY, A. K., BREWER, D. D., & BATCHELDER, W. H. (1993). Predicting clustering from semantic structure. Psychological Science, 4, 28-34.
55. SADR, J., JARUDI, I., & SINHA, P. (2003). The role of eyebrows in face recognition. Perception, 32, 285-293.
56. SIGALA, N., GABBIANI, F., & LOGOTHETIS, N. K. (2002). Visual categorization and object representation in monkeys and humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 187-198.
57. STEBLAY, N., DYSART, J., FULERO, S., & LINDSAY, R. C. (2001). Eye-witness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law & Human Behavior, 25, 459-473.
58. TORGERSON, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley.
59. TURTLE, J., LINDSAY, R. C., & WELLS, G. L. (2003). Best practice recommendations for eyewitness evidence procedures: New ideas for the oldest way to solve a case. Canadian Journal of Police & Security Services, 1, 5-18.
60. VALENTINE, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
61. VALENTINE, T., & BRUCE, V. (1986). The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces. Perception, 15, 525-535.
62. VALENTINE, T., & ENDO, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 671-703.
63. VISSCHER, K., KAPLAN, E., KAHANA, M. J., & SEKULER, R. (2006). Auditory short-term memory behaves like visual short-term memory. Public Library of Science Biology, 5, e56.
64. WELLER, S. C., & ROMNEY, A. K. (1988). Systematic data collection (Vol. 10). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65. WEXLER, K. N., & ROMNEY, A. K. (1972). Individual variations in cognitive structures. In A. K. Romney, R. M. Shepard, & M. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 73-92). New York: Seminar Press.
66. WILSON, H. R., LOFFLER, G., & WILKINSON, F. (2002). Synthetic faces, face cubes, and the geometry of face space. Vision Research, 42, 2909-2923.
67. YOTSUMOTO, Y., KAHANA, M. J., WILSON, H. R., & SEKULER, R. (2004). Preliminary studies of recognition memory for synthetic faces (Tech. Rep. 2004-3). Waltham, MA: Brandeis University, Visual Cognition Laboratory, Volen Center for Complex Systems.
68. ZHOU, F., KAHANA, M. J., & SEKULER, R. (2004). Short-term episodic memory for visual textures: A roving probe gathers some memory. Psychological Science, 153, 112-118.