64-Slice CT for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review

American Journal of Medicine

Volumn 121, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 715-725

  Stein, Paul D ^a,b   Yaekoub, Abdo Y ^a   Matta, Fadi ^a   Sostman, H Dirk ^c  

^a ST JOSEPH MERCY OAKLAND HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY CIRCUMFLEX BRANCH; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 48449089390     PISSN: 00029343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.02.039     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Gallagher M.J., Ross M.A., Raff G.L., et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients. Ann Emerg Med 49 (2007) 125-136
2. Lijmer J.G., Mol B.W., Heisterkamp S., et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 282 (1999) 1061-1066
3. Cook D.J., Mulrow C.D., and Haynes R.B. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 126 (1997) 376-380
4. Bossuyt P.M., Reitsma J.B., Bruns D.E., et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 138 (2003) W1-W12
5. Raff G.L., Gallagher M.J., O'Neill W.W., and Goldstein J.A. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 552-557
6. Mollet N.R., Cademartiri F., van Mieghem C.A., et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112 (2005) 2318-2323
7. Pugliese F., Mollet N.R., Runza G., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 575-582
8. Ehara M., Surmely J.F., Kawai M., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 70 (2006) 564-571
9. Herzog C., Zwerner P.L., Doll J.R., et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 244 (2007) 112-120
10. Brodoefel H., Reimann A., Burgstahler C., et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Radiol 66 (2008) 134-141
11. Ehara M., Kawai M., Surmely J.F., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007) 951-959
12. Rixe J., Achenbach S., Ropers D., et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 27 (2006) 2567-2572
13. Rist C., von Ziegler F., Nikolaou K., et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography. Acad Radiol 13 (2006) 1465-1473
14. Das K.M., El-Menyar A.A., Salam A.M., et al. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. Radiology 245 (2007) 424-432
15. Meyer T.S., Martinoff S., Hadamitzky M., et al. Improved noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with 64-slice computed tomographic angiography in an unselected patient population. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007) 946-950
16. Onuma Y., Tanabe K., Chihara R., et al. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Am Heart J 154 (2007) 519-526
17. Nikolaou K., Knez A., Rist C., et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 (2006) 111-117
18. Leber A.W., Knez A., von Ziegler F., et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 147-154
19. Malagutti P., Nieman K., Meijboom W.B., et al. Use of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after coronary bypass surgery: evaluation of grafts and coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 28 (2007) 1879-1885
20. Schepis T., Koepfli P., Leschka S., et al. Coronary artery stent geometry and in-stent contrast attenuation with 64-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 17 (2007) 1464-1473
21. Ropers D., Pohle F.K., Kuettner A., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation 114 (2006) 2334-2341
22. Ropers D., Rixe J., Anders K., et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- × 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 97 (2006) 343-348
23. Meijboom W.B., Mollet N.R., van Mieghem C.A., et al. 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart 93 (2007) 1386-1392
24. Cademartiri F., Schuijf J.D., Pugliese F., et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007) 2204-2210
25. Caussin C., Larchez C., Ghostine S., et al. Comparison of coronary minimal lumen area quantification by sixty-four-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for intermediate stenosis. Am J Cardiol 98 (2006) 871-876
26. Hausleiter J., Meyer T., Hadamitzky M., et al. Non-invasive coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the Coronary Angiography by Computed Tomography with the Use of a Submillimeter resolution (CACTUS) trial. Eur Heart J 28 (2007) 3034-3041
27. Meijboom W.B., Weustink A.C., Pugliese F., et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in women versus men with angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 100 (2007) 1532-1537
28. Hacker M., Jakobs T., Hack N., et al. Sixty-four slice spiral CT angiography does not predict the functional relevance of coronary artery stenoses in patients with stable angina. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34 (2007) 4-10
29. Schlosser T., Mohrs O.K., Magedanz A., et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-detector-row computed tomography in patients with a low to moderate pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. Acta Radiol 48 (2007) 300-307
30. Oncel D., Oncel G., and Karaca M. Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography-initial experience. Radiology 242 (2007) 403-409
31. Oncel D., Oncel G., Tastan A., and Tamci B. Detection of significant coronary artery stenosis with 64-section MDCT angiography. Eur J Radiol 62 (2007) 394-405
32. Pundziute G., Schuijf J.D., Jukema J.W., et al. Gender influence on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease. Heart 94 (2008) 48-52
33. Shabestari A.A., Abdi S., Akhlaghpoor S., et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-channel multislice computed tomography in assessment of significant coronary artery disease in symptomatic subjects. Am J Cardiol 99 (2007) 1656-1661
34. Mühlenbruch G., Seyfarth T., Soo C.S., et al. Diagnostic value of 64-slice multi-detector row cardiac CTA in symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol 17 (2007) 603-609
35. Ong T.K., Chin S.P., Liew C.K., et al. Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification. Am Heart J 151 (2006) 1323.e1-1323.e6
36. Jabara R., Chronos N., Klein L., et al. Comparison of multidetector 64-slice computed tomographic angiography to coronary angiography to assess the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Am J Cardiol 9911 (2007) 1529-1534
37. Schuijf J.D., Pundziute G., Jukema J.W., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 98 (2006) 145-148
38. Carbone I., Francone M., Algeri E., et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography. Eur Radiol 18 (2008) 234-243
39. Leschka S., Scheffel H., Desbiolles L., et al. Combining dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring: added value for the assessment of coronary artery disease. Heart (2007) [Epub ahead of print]
40. Xiao Y., Tian J.M., Gong J., et al. [Screening for consecutive patient population with suspected CAD by 64-slice CT coronary angiography]. [Chinese]. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 41 Suppl (2007) 134-137
41. Cademartiri F., Maffei E., Palumbo A.A., et al. Influence of intra-coronary enhancement on diagnostic accuracy with 64-slice CT coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18 (2008) 576-583
42. Ye H.H., Kaneda H., Saito S., et al. [Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of coronary plaques with 64-slice computed tomography in comparison with intravascular ultrasound]. [Chinese]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 35 (2007) 648-651
43. Leschka S., Alkadhi H., Plass A., et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26 (2005) 1482-1487
44. Fine J.J., Hopkins C.B., Ruff N., and Newton F.C. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 97 (2006) 173-174
45. Ghostine S., Caussin C., Daoud B., et al. Non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block using 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 1929-1934
46. Meijboom W.B., Mollet N.R., Van Mieghem C.A., et al. Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 1658-1665
47. Scheffel H., Leschka S., Plass A., et al. Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for the preoperative detection of coronary artery disease in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 100 (2007) 701-706
48. Plass A., Grunenfelder J., Leschka S., et al. Coronary artery imaging with 64-slice computed tomography from cardiac surgical perspective. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30 (2006) 109-116
49. Van Mieghem C.A., Thury A., Meijboom W.B., et al. Detection and characterization of coronary bifurcation lesions with 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Heart J 28 (2007) 1968-1976
50. Austen W.G., Edwards J.E., Frye R.L., et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51 (1975) 5-40
51. Stein P.D., Beemath A., Kayali F., et al. Multidetector CT for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Am J Med 119 (2006) 203-216
52. Accuracy Matrix. http://www.chestx-ray.com/Statistics/TwobyTwo.html Accessed February 4, 2008
53. Stein P.D., Beemath A., Skaf E., et al. Usefulness of 4-, 8-, and 16-slice computed tomography for detection of graft occlusion or patency after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 96 (2005) 1669-1673
54. Sox H.C. Commentary. Ann Intern Med 140 (2004) 602
55. Jaeschke R., Guyatt G.H., and Sackett D.L. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 271 (1994) 703-707
56. Einstein A.J., Henzlova M.J., and Rajagopalan. Estimation of risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298 (2007) 317-323