Limitations of 64-detector-row computed tomography coronary angiography: Calcium and motion but not short experience

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 174-180

  Mir Akbari, H ^b   Ripsweden, J ^b   Jensen, J ^b   Pichler, P ^b   Sylven C ^b   Cederlund, K ^b   Ruck A ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Angiography; Cardiac; CT angiography; Heart

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; BIOMINERALIZATION; BONE; CALCIUM; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DETECTORS; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; HEMODYNAMICS; IMAGE QUALITY; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SIGNAL RECONSTRUCTION; TOMOGRAPHY;

CARDIAC; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHIES; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGES; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; DIAGNOSTIC SCANS; GE HEALTHCARES; HEART; HEART RATES; LIGHTSPEED; LOW CONTRASTS; MOTION ARTIFACTS; NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS; OPACIFICATION; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES;

ANEMOMETERS;

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 61449146359     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850802647013     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB, Clark DA, Cusma JT, Dehmer GJ, et al. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:2170-214.
2. Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M, Ell PJ, Flint EJ, Harbinson M, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:261-91.
3. Hoilund-Carlsen PF, Johansen A, Christensen HW, Vach W, Moldrup M, Bartram P, et al. Potential impact of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy as gatekeeper for invasive examination and treatment in patients with stable angina pectoris: observational study without posttest referral bias. Eur Heart J 2006;27:29-34.
4. Madler CF, Payne N, Wilkenshoff U, Cohen A, Derumeaux GA, Pierard LA, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease by quantitative stress echocardiography: optimal diagnostic models using off-line tissue Doppler in the MYDISE study. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1584-94.
5. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, Chaitman BR, Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). Circulation 2002;106:1883-92.
6. Togni M, Balmer F, Pfiffner D, Maier W, Zeiher AM, Meier B. Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe 1992-2001. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1208-13.
7. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grunenfelder J, Marincek B, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482-7.
8. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552-7.
9. Mollet MR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, Runza G, McFadden EP, Baks T, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005;112:2318-23.
10. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M, Katoh O, Matsubara T, Terashima M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 2006;70:564-71.
11. Roberts WT, Bax JJ, Davies LC. Cardiac CT and CT coronary angiography: technology and application. Heart 2008;94:781-92.
12. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Zankl M, Gerein P, Dorrler K, et al. Non-invasive coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the coronary angiography by computed tomography with the use of a submillimeter resolution (CACTUS) trial. Eur Heart J 2007;28:3034-41.
13. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976; 16:31-41.
14. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51:5-40.
15. Meijboom WB, Weustink AC, Pugliese F, van Mieghem CA, Mollet NR, van Pelt N, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in women versus men with angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1532-7.
16. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C, Wintersperger BJ, Leber A, Johnson T, et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:111-7.
17. Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Burgstahler C, Schumacher F, Herberts T, Tsiflikas I, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Radiol 2008;66:134-41.
18. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Plass A, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006;241:378-85.
19. Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, van Werkhoven JM, Boersma E, de Roos A, et al. Gender influence on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease. Heart 2008;94:48-52.
20. Lindstaedt M, Spiecker M, Perings C, Lawo T, Yazar A, Holland-Letz T, et al. How good are experienced interventional cardiologists at predicting the functional significance of intermediate or equivocal left main coronary artery stenoses? Int J Cardiol 2007;120:254-61.
21. Fischer JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA, Sarembock IJ, Powers ER, Gimple LW, et al. Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:210-5.
22. Busch S, Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F, Knez A, Reiser MF, et al. Visual and automatic grading of coronary artery stenoses with 64-slice CT angiography in reference to invasive angiography. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1445-51.
23. Tobis J, Azarbal B, Slavin L. Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:839-48.
24. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B. Coronary pressure measurement and fractional flow reserve. Heart 1998;80:539-42.
25. Husmann L, Valenta 1, Gaemperli O, Adda O, Treyer V, Wyss CA, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 2008;29:191-7.
26. Hjemdahl P, Eriksson SV, Held C, Forslund L, Nasman P, Rehnqvist N. Favourable long term prognosis in stable angina pectoris: an extended follow up of the angina prognosis study in Stockholm (APSIS). Heart 2006;92:177-82.