Problem-based learning for professionalism and scientific integrity training of biomedical graduate students: Process evaluation

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 36, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 620-626

  Jones, Nancy L ^a,b   Peiffer, Ann M ^a   Lambros, Ann ^a   Eldridge, J Charles ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b TRINITY EVANGELICAL DIVINITY SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; ETHICS; EVALUATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; ETHICS, MEDICAL; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 77958085101     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2009.035238     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Powell ST, Allison MA, Kalichman MW. Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study. Sci Eng Ethics 2007;13:249-64.
2. Bebeau MJ, Thoma SJ. The impact of a dental ethics curriculum on moral reasoning. J Dent Educ 1994;58:684-92.
3. Clarkeburn H, Downie JR, Matthew B. Impact of an ethics programme in a life sciences curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education 2002;7:65-79.
4. Kalichman MW, Friedman PJ. A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics. Acad Med 1992;67:769-75.
5. Mumford MD, Connelly S, Brown RP, et al. A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics Behav 2008;18:315-39.
6. Anderson MS, Horn AS, Risbey KR, et al. What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists. Acad Med 2007;82:853-60.
7. Brookfield S. Understanding and facilitating adult learning: A comprehensive analysis of principles and effective practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1986.
8. Cross K. Adults are learners: increasing participation and facilitating learning. San Franscisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1981.
9. Knowles M. The modern practice of adult education: andragagy versus pedagogy. New York, NY: New York Association Press, 1970.
10. Bebeau MJ, Pimple KD, Muskavitch KMT, et al. Moral reasoning in scientific research: cases for teaching and assessment. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Poynter Center, 1995.
11. Iserson KV. Principles of biomedical ethics. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1999;17:283e306 ix.
12. Kalichman MW, Plemmons DK. Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses. Acad Med 2007;82:846-52.
13. Steneck NH, Bulger RE. The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Acad Med 2007;82:829-34.
14. Braunschweiger P, Goodman KW. The CITI program: an international online resource for education in human subjects protection and the responsible conduct of research. Acad Med 2007;82:861-4.
15. Bulger RE, Heitman E. Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the university. Acad Med 2007;82:876-8.
16. Kalichman MW. Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research. Acad Med 2007;82:870-5.
17. Anderson MS. Collective openness and other recommendations for the promotion of research integrity. Sci Eng Ethics 2007;13:387-94.
18. Plemmons DK, Brody SA, Kalichman MW. Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research. Sci Eng Ethics 2006;12:571-82.
19. Peiffer AM, Laurienti PJ, Hugenschmidt CE. Fostering a culture of responsible lab conduct. Science 2008;322:1186.