Collective openness and other recommendations for the promotion of research integrity

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 387-394

  Anderson, Melissa S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; UNITED STATES;

ETHICS, RESEARCH; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 36949037516     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 16605454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-007-9047-0     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. World conference on research integrity. (2007). [website]. Available at: http://www.esf.org/activities/esf-conferences/details/confdetail242/ conference-information.html. Accessed October 10, 2007.
2. Anderson, M. S, Horn, A, Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior?: Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine, 82, 853-860.
3. Office of research integrity. (2007). [website]. Available at: http://ori.dhhs.gov/. Accessed October 10, 2007.
4. Steneck, N. H. (2004). ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research. Washington, D.C.: U.S Government Printing Office.
5. Kalichman, M. W. (2007). Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 870-875.
6. Bird, S. J. (1999). Including ethics in graduate education in scientific research. In J. M. Braxton & M. F. Fox (Eds.), Perspectives on scholarly misconduct in the sciences (pp. 174-188). Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
7. Macrina, F. L. (2005). Scientific integrity: Text and cases in responsible conduct of research, 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology Press.
8. Bulger, R. E., Heitman, E., Reiser, S. J. (Eds.). (2002). The ethical dimensions of the biological and health sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B. (2003). Responsible conduct of research. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Braunschweiger, P., & Goodman K. W. (2007). The CITI program: An international online resource for education in human subjects protection and the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 861-864.
11. Bird, S. J., & Sieber, J. E. (2005). Teaching ethics in science and engineering: Effective online education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 323-328.
12. Sieber, J. E. (2005). Misconceptions and realities about teaching online. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 329-340.
13. De Vries, R., Anderson, M. S., & Martinson, B. C. (2006). Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 43-50.
14. Heitman, E. (2000). Ethical values in the education of biomedical researchers. The Hastings Center Report, 30(4), S40-S44.
15. Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., de Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007) The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships, Science and Engineering Ethics 13(4).
16. Gunsalus, C. K. (1998). Preventing the need for whistleblowing: Practical advice for university administrators. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4(1), 75-94.
17. Grinnell, F. (2002). The impact of ethics on research. Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(6), B15.