Seeing with the hands and with the eyes: The contributions of haptic cues to anatomical shape recognition in surgery

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-10-02, Issue , 2010, Pages 8-14

  Keehner, Madeleine ^a   Lowe, Richard K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL SHAPE; ANATOMICAL STRUCTURES; FUTURE CHALLENGES; MEDICAL EXPERTS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; SENSORY CONDITIONS; SURGICAL METHOD; VISUAL CUES;

SURGERY;

EID: 77957942001     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Atkins, J. E., Fiser, J, & Jacobs, R. A. (2001). Experience-dependent visual cue integration based on consistencies between visual and haptic percepts. Vision Research, 41(4), 449-461.
2. Ballesteros, S., Reales, J. M, & Manga, D. (1999). Implicit and explicit memory for familiar and novel objects presented to touch. Psicothema, 11(4), 785-800.
3. Berkelman, P. J., and Whitcomb., L. L., Taylor, R. H. & Jensen, P. (2003). A miniature microsurgical instrument tip force sensor for enhanced force feedback during robot-assisted manipulation," Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions, 19,917-922.
4. Bholat, O. S., and Haluck., R. S., Kutz, R. S., Gorman, P. J., & Krummel, T. M. (1999). Defining the role of haptic feedback in minimally invasive surgery. J. D. Westwood et al. (Eds), Medicine Meets Virtual Reality. IOS Press.
5. Cuscieri, A. (2005). Laparoscopic surgery: Current status, issues and future developments. The Surgeon, 3(3), 125-138.
6. Dekker, S. W. & Hugh, T. B. (2008). Laparoscopic bile duct injury: Understanding the psychology and heuristics of the error. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 78(12), 1109-1114.
7. Diebert, E., Kraut, M., Kremen, S., & Hart, J. (1999). Neural pathways in tactile object recognition. Neurology, 52(7), 1413-1417.
8. Easton, R. D., and Greene., A. J., & Srinivas, K. (1999). Transfer between vision and haptics: Memory for 2-D patterns and 3-D objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(3), 403-410.
9. Easton, R. D., Srinivas, K., & Greene, A. J. (1997). Do vision and haptics share common representations? Implicit and explicit memory within and between modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 23(1), 153-163.
10. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans Integrate Visual and Haptic Information in a Statistically Optimal Fashion. Nature 415, 429-433.
11. Ernst, M. O., and Banks., M. S., & Buelthoff, H. H. (2000). Touch can change visual slant perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3(1), 69-73.
12. Ernst, M. O., Lange, C., & Newell, F. N. (2007). Multisensory Recognition of Actively Explored Objects. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(3), 242-253.
13. Garg, A. X., Norman, G., & Sperotable, L. (2001). How medical students learn spatial anatomy. The Lancet, 357, 363-364.
14. Grazanio, M. S. A., & Gross, C. G. (1993). A bimodal map of space - somatosensory receptive-fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive-fields. Experimental Brain Research, 97(1), 96-109.
15. Hay, J. C., and Pick., H. L., & Ikeda, K. (1965). Visual capture produced by prism spectacles. Psychonomic Science, 2, 215-216.
16. Hegarty, M., Keehner, M, Khooshabeh, P., & Montello, D. R. (2009). How spatial abilities enhance, and are enhanced by, dental education. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 61-70.
17. Heller, M. A., and Calcaterra., J. A., Green, S. L., & Brown, L. (1999). Intersensory conflict between vision and touch: The response modality dominates when precise, attention-riveting judgments are required. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(7), 1384-1398.
18. Hershberger, W. A., & Misceo, G. F. (1996). Touch dominates haptic estimates of discordant visual-haptic size. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(7), 1124-1132.
19. Just, S. B. (1979). Spatial reasoning ability as related to achievement in a dental school curriculum (Unpublished Ed.D. dissertation). New Jersey: Rutgers University.
20. Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurons. Neuroreport, 7, 2325-2330.
21. Kappers AML, Koenderink JJ, & Oudenaarden G. (1997). Large scale difference between haptic and visual judgements of curvature. Perception, 26, 313-320.
22. Klatzky, R. L., & Lederman, S. J. (1987). The intelligent hand. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 121-151). San Diego: Academic Press.
23. Klatzky, R.L. & Lederman, S.J. (1999). The haptic glance: A route to rapid object identification and manipulation. In D. Gopher & A. Koriats (Eds.) Attention and Performance XVII. Cognitive regulations of performance: Interaction of theory and application, (pp. 165-196). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
24. Klatzky, R.L., Lederman, S.J., & Metzger, V. (1985). Identifying objects by touch: An "expert system". Perception & Psvchophvsics. 37(4), 299-302.
25. Klatzky, R.L., Lederman, S.J., & Reed, C. (1987). There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. Journal Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 356-369.
26. Klatzky, R. L., and Loomis., J. M., Lederman, S. J., Wake, H., & Fujita, N. (1993). Haptic identification of objects and their depictions. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 170-178.
27. Kron, A. & Schmidt, G. (2003). Multi-fingered Tactile Feedback from Virtual and Remote Environments. Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.
28. Lederman, S.J. & Klatzky, R.L. (2009). Haptic perception: A tutorial. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(7), 1439-1459.
29. Lederman, S. J., Summers, C., & Klatzky, R. L. (1996). Cognitive salience of haptic object properties: Role of modality-encoding bias. Perception, 25(8), 983-998.
30. Leinonen, L., Hyvarinen, J., Nyman, G., & Linnankoski, I. (1979). Functional properties of neurons in lateral part of associative area 7 in awake monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 34, 299-320. (Pubitemid 9249376)
31. Lowe, R.K., & Keehner, M. (2008). Look and Feel: Searching Visual and Tactile Graphics. Paper presented at the HCSNet workshop on Embodied Interaction in Mobile, Physical and Virtual Environments, Sydney.
32. Maravita, A., Spence, C., Kennett, S., & Driver, J. (2002). Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition, 83, B25-B34.
33. Newell, F. N., and Ernst., M. O., Tjan, B. S., & Bultoff, H. H. (2001). Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychological Science, 12(1), 37-42.
34. Pavani, F., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11(5), 353-359.
35. Press, C., Bird, G., Flach, R., & Heyes, C., (2005). Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 25, 632-640.
36. Press C., Gillmeister H., & Heyes C. (2007). Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274:2639-44
37. Reales, J. M., & Ballesteros, S. (1999). Implicit and explicit memory for visual and haptic objects: Cross-modal priming depends on structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: LMC., 25(3), 644-663.
38. Rochford, K. (1985). Spatial learning disabilities and underachievement among university anatomy sudents. Medical Education, 79(1), 13-26.
39. Rock, I., & Victor, J. (1964). Vision and touch: An experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science, 143, 594-596.
40. Stull, A. T., Hegarty, M. & Mayer, R. E. (2009). Getting a handle on learning anatomy with interactive three-dimensional graphics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 707(4), 803-816.
41. Tarr, M. J., Williams, P; Hayward, W. G. Gauthier, I. (1998). Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent. Nature Neuroscience, 7(4), 275-277.
42. Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Mackenzie, R., Lozano. S., & Morrison, J. (2008). Enriching animations. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.). Learning with animations: Research implications for design, (pp. 263-285). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Warren, D. H., & Rossano, M. J. (1991). Intermodality relations: Vision and touch. In M. A. Heller & W. Schiff (Eds.), The psychology of touch (pp. 119-137). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638-667.
45. Zangaladze, A., and Epstein., C. M., Grafton, S. T., & Sathian, K. (1999). Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation. Nature, 407 (6753), 587-590.