Sounds move a static visual object

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2010, Pages

  Teramoto, Wataru ^a   Hidaka, Souta ^b   Sugita, Yoichi ^c  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b RIKKYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE MOVEMENT; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; RETINA; SOUND; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ILLUSION; MOTION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MOTION; SOUND; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77957915559     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012255     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Sekuler R, Sekuler AB, Lau R (1997) Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature 385: 308.
2. Shimojo S, Miyauchi S, Hikosaka O (1997) Visual motion sensation yielded by non-visually driven attention. Vision Res 37: 1575-1580.
3. Watanabe K, Shimojo S (2001) When sound affects vision: effects of auditory grouping on visual motion perception. Psychol Sci 12: 109-116.
4. Freeman E, Driver J (2008) Direction of visual apparent motion driven solely by timing of a static sound. Curr Biol 18: 1262-1266.
5. Hidaka S, Manaka Y, Teramoto W, Sugita Y, Miyauchi R, et al. (2009) Alternation of sound location induces visual motion perception of a static object. Plos ONE 4: e8188. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008188.
6. Teramoto W, Manaka Y, Hidaka S, Sugita Y, Miyauchi R, et al. (2010) Visual motion perception induced by sounds in vertical plane. Neurosci Lett In press.
7. Lewis JW, Beauchamp MS, DeYoe EA (2000) A comparison of visual and auditory motion processing in human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 10: 873-888.
8. Alink A, Singer W, Muckli L (2008) Capture of auditory motion by vision is represented by an activation shift from auditory to visual motion cortex. J Neurosci 28: 2690-2697.
9. Alais D, Burr D (2004) The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Curr Biol 14: 257-262.
10. Alais D, Burr D (2004) No direction-specific bimodal facilitation for audiovisual motion detection. Brain Res: Cog Brain Res 19: 185-194.
11. Meyer GF, Wuerger SM (2001) Cross-modal integration of auditory and visual motion signals. Neuroreport 12: 2557-2560.
12. Soto-Faraco S, Spence C, Kingstone A (2004) Cross-modal dynamic capture: Congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities. J Exp Psychol: Human Percept Perform 30: 330-345.
13. Favreau OE, Emerson VF, Corballis MC (1972) Motion perception: a colorcontingent aftereffect. Science 176: 78-79.
14. Dong CJ, Swindale NV, Cynader MS (1999) A contingent aftereffect in the auditory system. Nature Neurosci 2: 863-865.
15. Vroomen J, de Gelder B (2003) Visual motion influences the contingent auditory motion aftereffect. Psychol Sci 14: 357-361.
16. Haijiang Q, Saunders JA, Stone RW, Backus BT (2006) Demonstration of cue recruitment: Change in visual appearance by means of Pavlovian conditioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 483-488.
17. Backus BT, Haijiang Q (2007) Competition between newly recruited and preexisting visual cues during the construction of visual appearance. Vision Res 47: 919-924.
18. Seitz AR, Dinse HR (2007) A common framework for perceptual learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17: 148-153.
19. Shams L, Seitz AR (2008) Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends Cogn Sci 12: 411-417.