When Sound Affects Vision: Effects of Auditory Grouping on Visual Motion Perception

Psychological Science

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 109-116

  Watanabe, Katsumi ^a   Shimojo, Shinsuke ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SOUND; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; COGNITION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SOUND; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035291353     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00319     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bertenthal, B.I., Banton, T., & Bradbury, A. (1993). Directional bias in the perception of translating patterns. Perception, 22, 193-207.
2. Bregman, A.S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Bregman, A.S., & Campbell, J. (1971). Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 244-249.
4. Calvert, G.A., Brammer, M.J., & Iversen, S.D. (1998). Crossmodal identification. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 247-253.
5. Dowling, W.J. (1968). Rhythmic fission and perceptual organization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 369.
6. Driver, J., & Spence, C. (1998). Attention and the cross modal construction of space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 254-262.
7. Freeman, W.T. (1994). The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception. Nature, 368, 542-545.
8. Gaver, W.W. (1993a). How in the world do we hear? Exploration in ecological acoustics. Ecological Psychology, 5, 285-313.
9. Gaver, W.W. (1993b). What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology, 5, 1-29.
10. Goldberg, D.M., & Pomerantz, J.R. (1982). Models of illusory pausing and sticking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 547-561.
11. Howard, I.P., & Templeton, W.B. (1966). Human spatial orientation. London: Wiley.
12. Knill, D.C., Kersten, D., & Yuille, A. (1996). Introduction: A Bayesian formulation of visual perception. In D.C. Knill & W. Richards (Eds.), Perception as Bayesian inference (pp. 1-21). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13. Lüscher, E., & Zwislocki, J. (1947). The decay of sensation and the reminder of adaptation after short pure tone impulses on the ear. Acta Otolaryngologia, 35, 428-446.
14. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: W.H. Freeman.
15. Massaro, D.W. (1970). Retroactive interference in short-term recognition memory for pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 32-39.
16. Massaro, D.W. (1975). Backward recognition masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58, 1059-1065.
17. Massaro, D.W., Cohen, M.C., & Idson, W.L. (1976). Recognition masking of auditory lateralization and pitch judgments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 434-441.
18. McAdams, S. (1984). The auditory image: A metaphor for musical and psychological research on auditory organization. In W.P. Crozier & A.J. Chapman (Eds.), Cognitive process in the perception of art (pp. 289-323). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
19. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J.W. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
20. Metzger, W. (1934). Beobachtungen über phänomenale Identität. Psyhologische Forschung, 19, 1-60.
21. Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality (T.R. Miles & E. Miles, Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1946)
22. Miller, G.A., & Heise, G.A. (1950). The trill threshold. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 637-638.
23. Nakayama, K., & Shimojo, S. (1992). Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. Science, 257, 1357-1363.
24. Richards, W. (1988). The approach. In W. Richards (Ed.), Natural computation (pp. 3-17). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Schröger, E., Tervaniemi, M., Wolff, C., & Näätänen, R.N. (1996). Preattentive periodicity detection in auditory patterns as governed by time and intensity information. Cognitive Brain Research, 4, 145-148.
26. Sekuler, A.B., & Sekuler, R. (1999). Collisions between moving visual targets: What controls alternative ways of seeing an ambiguous display? Perception, 28, 415-432.
27. Sekuler, R., Sekuler, A.B., & Lau, R. (1997). Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature, 385, 308.
28. Stevens, S.S., & Davis, H. (1938). Hearing: Its psychology and physiology. New York: Wiley.
29. Sumi, S. (1995). Bounce effect seen in opposite motions. Japanese Psychological Research, 37, 195-200.
30. Viemeister, N.F., & Plack, C.J. (1993). Time analysis. In W.A. Yost, A.N. Popper, & R.R. Fay (Eds.), Human psychophysics (pp. 116-154). New York: Springer.
31. Watanabe, K., Scheier, C., Lewkowicz, D.J., & Shimojo, S. (1999, October). Temporal window for audiovisual interaction revealed with an ambiguous motion display. Poster presented at the Experimental Psychology Society Workshop on Crossmodal Attention and Multisensory Integration, Oxford, England.
32. Watanabe, K., & Shimojo, S. (1998). Attentional modulation in perception of visual motion events. Perception, 27, 1041-1054.
33. Watanabe, K., & Shimojo S. (1999, March). Temporal window for audiovisual integration revealed with bistable motion display. Poster presented at the Joint Symposium on Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, Elat, Israel.
34. Watanabe, K., & Shimujo, S. (2001). Postcoincidence trajectory duration affects motion event perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 16-28.