Competition between newly recruited and pre-existing visual cues during the construction of visual appearance

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 919-924

  Backus, Benjamin T ^a   Haijiang, Qi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular disparity; Cue combination; Cue learning; Cue recruitment; Necker cube

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE POSITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; ROTATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

CUES; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; LEARNING; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINA; ROTATION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33847628006     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adams W.J., and Mamassian P. Bayesian combination of ambiguous shape cues. Journal of Vision 4 (2004) 921-929
2. Ahissar M., and Hochstein S. The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (2004) 457-464
3. Anstis S.M., and Harris J.P. Movement aftereffects contingent on binocular disparity. Perception 3 (1974) 153-168
4. Backus B.T., and Banks M.S. Estimator reliability and distance scaling in stereoscopic slant perception. Perception 28 (1999) 217-242
5. Backus B.T., Banks M.S., van Ee R., and Crowell J.A. Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception. Vision Research 39 (1999) 1143-1170
6. Backus B.T., Fleet D.J., Parker A.J., and Heeger D.J. Human cortical activity correlates with stereoscopic depth perception. Journal of Neurophysiology 86 (2001) 2054-2068
7. Backus B.T., and Matza-Brown D. The contribution of vergence change to the measurement of relative disparity. Journal of Vision 3 (2003) 737-750
8. Banks M.S., and Backus B.T. Extra-retinal and perspective cues cause the small range of the induced effect. Vision Research 38 (1998) 187-194
9. Bradley D.C., Chang G.C., and Andersen R.A. Encoding of three-dimensional structure-from-motion by primate area MT neurons. Nature 392 (1998) 714-717
10. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. In (pp. 92, 96, 123-131). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11. Buell T.N., and Hafter E.R. Combination of binaural information across frequency bands. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90 (1991) 1894-1900
12. Carter O.L., and Pettigrew J.D. A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries? Perception 32 (2003) 295-305
13. Clark J.J., and Yuille A.L. Data fusion for sensory information processing systems (1990), Kluwer, Boston
14. DeAngelis G.C., and Newsome W.T. Organization of disparity-selective neurons in macaque area MT. Journal of Neuroscience 19 (1999) 1398-1415
15. Dodd J.V., Krug K., Cumming B.G., and Parker A.J. Perceptually bistable three-dimensional figures evoke high choice probabilities in cortical area MT. Journal of Neuroscience 21 (2001) 4809-4821
16. Dosher B.A., Sperling G., and Wurst S.A. Tradeoffs between stereopsis and proximity luminance covariance as determinants of perceived 3D structure. Vision Research 26 (1986) 973-990
17. Eby D.W., Loomis J.M., and Solomon E.M. Perceptual linkage of multiple objects rotating in depth. Perception 18 (1989) 427-444
18. Efron B., and Tibshirani R.J. An introduction to the bootstrap. Monographs on statistics and applied probability 57 (1993), Chapman & Hall, New York
19. Finney D.J. Probit analysis (1971), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
20. Geisler W.S., and Kersten D. Illusions, perception and Bayes. Nature Neuroscience 5 (2002) 508-510
21. Haijiang Q., Saunders J.A., Stone R.W., and Backus B.T. Demonstration of cue recruitment: change in visual appearance by means of Pavlovian conditioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 (2006) 483-488
22. Hebb D.O. Organization of Behavior (1949), Wiley, New York
23. Helmholtz H.v. Treatise on Physiological Optics Vol. III (1910-1925), Optical Society of America, New York
24. Hochberg, J. E., & Krantz, D. (2004). Brunswik and Bayes: A Review of the Essential Brunswik: Beginnings, Explications, Applications, by Kenneth R. Hammond, Thomas R. Stewart (pp. 785-787). New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books, 49.
25. Huk A.C., Ress D., and Heeger D.J. Neuronal basis of the motion aftereffect reconsidered. Neuron 32 (2001) 161-172
26. Johnston E.B., Cumming B.G., and Parker A.J. Integration of depth modules: stereopsis and texture. Vision Research 33 (1993) 813-826
27. Kersten D., Mamassian P., and Yuille A. Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annual Review of Psychology 55 (2004) 271-304
28. Knill D.C., and Richards W. Perception as Bayesian Inference (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
29. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E.B., and Young M. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Research 35 (1995) 389-412
30. Lewis D.D. Naive Bayes at forty: the independence assumption in information retrieval. Tenth European Conference on Machine Learning (1998), Springer, Berlin 4-15
31. Long G.M., Toppino T.C., and Kostenbauder J.F. As the cube turns: evidence for two processes in the perception of a dynamic reversible figure. Perception & Psychophysics 34 (1983) 29-38
32. Long G.M., and Toppino T.C. A new twist on the rotating-trapezoid illusion: evidence for neural-adaptation effects. Perception 23 (1994) 619-634
33. Maloney L.T. Statistical decision theory and biological vision. Perception and the Physical World (2002), Wiley, Chichester, UK 145-189
34. Mamassian P., and Goutcher R. Temporal dynamics in bistable perception. Journal of Vision 5 (2005) 361-375
35. Mayhew J.E., and Anstis S.M. Movement aftereffects contingent on color, intensity, and pattern. Perception & Psychophysics 12 (1972) 77-85
36. Nawrot M., and Blake R. The interplay between stereopsis and structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics 49 (1991) 230-244
37. Schlack A., and Albright T.D. Associative Learning in cortical visual area MT of macaque monkeys. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts (2005) 31
38. van Ee R., Adams W.J., and Mamassian P. Bayesian modeling of cue interaction: bistability in stereoscopic slant perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A-Optics Image Science and Vision 20 (2003) 1398-1406
39. Wallach H., and Austin P. Recognition and the localization of visual traces. American Journal of Psychology 67 (1954) 338-340
40. Weiss Y., Simoncelli E.P., and Adelson E.H. Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience 5 (2002) 598-604
41. Young M.J., Landy M.S., and Maloney L.T. A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues. Vision Research 33 (1993) 2685-2696