Visual motion perception induced by sounds in vertical plane

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 479, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 221-225

  Teramoto, Wataru ^a   Manaka, Yuko ^b   Hidaka, Souta ^a   Sugita, Yoichi ^b   Miyauchi, Ryota ^a   Sakamoto, Shuichi ^a   Gyoba, Jiro ^a   Iwaya, Yukio ^a   Suzuki, Yôiti ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

Audio visual interaction; Auditory spectral cue; Binaural cue; Motion perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOLUNTEER; SOUND;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; CUES; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; SOUND;

EID: 77954145106     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.065     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alais D., Burr D. The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:257-262.
2. Alink A., Singer W., Muckli L. Capture of auditory motion by vision is represented by an activation shift from auditory to visual motion cortex. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:2690-2697.
3. Asano F., Suzuki Y., Sone T. Role of spectral cues in median plane localization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1990, 88:159-168.
4. Baumann O., Greenlee M.W. Neural correlates of coherent audiovisual motion perception. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:1433-1443.
5. Blauert J. Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization 1983, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 1997, 10:433-436.
7. Bremmer F., Schlack A., Shah N.J., Zafiris O., Kubischik M., Hoffmann K., Zilles K., Fink G.R. Polymodal motion processing in posterior parietal and premotor cortex: a human fMRI study strongly implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron 2001, 29:287-296.
8. Daniel P.M., Whitteridge D. The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys. J. Physiol. 1961, 159:203-221.
9. Ehrenstein W.H., Reinhardt-Rutland A.H. A cross-modal aftereffect: auditory displacement following adaptation to visual motion. Percept. Mot. Skills 1996, 82:23-26.
10. Ernst M.O., Bülthoff H.H. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:162-169.
11. Freeman E., Driver J. Direction of visual apparent motion driven solely by timing of a static sound. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1262-1266.
12. Grantham D.W., Hornsby B.W., Erpenbeck E.A. Auditory spatial resolution in horizontal, vertical, and diagonal planes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2003, 114:1009-1022.
13. Hagen M.C., Franzén O., McGlone F., Essick G., Dancer C., Pardo J.V. Tactile motion activates the human middle temporal/V5 (MT/V5) complex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2002, 16:957-964.
14. Hidaka S., Manaka Y., Teramoto W., Sugita Y., Miyauchi R., Gyoba J., Suzuki Y., Iwaya Y. Alternation of sound location induces visual motion perception of a static object. PLoS One 2009, 4:e8188.
15. Kitagawa N., Ichihara S. Hearing visual motion in depth. Nature 2002, 416:172-174.
16. Lewis J.W., Beauchamp M.S., DeYoe E.A. A comparison of visual and auditory motion processing in human cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2000, 10:873-888.
17. Lopez-Moliner J., Soto-Faraco S. Vision affects how fast we hear sounds move. J. Vis. 2007, 7:1-7.
18. Maeda F., Kanai R., Shimojo S. Changing pitch induced visual motion illusion. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:R990-991.
19. Mateeff S., Hohnsbein J., Noack T. Dynamic visual capture: apparent auditory motion induced by a moving visual target. Perception 1985, 14:721-727.
20. Meyer G.F., Wuerger S.M. Cross-modal integration of auditory and visual motion signals. Neuroreport 2001, 12:2557-2560.
21. Pelli D.G. The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 1983, 10:437-442.
22. Radeau M., Bertelson P. The effect of a textured visual field on modality dominance in a ventriloquism situation. Percept. Psychophys. 1976, 20:227-235.
23. Rovamo J., Virsu V. An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Exp. Brain Res. 1979, 37:495-510.
24. Sekuler R., Sekuler A.B., Lau R. Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature 1997, 385:308.
25. Soto-Faraco S., Kingstone A., Spence C. Multisensory contributions to the perception of motion. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:1847-1862.
26. Soto-Faraco S., Spence C., Kingstone A. Cross-modal dynamic capture: congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2004, 30:330-345.
27. Soto-Faraco S., Spence C., Lloyd D., Kingstone A. Moving multisensory research along: Motion perception across sensory modalities. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 13:29-32.
28. Stekelenburg J.J., Vroomen J. Neural correlates of audiovisual motion capture. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 198:383-390.
29. Vroomen J., de Gelder B Visual motion influences the contingent auditory motion aftereffect. Psychol. Sci. 2003, 14:357-361.
30. Watanabe K., Shimojo S. When sound affects vision: effects of auditory grouping on visual motion perception. Psychol. Sci. 2001, 12:109-116.
31. Whitteridge D., Daniel P.M. The representation of the visual field on the calcarine cortex. The Visual System: Neurophysiology and Psychophysics 1961, Springer, Berlin, Göttingen, Heidelberg. R. Jung, H. Kornhuber (Eds.).