Barriers to interorganizational information sharing in e-government: A stakeholder analysis

Information Society

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 315-329

  Fedorowicz, Jane ^a   Gogan, Janis L ^a   Culnan, Mary J ^a  

^a BENTLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data mining; Data warehouse; E government; Interorganizational information sharing; Privacy; Stakeholder theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957771511     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2010.511556     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Argandona, A. 1998. The stakeholder theory and the common good. Journal of Business Ethics 17:1093-1102.
2. Australian Taxation Office, Compliance Program. 2006-2007. http:/ www.ato.gov.au/corporate/content.asp?doc=/content/77362.htm&page=5 (accessed August 28, 2006).
3. Belanger, F., and J. S. Hiller. 2006. A framework for e-government: Privacy implications. Business Process Management Journal 12(1):48-60.
4. BBC. 2008. Revenue tactics 'more effective.' BBC News Channel, April 2. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7324581.stm
5. CA.com. 2008. FTB seeks tax returns from 750,000 non-filers. State of California. http://www.ftb.ca.gov/aboutftb/press/archive/2008/ 08 07.shtml
6. California Franchise Tax Board. 2006. Tax gap plan: A strategic approach to reducing California's tax gap. http://www.ftb.ca.gov/ aboutFTB/TaxGapStratPlan.pdf
7. Carbasho, T. 2004. Data mining helps feds crack down on tax evaders. Pittsburgh Business Times, November 29. www.bizjournals.com/pittsburgh/stories/2004/11/29/focus5.html
8. Carroll, A. 1989. Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati: Southwestern.
9. Cordano, M., I. H. Frieze, and K.M. Ellis. 2004. Entangled affiliations and attitudes: An analysis of the influences on environmental policy stakeholders' behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Ethics 49:27-40.
10. Culnan, M. J., and R. J. Bies. 2003. Consumer privacy: Balancing economic and justice considerations. Journal of Social Issues 59(2):323-342.
11. Culnan, M. J., and C. C. Williams. 2009. How ethics can enhance organizational privacy: Lessons from the Choice Point and TJX data breaches. MIS Quarterly 33(4):673-688.
12. Dabourg, A. J., and J. M. Calton. 2002. Stakeholder learning dialogues: How to preserve ethical responsibility in networks. Journal of Business Ethics 41(1/2):85-98.
13. Dawes, S. S., and O. Eglene. 2004. New models of collaboration for delivering government services: A dynamic model drawn from multi-national research. d.go 2004 Conference. http://dgrc.org/dgo2004/disc/presentations/collaboration/dawes.pdf
14. David, T. M. 2007. The tax non-filer: Public enemy number one? The Practical Tax Lawyer 21(3):7-14.
15. Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman, and L. Donaldson. 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review 22(1):20-47.
16. Donaldson, T. 1999. Making stakeholder theory whole. Academy of Management Review 24(2):237-41.
17. Donaldson, T., and L. Preston. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1):65-91.
18. Erard, B., and C. C. Ho. 2001. Searching for ghosts: Who are the nonfilers and how much tax do they owe? Journal of Public Economics 81(1):25-50.
19. Esteves, J., and R. C. Joseph. 2008. A comprehensive framework for the assessment of eGovernment projects. Government Information Quarterly 25(1):118-32.
20. Evan, W. M., and R. E. Freeman. 1988. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In Ethical theory and business, ed. T. L. Beauchamp and N. E. Bowie, 97-106. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Federal Trade Commission. 1998. Privacy online:Areport to Congress. June. http://www.ftc.gov/reports/privacy3/toc.shtm
22. Fedorowicz, J., J. L. Gogan, and C. B. Williams. 2006. The e-government collaboration challenge: Lessons from five case studies. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government. www.businessofgovernment.org/main/publications/grant reports/details/index.asp?GID=282
23. Fedorowicz, J., U. J. Gelinas, J. L. Gogan, and C. B Williams. 2008. Strategic alignment of participant motivations in e-government collaborations: The Internet Payment Platform pilot. Government Information Quarterly 26(1):453-470.
24. Flak, L.S., S. Nordheim, and B. E. Munkvold. 2008. Analyzing stakeholder diversity in G2G efforts: Combining descriptive stakeholder theory and dialectic process theory. E-Service Journal 6(2): 3-23.
25. Flak, L. S., and J. Rose. 2005. Stakeholder governance: Adapting stakeholder theory to e-government. Communications of the AIS 16:642-664.
26. Fountain, J. E. 2001. Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
27. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
28. Freeman, R. E. 1999. Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review 24(2):233-236.
29. Gleckman, H. 2006. If you're cheating on your taxes. Business Week, April 17, p. 34.
30. Greenaway, K. E., and Y. E. Chan. 2005. Theoretical explanations for firms' information privacy behaviors. Journal of the AIS 6(6):171-198.
31. Hosmer, L. T., and C. K. Kiewitz. 2005. Organizational justice: A behavioral science concept with critical implications for business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 15(1):67-91.
32. Husted, B. W. 1998. Organizational justice and the management of stakeholder relations. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 643-51.
33. Introna, L., and A. Pouloudi. 1999. Privacy in the information age: Stakeholders, interests, and values. Journal of Business Ethics 22(1):27-39.
34. Jones, T. M., and A. C. Wicks. 1999. Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review 24(2):206-221.
35. Kaler, J. 2003. Differentiating stakeholder theories. Journal of Business Ethics 69:249-68.
36. Kaler, J. 2006. Evaluating stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics 69:249-68.
37. Kusserow, R. P. 1984. The Government needs computer matching to root out waste and fraud. Communications of the ACM 27(6):542-5.
38. Lai, E. 2008. Been audited lately? Blame the IRS' massive, super-fast data warehouse. Computerworld, March 22. http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9070858
39. Laplume, A. O., K. Sonpar, and R. A. Litz. 2008. Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management 34:1152-89.
40. Leam, S. 2004. Multnonah County, Ore., improves collection record on income tax. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, October 24, p. 1.
41. Mason, R. O. 1986. Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Quarterly 10(1):4-12.
42. McCrohan, K. F. 1989. Information technology, privacy, and the public good. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 8(1):265-78.
43. Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle, and D. J. Wood. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4):853-88.
44. Nichols, R. 2010. Car-mounted cameras to target delinquent taxpayers in Suffolk, Va. Government Technology, April 8. http://www.govtech.com/gt/articles/752359?elq=c87dbeb8fll04065888d353f8 f93dcdl
45. Office of the Legislative Auditor. 2006. Tax compliance. Program Evaluation Division, State of Minnesota. March. http://www.auditor.leg.state.mn.us/Ped/2006/taxcompsum.htm
46. Payne, S. L., and J. M. Calton. 2004. Exploring research potentials and applications for multi-stakeholder learning dialogues. Journal of Business Ethics 55(10):71-8.
47. Phillips, R. A. 1997. Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly 7(1):51-66.
48. Phillips, R. A.,R. E. Freeman, and A. C.Wicks. 2003. What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly 13(4):479-502.
49. Privacy International. 2004. Global Human Rights study warns of endemic privacy threats. November 18. http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd%5B347%5D=x-347-183139
50. Regan, P. M. 1995. Legislating privacy: Technology, social values, and public policy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
51. Russell, R. 2006. GAO: Reforming the tax system will close tax gap. WebCPA, September 4. http://www.webcpa.com/article.cfm?articleid=21721&pg=tax&print=yes
52. Scholl, H. J. 2001. Applying stakeholder theory to e-government. IFIP Conference Proceedings 202:735-748.
53. Schwarzkopf, D. L. 2006. Stakeholder perspectives and business risk perception. Journal of Business Ethics 64:327-342.
54. Scott, M.,W. Golden, and M. Hughes. 2004. Implementation strategies for e-government: A stakeholder analysis approach. Proceedings ofthe Twelfth European Conference on Information Systems, Turku, Finland.
55. Sisodia, R., J. Sheth, and D. B. Wolfe. 2007. Firms of endearment: How world-class companies profit from passion and purpose. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
56. Smith, H. J. 2003. Privacy policies and practices: Inside the organizational maze. Communications of the ACM 3 (2):105-122.
57. Smith, H. J. 2004. But what's the 'right thing'?: Ethics and information systems in the corporate domain. MIS Quarterly Executive 3(2):105-115.
58. Smith, H. J., and J. Hasnas. 1999. Ethics and information systems: The corporate domain. MIS Quarterly 23(1):109-127.
59. Solove, D. J. 2008. Understanding privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
61. State Revenue Office. 2007. Compliance program for 2007-2008. http://www.sro.vic.gov.au/sro/srowebsite.nsf/AboutUS compliance.htm
62. Swire, P. P., and S. Bermann. 2007. Information privacy: Official reference for the certified information privacy professional. York, ME: International Association for Privacy Professionals.
63. Tan, C.W., and S. L. Pan. 2003. Managing e-transformation in the public sector: An e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS). European Journal on Information Systems 12(4):269.
64. Tan, C. W., S. L. Pan, and E. T. K. Lim. 2005. Managing stakeholder interests in e-government implementation: Lessons learned from a Singapore e-government project. Journal of Global Information Management 13(1):31-53.
65. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. 2003. OMB guidance for implementing the Privacy Provisions of the E-Government Act of 2002. Memorandum M-03-22, September 26. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/m03-22.html.
66. Van Buren, H. J. 2001. If fairness is the problem, is consent the solution? Integrating ISCT and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 11(3):481-499.
67. Wilkinson, K. 2010. States turn to technology to dig up unpaid taxes. Government Technology,March 22. http://www.govtech.com/gt/articles/749686?elq=5f9e5827c8d944b7b7ba496e6ffad50f
68. Xu, H., T. Dinev, H. J. Smith, and P. Hart. 2008. Examining the formation of individual's privacy concerns: Toward an integrative view. ICIS 2008 Proceedings. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/6.
69. Yaniv, G. 2003. Auditing ghosts by prosperity signals. Economics Bulletin 8(9):1-10.
70. Zahn, M. 1995. Electronic footprints. Milwaukee Sentinel, January 16. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi qn4208/is 19950116/ain10181269/print
71. Zhang, J., S. S. Dawes, and J. Sarkis. 2005. Exploring stakeholders' expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18(5):548-567.