Organizational justice and the management of stakeholder relations

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 643-651

  Husted, Bryan W ^a,b,c  

^a Mgmt Dept of the Inst Tecn   (Mexico)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c IE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032507315     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adams, J. S.: 1965, 'Inequity in Social Exchange', in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 2 (Academic Press, New York), pp. 267-299.
2. Bies, R. J., D. L. Shapiro and L. L. Cummings: 1988, 'Voice and Justification: Their Influence on Procedural Fairness Judgments', Academy of Management Journal 31, 676-685.
3. Boulding, K.: 1978, 'The Legitimacy of the Business Institution', in E. M. Epstein and D. Votaw (eds.), Rationality, Legitimacy, and Responsibility: Search for New Directions in Business and Society (Goodyear Publishing Co., Santa Monica, CA), pp. 83-97.
4. Center for Business Ethics: 1986, 'Are Corporations Institutionalizing Ethics?', Journal of Business Ethics 5, 85-91.
5. Dierkes, M.: 1985, 'Corporate Social Reporting and Auditing: Theory and Practice', in K. J. Hopt and G. Teubner (eds.), Corporate Governance and Directors' Liabilities: Legal, Economic and Sociological Analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).
6. Dowling, J. and J. Pfeffer: 1975, 'Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior', Pacific Sociological Review 18, 122-136.
7. Edelman, L. B.: 1990, 'Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace', American Journal of Sociology 95, 1401-1440.
8. Epstein, E. M.: 1987. 'The Corporate Social Policy Process: Beyond Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Social Responsiveness', California Management Review 29, 99-114.
9. Epstein, E. M. and D. Votaw (eds.): 1978, Rationality, Legitimacy, and Responsibility: Search for New Directions in Business and Society (Goodyear Publishing Co., Santa Monica, CA).
10. Ewing, D. A.: 1989, Justice on the Job: Resolving Grievances in the Nonunion Workplace (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).
11. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. (Pitman, Boston, MA).
12. Folger, R.: 1977, 'Distributive and Procedural Justice: Combined Impact of "Voice" and Improvement on Experienced Inequity', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35, 108-119.
13. Folger, R. and J. Greenberg: 1985, 'Procedural Justice: An Interpretive Analysis of Personnel Systems', in K. Rowland and G. Ferris (eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol. 3, (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 141-183.
14. Folger, R. and M. A. Konovsky: 1989, 'Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions', Academy of Management Journal 32, 115-130.
15. Folger, R., M. A. Konovsky and R. Cropanzano: 1992, 'A Due Process Metaphor for Performance Appraisal', in Barry M. Staw and Larry L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 14 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 129-177.
16. Folger, R., D. Rosenfield, R. Hays and R. Grove: 1978: 'Justice vs. Justification Effects on Productivity: Reconciling Equity and Dissonance Findings', Organzational Behavior and Human Performance 22, 465-473.
17. Goodman, P. S. and A. Friedman: 1971, 'An Examination of Adams' Theory of Inequity', Administrative Science Quarterly 16, 271-288.
18. Greenberg, J.: 1990, 'Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow', Journal of Management 16, 399-432.
19. Greenberg, J. and R. J. Bies: 1992, 'Establishing the Role of Empirical Studies of Organizational Justice in Philosophical Inquiries into Business Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 11, 433-444.
20. Habermas, J.: 1973, Legitimation Crisis (Beacon Press, Boston, MA).
21. Jones, T. M.: 1979, 'Corporate Governance: Who Controls the Large Corporation?', Hastings Law Journal 30, 1261-1286.
22. Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1984, 'Choice, Values, and Frames', American Psychologist 39, 341-350.
23. Kosnick, R. D.: 1987, 'Greenmail: A Study of Board Performance in Corporate Governance', Administrative Science Quarterly 32, 163-185.
24. Leventhal, G. S.: 1980, 'What Should be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships', in K. Gergen, M. Greenberg and R. Willis (eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 27-55.
25. Leventhal, G. S., J. Karuza and W. R. Fry: 1980, 'Beyond Fairness: A Theory of Allocation Preferences', in G. Mikula (ed.), Justice and Social Interaction (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 167-218.
26. Lind, E. A. and T. R. Tyler: 1988, The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 27-55.
27. Nash, L. L.: 1988, 'The Norton Company's Ethics Program', in James Keogh (ed.), Corporate Ethics: A Prime Business Asset (The Business Roundtable, New York), pp. 115-130.
28. Silk, L. and D. Vogel: 1976, Ethics and Profits: The Crisis of Confidence in American Business (Simon and Schuster, New York).
29. Stone C. D.: 1975, Where the Law Ends (Harper & Row, New York).
30. Stone C. D.: 1985, 'Public Interest Representation: Economic and Social Policy Inside the Enterprise', in K. J. Hopt and G. Teubner (eds.), Corporate Governance and Directors' Liabilities: Legal, Economic and Sociological Analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin), pp. 122-146.
31. Thibaut, J. W. and L. Walker: 1975, Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis (Erlbaum/Halstead, New York).
32. Thibaut, J. W. and L. Walker: 1978, 'A Theory of Procedure', California Law Review 66, 541-566.
33. U.S. Department of Commerce: 1979, Corporate Social Reporting in the United States and Western Europe: Report of the Task Force on Social Performance (U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC).
34. Williams, E. E. and M. C. Chapman Findlay, III: 1984, 'Corporate Governance: A Problem of Hierarchies and Self Interest', American Journal of Economics and Sociology 43, 19-36.