Stakeholder perspectives and business risk perception

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 327-342

  Schwarzkopf, David L ^a  

^a BENTLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Business communication; Multi stakeholder dialogues; Stakeholder analysis; Stakeholder network; Stakeholder theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644979013     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-0002-9     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Atman, C. J., A. Bostroni, B. Fischhoff and M. G. Morgan: 1994, 'Designing Risk Communications: Completing and Correcting Mental Models of Hazardous Processes, Part I', Risk Analysis 14(5), 779-788.
2. Buysse, K. and A. Verbeke: 2003, 'Proactive Environmental Strategies: A Stakeholder Management Perspective', Strategic Management Journal 24(5), 453-470.
3. COSO [Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission]: 2004, Enterprise Risk Management-Integrated Framework (COSO, Jersey City, NJ).
4. Daboub, A. J. and J. M. Gallon: 2002, 'Stakeholder Learning Dialogues: How to Preserve Ethical Responsibility in Networks', Journal of Business Ethics 41(1/2), 85-98.
5. Das, T. K. and B.-S. Teng: 2004, 'The Risk-based View of Trust: A Conceptual Framework', Journal of Business and Psychology 19(1), 85-116.
6. Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, 'The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications', Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65-91.
7. Freeman, R. E.: 1994, 'A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation', in T. L. Beauchamp and N. E. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 66-76.
8. Frooman, J.: 1999, 'Stakeholder Influence Strategies', Academy oj Management Review 24(2), 191-205.
9. "Have fat cats had their day?": 2003, The Economist (24 May), pp. 63-64.
10. Jones, T. M. and A. C. Wicks: 1999, 'Convergent Stakeholder Theory', Academy of Management Review 24(2), 206-221.
11. Karger, C. and P. M. Wiedemann: 1998, 'Kognitive und Affektive Determinanten der Intuitiven Bewertung von Umweltrisiken' ['Cognitive and Affective Determinants of the Intuitive Evaluation of Environmental Risks']. Working paper.
12. Koonce, L., M. L. McAnally and M. Mercer: 2005, 'How Do Investors Judge the Risk of Financial Items?', The Accounting Review 80(1), 221-241.
13. MacGregor, D. G., P. Slovic, M. Berry and H. R. Evensky: 1999, 'Perception of Financial Risk: A Survey Study of Advisors and Planners', Journal of Financial Planning 12(8), 68-86.
14. Nunnally, J. C.: 1978, Psychometric Theory 2(McGraw-Hill, New York, NY).
15. Payne, S. L. and J. M. Calton: 2004, 'Exploring Research Potentials and Applications for Multi-stakeholder Learning Dialogues', Journal of Business Ethics 55(1), 71-78.
16. Rohnnann, B.: 1999, 'Risk Perception Research: Review and Documentation', rev. ed. Arbeiten zur Risiko-Kommunikation, v. 69, (Foschungszentrum Jülich, Programmgruppe Mensch, Umwell, Technik [MUT], Jülich, Germany).
17. Schütz, H. and P. M. Wiedemann: 2003, 'Risikowahrnehmung in der Gesellschaft', Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 46(7), 539-555.
18. Schütz, H., P. M. Wiedemann, and P. C. R. Gray: 2000, 'Risk Perception Beyond the Psychometric Paradigm'. Arbeiten zur Risiko-Kommunikation, v. 78, (Forschungszentrum Jülich, Programmgruppe Mensch, Umwelt, Technik [MUT], Jülich, Germany).
19. Shapira, Z.: 1995, Risk Taking: A Managerial Perspective (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY).
20. Shepard, J. M., M. Betz and L. O'Connell: 1997, 'The Proactive Corporation: Its Nature and Causes', Journal of Business Ethics 16(10), 1001-1010.
21. Sjöberg, L.: 1999, 'The Psychometric Paradigm Revisited', Invited lecture given to the Royal Statistical Society Conference, University of Warwick.
22. Sjöberg, L.: 2000, 'Factors in Risk Perception', Risk Analysis 20(1), 1-11.
23. Sjöberg, L.: 2002, "Are Received Risk Perception Models Alive and Well?', Risk Analysis 22(4), 665-669.
24. Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff and S. Lichtenstein: 1985, 'Characterizing Perceived Risk', in R. W. Kates, C. Hohenemser and J. K. Kasperson (eds.). Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology (Westview Press, Boulder, CO), pp. 91-125.
25. Wiedemann, P. M. and I. Balderjahn: 1999, 'Risikobewertungen im Kognitiven Kontext' ['Risk Assessment in the Cognitive Context'], Arbeiten zur Risiko-Kommunikation, v. 73, (Foschungszentrum Jülich, Programmgruppe Mensch, Umwelt, Technik [MUT], Jülich, Germany).
26. Wiedemann, P. M. and R. M. Kresser: 1997, 'Intuitive Risikobewertung - Strategien der Bewertung von Umweltrisiken' ['Intuitive Risk Assessment - Assessment Strategies for Environmental Risks'], Arbeiten zur Risiko-Kommunikation, v. 62, (Foschungszentrum Jülich, Programmgruppe Mensch, Umwelt, Technik [MUT], Jülich, Germany).