Not all visual memories are created equal

Visual Cognition

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 201-228

  Williams, Carrick C ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Visual memory; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LONG TERM MEMORY; MENTAL TASK; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 77449130472     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280802664482     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Beck, M. R., Peterson, M. S., Boot, W. R., Vomela, M., & Kramer, A. K. (2006). Explicit memory for rejected distractors during visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 150-174.
2. Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2005). Incidental memory for objects in scenes. Visual Cognition, 12, 1017-1040.
3. Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827-1837.
4. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2003a). Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 58-71.
5. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2003b). Global transsaccadic change blindness during scene perception. Psychological Science, 14, 493-497.
6. Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 787-795.
7. Hollingworth, A. (2003). Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 388-403.
8. Hollingworth, A. (2004). Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: The roles of short- and long-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 519-537.
9. Hollingworth, A. (2005). The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 396-411.
10. Hollingworth, A. (2007). Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 3-47.
11. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113-136.
12. Hollingworth, A., Williams, C. C., & Henderson, J. M. (2001). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 761-768.
13. Irwin, D. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2002). Eye movements and scene perception: Memory for things observed. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 882-895.
14. Janzen, G., & van Turennout, M. (2004). Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 673-677.
15. Loftus, G. R. (1972). Eye fixations and recognition memory for pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3,525-551.
16. Melcher, D. (2001). Persistence of visual memory for scenes: A medium-term memory may help us keep track of objects during visual tasks. Nature, 412, 401.
17. Melcher, D. (2006). Accumulation and persistence of memory for natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 6, 8-17.
18. Mitroff, S. R., Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (2004). Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 1268-1281.
19. Nickerson, R. S. (1968). A note on long-term recognition memory for pictorial material. Psychonomic Science, 11, 58.
20. O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461-488.
21. Rensink, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17-42.
22. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (2000). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across brief interruptions. Visual Cognition, 7, 127-145.
23. Simons, D. J., Chabris, C. F., Schnur, T., & Levin, D. T. (2002). Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 78-97.
24. Standing, L. (1973). Learning 10,000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 207-222.
25. Standing, L., Conezio, J., & Haber, R. N. (1970). Perception and memory for pictures: Single- trial learning of 2,500 visual stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 19, 73-74.
26. Tatler, B. W., Gilchrist, I. D., & Land, M. F. (2005). Visual memory for objects in natural scenes: From fixations to object files. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 931-960.
27. Tatler, B. W., Gilchrist, I. D., & Rusted, J. (2003). The time course of abstract visual representations. Perception, 32, 579-592.
28. Vickery, T. J., King, L. W., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Setting up the target template in visual search. Journal of Vision, 5, 81-92. doi: 10.1167/5.1.8. Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/5/1/8/.
29. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
30. Williams, C. C., Henderson, J. M., & Zacks, R. T. (2005). Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 816-827.
31. Williams, C. C., Zacks, R. T., & Henderson, J. M. (in press). Age differences in what is viewed and remembered complex conjunction search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.