Effects of changes in blood pressure and airway pressures on parameters of fluid responsiveness

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 322-327

  Sakka, Samir G ^a   Becher, Lutz ^b   Kozieras, Jan ^c   Van Hout, Nicole ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

^b Central Clinic   (Germany)

^c FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac surgery; Haemodynamic monitoring; Stroke volume variation; Systolic pressure variation; Transpulmonary thermodilution technique

Indexed keywords

NORADRENALIN; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENT;

AIRWAY PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD PRESSURE REGULATION; CARDIOPULMONARY HEMODYNAMICS; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; FLUID BALANCE; HEART INDEX; HEART LEFT ATRIUM PRESSURE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; PATIENT MONITORING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; THERMODILUTION; TIDAL VOLUME; ADULT; AGED; AIRWAY RESISTANCE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SYSTOLE;

ADULT; AGED; AIRWAY RESISTANCE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; NOREPINEPHRINE; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; STROKE VOLUME; SYSTOLE; THERMODILUTION; TIDAL VOLUME; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS;

EID: 68849098620     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32831ac31b     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121:2000-2008.
2. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:64-68.
3. Reuter DA, Goepfert MS, Goresch T, et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94:318-323.
4. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, et al. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28:392-398.
5. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92:984-989.
6. Neumann P. Extravascular lung water and intrathoracic blood volume: double versus single indicator dilution technique. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25:216-219.
7. Sakka SG, Ruhl CC, Pfeiffer UJ, et al. Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26:180-187.
8. Mitchell JP, Schuller D, Calandrino FS, Schuster DP. Improved outcome based on luid management in critically ill patients requiring pulmonary artery catheterization. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 145:990-998.
9. Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, et al. Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest 2003; 124:1900-1908.
10. Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Zeravik J, Pfeiffer UJ. Intrathoracic blood volume accurately relects circulatory volume status in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 1992; 18:142-147.
11. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:746-755.
12. Sakka SG, Bredle DL, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A. Comparison between intrathoracic blood volume and cardiac filling pressures in the early phase of hemodynamic instability of patients with sepsis or septic shock. J Crit Care 1999; 14:78-83.
13. Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Beale R, Pfeiffer UJ. Central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, intrathoracic blood volume, and right ventricular end-diastolic volume as indicators of cardiac preload. J Crit Care 1996; 11 :180-188.
14. Buhre W, Weyland A, Schorn B, et al. Changes in central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure do not indicate changes in right and left heart volume in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1999; 16:11-17.
15. Godje O, Peyerl M, Seebauer T, et al. Central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and intrathoracic blood volumes as preload indicators in cardiac surgery patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998; 13:533-539.
16. Nouira S, Elatrous S, Dimassi S, et al. Effects of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:2339-2343.
17. Kubitz JC, Annecke T, Forkl S, et al. Validation of pulse contour derived stroke volume variation during modifications of cardiac afterload. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98:591-597.
18. Echt M, Duweling J, Gauer OH, Lange L. Effective compliance of the total vascular bed and the intrathoracic compartment derived from changes in central venous pressure induced by volume changes in man. Circ Res 1974; 40:61-68.
19. Szold A, Pizov R, Segal E, Perel A. The effect of tidal volume and intravascular volume state on systolic pressure variation in ventilated dogs. Intensive Care Med 1989; 15:368-371.
20. Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS, et al. Inluence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:476-480.
21. Charron C, Fessenmeyer C, Cosson C, et al. The inluence of tidal volume on the dynamic variables of luid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 2006; 102:1511-1517.
22. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict luid responsiveness: inluence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31 :517-523.