Preoperative and perioperative factors effect on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgical outcomes

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 20, 2010, Pages 1867-1871

  Sanders, James O ^a   Carreon, Leah Y ^b   Sucato, Daniel J ^c   Sturm, Peter F ^d   Diab, Mohammad ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^c TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^d SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

Author keywords

adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; functional outcomes; surgery

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MULTICENTER STUDY; PAIN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CONCEPT; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STUDENT T TEST; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL PATIENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SELF CONCEPT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77957357059     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181efa6f5     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Glattes RC, Burton DC, Lai SM, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22r patient questionnaire compared with the Child Health Questionnaire-CF87 patient questionnaire for adolescent spinal deformity. Spine 2007;32:1778-84.
2. Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC, et al. Refinement of the SRS-22 Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire Function domain. Spine 2006;31: 593-7.
3. Asher M, Min LS, Burton D, et al. Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 2003;28:74-8.
4. Asher MA, Min LS, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine 2000;25: 2381-6.
5. Merola AA, Haher TR, Brkaric M, et al. A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome instrument. Spine 2002;27:2046-51.
6. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine 1999;24:1435-40.
7. White SF, Asher MA, Lai SM, et al. Patients' perceptions of overall function, pain, and appearance after primary posterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:1693-9.
8. Sweet FA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications of single solid rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26:1956-65.
9. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. Spine deformity correlates better than trunk deformity with idiopathic scoliosis patients' quality of life questionnaire responses. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002;91:462-4.
10. Parent EC, Hill D, Mahood J, et al. Associations between quality-of-life and internal or external spinal deformity measurements in adolescent with idio-pathic scoliosis (AIS). Stud Health Technol Inform 2006;123:357-63.
11. Weigert KP, Nygaard LM, Christensen FB, et al. Outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after brace treatment and surgery assessed by means of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument 24. Eur Spine J 2006;15:1108-17.
12. Parent EC, Hill D, Moreau M, et al. Score distribution of the Scoliosis Quality of Life Index questionnaire in different subgroups of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2007;32:1767-77.
13. Newton PO, Upasani VV, Lhamby J, et al. Surgical treatment of main thoracic scoliosis with thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation: a five-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:2077-89.
14. Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, et al. Studies in the modified Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine 2003;28:2164-9.
15. Bridwell KH, Cats-Baril W, Harrast J, et al. The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Spine 2005;30:455-61.
16. Glassman SD, Schwab F, Bridwell KH, et al. Do 1-year outcomes predict 2-year outcomes for adult deformity surgery? Spine J 2009;9:317-22.
17. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Berven S, et al. Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis. Neurosurgery 2009;65:86-93.
18. Beausejour M, Joncas J, Goulet L, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted French Canadian version of Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22) in Quebec. Spine 2009;34:623-8.
19. Niemeyer T, Schubert C, Halm HF, et al. Validity and reliability of an adapted German version of scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire. Spine 2009;34:818-21.
20. Hashimoto H, Sase T, Arai Y, et al. Validation of a Japanese version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire among idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan. Spine 2007;32:E141-6.
21. Zhao L, Zhang Y, Sun X, et al. The Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire adapted for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients in China: reliability and validity analysis. J Child Orthop 2007;1:351-5.
22. Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine 2005; 30:2464-8.
23. Climent JM, Bago J, Ey A, et al. Validity of the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) patient questionnaire. Spine 2005; 30:705-9.
24. Floman Y, Penny JN, Micheli LJ, et al. Osteotomy of the fusion mass in scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:1307-16.
25. D'Andrea LP, Betz RR, Lenke LG, et al. Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 2002;25: 1795-802.
26. Lai SM, Asher M, Burton D. Estimating SRS-22 quality of life measures with SF-36: application in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:473-8.
27. Sanders JO, Harrast JJ, Kuklo TR, et al. The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2007;32:2719-22.
28. Bridwell KH, Berven S, Glassman S, et al. Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery? Spine 2007;32:2220-5.
29. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, et al. Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:682-8.