Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry following penetrating keratoplasty

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 489-493

  Kandarakis, Artemios ^a   Soumplis, Vasileios ^a   Pitsas, Christos ^a   Kandarakis, Stylianos ^b   Halikias, Jiannis ^c   Karagiannis, Dimitrios ^a  

^a Athens Eye Hospital   (Greece)

^b MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Dynamic contour tonometry; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Intraocular pressure; Penetrating keratoplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; GOLDMAN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOMETRY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SUTURE REMOVAL; TONOMETRY;

EID: 77957346762     PISSN: 00084182     EISSN: 17153360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3129/i10-035     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Pandav SS, Sharma A, Gupta A, Sharma SK, Gupta A, Patnaik B. Reliability of proton and goldmann applanation tonometers in normal and postkeratoplasty eyes. Ophthalmology 2002;109:979-84. (Pubitemid 34465235)
2. Irvine AR, Kaufman HE. Intraocular pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1969;68:835-44.
3. West CE, Capella JA, Kaufman HE. Measurement of intraocular pressure with a pneumatic applanation tonometer. Am J Ophthalmol 1972;74:505-9.
4. Rootman DS, Insler MS, Thompson HW, Parelman J, Poland D, Unterman SR. Accuracy and precision of the Tono-Pen in measuring intraocular pressure after keratoplasty and epikeratophakia and in scarred corneas. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:1697-700. (Pubitemid 19000132)
5. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1975;53:34-43.
6. Mark HH. Corneal curvature in applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1973;76:223-4.
7. Holladay JT, Allison ME, Prager TC. Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with regular corneal astigmatism. Am J Ophthalmol 1983;96:90-3.
8. Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC. Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 2005;14:344-50. (Pubitemid 41383326)
9. Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurementcomparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 2006;15:2-6. (Pubitemid 43068411)
10. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:746-51. (Pubitemid 38501466)
11. Ozbek Z, Cohen EJ, Hammersmith KM, Rapuano CJ. Dynamic contour tonometry: a new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas. Cornea 2006;25:890-4. (Pubitemid 44763846)
12. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1572-5. (Pubitemid 41729900)
13. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E, et al. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 2006;113:2156-62. (Pubitemid 44838915)
14. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:3118-21. (Pubitemid 39121844)
15. Ku JY, Danesh-Meyer HV, Craig JP, Gamble GD, McGhee CN. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Eye 2006;20:191-8.
16. Doyle A, Lachkar Y. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma 2005;14:288-92. (Pubitemid 41023013)
17. Punjabi OS, Kniestedt C, Stamper RL, Lin SC. Dynamic contour tonometry: principle and use. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006;34:837-40. (Pubitemid 44869687)
18. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
19. Foulks GN. Glaucoma associated with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1987;94:871-4.
20. Karesh JW, Nirankari VS. Factors associated with glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1983;96:160-4.
21. Wilson SE, Kaufman HE. Graft failure after penetrating. Surv Ophthalmol 1990;34:325-56.
22. Chien AM, Schmidt CM, Cohen EJ, et al. Glaucoma in the immediate postoperative period after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;115:711-4.
23. Goldberg DB, Schanzlin DJ, Brown SI. Incidence of increased intraocular pressure after keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1981;92:372-7.
24. Kirkness CM, Moshegov C. Post-keratoplasty glaucoma. Eye 1988;2:19-26.
25. Simmons RB, Stern RA, Teekhasaenee C, Kenyon KR. Elevated intraocular pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1989;87:79-91.
26. Zimmerman TJ, Krupin T, Grodzki W, Waltman SR. The effect of suture depth on outflow facility in penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 1978;96:505-6. (Pubitemid 8305145)
27. Lass JH, Pavan-Langston D. Timolol therapy in secondary angle-closure glaucoma post penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1979;86:51-9. (Pubitemid 9171536)
28. Jain AK, Saini JS, Gupta R. Tonometry in normal and scarred corneas, and in postkeratoplasty eyes: a comparative study of the Goldmann, the ProTon and the Schiotz tonometers. Indian J Ophthalmol 2000;48:25-32.
29. Rao VJ, Gnanaraj L, Mitchell KW, Figueiredo FC. Clinical comparison of ocular blood flow tonometer, Tonopen, and Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in postkeratoplasty eyes. Cornea 2001;20:834-8.
30. Geyer O, Mayron Y, Loewenstein A, Neudorfer M, Rothkoff L, Lazar M. Tono-Pen tonometry in normal and in post-keratoplasty eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 1992;76:538-40.
31. Ismail AR, Lamont M, Perera S, et al. Comparison of IOP measurement using GAT and DCT in patients with penetrating keratoplasties. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:980-1. (Pubitemid 47013120)
32. Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:215-21.
33. Moses RA. Repeated applanation tonometry. Ophthalmologica 1961;142:663-8.
34. Wilke K. Effects of repeated tonometry: genuine and sham measurements. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1972;50:574-82.
35. Denis P, Nordmann JP, Bertin V, Gayraud JM, Laroche L, Saraux H. Evaluation of the Tono-Pen 2 and the X-Pert noncontact tonometers in cataract surgery. Ophthalmologica 1993;207:155-61. (Pubitemid 24001985)
36. Armstrong TA. Evaluation of the Tono-Pen and the Pulsair tonometers. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;109:716-20.
37. Kao SF, Lichter PR, Bergstrom TJ, Rowe S, Musch DC. Clinical comparison of the Oculab Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Ophthalmology 1987;94:1541-4. (Pubitemid 18006879)
38. Kass MA. Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. Ophthalmology 1996;103:183-5.