A multilevel model of minority opinion expression and team decision-making effectiveness

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 95, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 824-833

  Park, Guihyun ^a   DeShon, Richard P ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Goal orientation; Minority influence; Team effectiveness; Teams

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; MALE; MINORITY GROUP; MOTIVATION; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SATISFACTION; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GOALS; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; MINORITY GROUPS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957329133     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019939     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abelson R.P. A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin 1985, 97:129-133.
2. Baron R.S., Kerr N.L. Group process, group decision, group action 2003, Open University Press, Buckingham, PA.
3. Bell S.T. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 2007, 92:595-615.
4. Burden of Enron's collapse on Skilling as sentencing approaches. USA Today 2006, October 22, Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2006-10-22-skilling-sentence_x.htm.
5. Campbell J., Stasser G. The influence of time and task demonstrability on decision-making in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research 2006, 37:271-294.
6. Cannon-Bowers J.A., Tannenbaum S.I., Salas E., Volpe C.E. Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations 1995, 333-381. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. R.A. Guzzo, E. Salas (Eds.).
7. Chan D. Functional relations among cohesions in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology 1998, 83:234-246.
8. Cook J.D., Hepworth S.J., Wall T.D., Warr P.B. The experience of work: A compendium of 249 measures and their use 1981, Academic Press, London, England.
9. Cortina J.M., Landis R.S. When small effect sizes tell a big story, and when large effect sizes don't. Statistical and methodological myths and urban legend: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences 2008, 287-308. Routledge, New York, NY. C.E. Lance, R.J. Vandenberg (Eds.).
10. De Dreu C.K.W. Minority dissent, attitude change, and group performance. The science of social influence: Advances and future progress 2007, 247-270. Psychology Press, New York, NY. A.R. Pratkanis (Ed.).
11. De Dreu C.K.W., Beersma B. Minority dissent in organizational teams: Implications for group innovation. Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation 2001, 258-283. Blackwell, London, England. C.K.W. De Dreu, N.K. De Vries (Eds.).
12. De Dreu C.K.W., De Vries N.K. Differential processing and attitude change following majority versus minority arguments. British Journal of Social Psychology 1996, 35:77-90.
13. De Dreu C.K.W., West M.A. Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86:1191-1201.
14. DeShon R.P., Kozlowski S.W.J., Schmidt A.M., Milner K.R., Wiechmann D. A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 2004, 89:1035-1056.
15. Drake B.H., Mitchell T.R. The effects of vertical and horizontal power on individual motivation and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal 1977, 20:573-591.
16. Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 1999, 44:350-383.
17. Edmondson A. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science 2002, 13:128-146.
18. Elliot A.J., Mcgregor H.A. A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 80:501-519.
19. Forsyth D.R. Group dynamics 2006, Thomson, Belmont, CA. 4th ed.
20. Hackman J.R. The design of work teams. Handbook of organizational behavior 1988, 315-342. Prentice-Hall, Englewood cliffs, NJ. J. Lorsch (Ed.).
21. Henry R.A., Sniezek J.A. Situational factors affecting judgments of future performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1993, 54:104-132.
22. Hinz V.B. Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 59:705-718.
23. Ilgen D.R., Hollenbeck J.R., Johnson M., Jundt D. Teams in organizations: From I-P-O models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology 2005, 56:517-544.
24. Ilgen D.R., Major D.A., Hollenbeck J.R., Sego D.J. Raising an individual decision-making model to the team level: A new research model and paradigm. Team decision making in organizations 1995, 113-148. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. R. Guzzo, E. Salas (Eds.).
25. Janis I.L. Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes 1982, Houghton Mifflin, New York, NY. 2nd ed.
26. Kerr N.L. Is it what one says or how one says it? Style vs substance from an SDS Perspective. Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation 2001, 201-228. Blackwell, Oxford, England. C.K.W. De Dreu, N.K. De Vries (Eds.).
27. Kerr N.L., Tindale R.S. Small group decision making and performance. Annual Review of Psychology 2004, 55:623-656.
28. Larson J.R., Foster-Fishman P.G., Keys C.B. Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 67:446-461.
29. Lepine J.A. Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: Effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90:1153-1167.
30. Lott A.J., Lott B.E. Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequence variables. Psychological Bulletin 1965, 64:259-309.
31. MacKinnon D.P., Lockwood C.M., Hoffman J.M., West S.G., Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods 2002, 7:83-104.
32. Martin R., Hewstone M. Conformity and independence in groups: Majorities and minorities. Handbook of social psychology: Group processes 2001, 209-234. Blackwell, Malden, MA. M.A. Hogg, R.S. Tindale (Eds.).
33. Miller K.I., Monge P.R. Participation, satisfaction, and productivity: A meta analytic review. Academy of Management Journal 1986, 29:727-753.
34. Morrison E.W., Milliken F.J. Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review 2000, 25:706-725.
35. Moscovici S. Social influence and conformity. The handbook of social psychology 1985, 347-412. Random House, New York, NY. G. Lindzey, E. Aaronson (Eds.).
36. Nemeth C., Chiles C. Modeling courage: The role of dissent in fostering independence. European Journal of Social Psychology 1988, 18:275-280.
37. Nemeth C., Kwan J. Minority influence, divergent thinking, and detection of correct solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1987, 17:788-799.
38. Nemeth C., Staw B.M. The tradeoffs of control and innovation in groups and organizations. Advances in experimental social psychology 1989, 22:175-210. Academic Press, New York, NY. L. Berkowitz (Ed.).
39. Nemeth C., Wachtler J. Creating the perceptions of consistency and confidence: A necessary condition for minority influence. Sociometry 1974, 37:529-540.
40. Papaioannou A., Kouli O. The effect of task structure, perceived motivational climate and goal orientations on students' intrinsic motivation and anxiety. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 1999, 11:51-71.
41. Parker L.E. When to fix it and when to leave: The relationship among perceived control, self-efficacy, dissent and exit. Journal of Applied Psychology 1993, 78:949-959.
42. Rosenthal R., Rubin D.B. r equivalent: A simple effect size indicator. Psychological Methods 2003, 8:492-496.
43. Schulz-Hardt S., Brodbeck F.C., Mojzisch A., Kerschreiter R., Frey D. Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 91:1080-1093.
44. Schweiger D.M., Sandberg W.R., Rechner P.L. Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal 1989, 32:745-772.
45. Schwenk C.R. Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1990, 47:161-176.
46. Stasser G., Titus W. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1985, 48:1467-1478.
47. Stewart G.L. A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management 2006, 52:29-54.
48. Stone-Romero E.F., Rosopa P.J. The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics. Organizational Research Methods 2008, 11:326-352.
49. Ten Velden F.S., Beersma B., De Dreu C.K.W. Majority and minority influence in group negotiation: The moderating influence of social motivation and decision rules. Journal of Applied Psychology 2007, 92:259-268.
50. Van Dyne L., Saavedra R. A naturalistic minority influence experiment: Effects on divergent thinking, conflict and originality in work-groups. British Journal of Social Psychology 1996, 35:151-168.
51. Van Prooijen J.W., Karremans J.C., Van Beest I. Procedural justice and the hedonic principle: How approach versus avoidance motivation influences the psychology of voice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 91:686-697.
52. Zimbardo P., Butler L., Wolfe V. Cooperative college examinations: More gain, less pain when students share information and grades. Journal of Experimental Education 2003, 71:101-126.