PDOCK: A new technique for rapid and accurate docking of peptide ligands to Major Histocompatibility Complexes

Immunome Research

Volumn 6, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2010, Pages

  Khan, Javed Mohammed ^a   Ranganathan, Shoba ^a,b  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 1; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 2; PEPTIDE;

ACCURACY; ALLELE; ANTIGEN BINDING; CONFERENCE PAPER; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PDOCK METHOD; PREDICTION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 77957258599     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17457580     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-7580-6-S1-S2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Quantitative peptide binding motifs for 19 human and mouse MHC class I molecules derived using positional scanning combinatorial peptide libraries. J Sidney E Assarsson C Moore S Ngo C Pinilla A Sette B Peters, Immunome Res 2008 4 2 10.1186/1745-7580-4-2 18221540
2. Modeling the structure of bound peptide ligands to major histocompatibility complex. JC Tong TW Tan S Ranganathan, Protein Sci 2004 13 9 2523 2532 10.1110/ps.04631204 15322290
3. Prediction of HLA-DQ3.2beta ligands: evidence of multiple registers in class II binding peptides. JC Tong GL Zhang TW Tan JT August V Brusic S Ranganathan, Bioinformatics 2006 22 10 1232 1238 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl071 16510499
4. IMGT unique numbering for MHC groove G-DOMAIN and MHC superfamily (MhcSF) G-LIKE-DOMAIN. MP Lefranc E Duprat Q Kaas M Tranne A Thiriot G Lefranc, Dev Comp Immunol 2005 29 11 917 938 10.1016/j.dci.2005.03.003 15936075
5. Modeling the bound conformation of Pemphigus vulgaris-associated peptides to MHC class II DR and DQ alleles. JC Tong J Bramson D Kanduc S Chow AA Sinha S Ranganathan, Immunome Res 2006 2 1 10.1186/1745-7580-2-1 16426456
6. Prediction of desmoglein-3 peptides reveals multiple shared T-cell epitopes in HLA DR4- and DR6-associated Pemphigus vulgaris. JC Tong TW Tan AA Sinha S Ranganathan, BMC Bioinformatics 2006 7 Suppl 5 7 10.1186/1471-2105-7-S5- S7 17254312
7. In silico characterization of immunogenic epitopes presented by HLA-Cw*0401. JC Tong ZH Zhang JT August V Brusic TW Tan S Ranganathan, Immunome Res 2007 3 7 10.1186/1745-7580-3-7 17705876
8. Three-dimensional structure of the human class II histocompatibility antigen HLA-DR1. JH Brown TS Jardetzky JC Gorga LJ Stern RG Urban JL Strominger DC Wiley, Nature 1993 364 6432 33 39 10.1038/364033a0 8316295
9. Crystal structure of the human class II MHC protein HLA-DR1 complexed with an influenza virus peptide. LJ Stern JH Brown TS Jardetzky JC Gorga RG Urban JL Strominger DC Wiley, Nature 1994 368 6468 215 221 10.1038/368215a0 8145819
10. Antigenic peptide binding by class I and class II histocompatibility proteins. LJ Stern DC Wiley, Structure 1994 2 4 245 251 10.1016/S0969-2126(00) 00026-5 8087551
11. Structural Immunoinformatics: Understanding MHC-peptide-TR binding. JM Khan JC Tong S Ranganathan, Bioinformatics for Immunomics Springer, Immunomics Reviews Series, Davies MN, Ranganathan S, Flower DR, 2009 3 77 94 full-text
12. Methods and protocols for prediction of immunogenic epitopes. JC Tong TW Tan S Ranganathan, Brief Bioinform 2007 8 2 96 108 10.1093/bib/bbl038 17077136
13. Immunodominance in major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted T lymphocyte responses. JW Yewdell JR Bennink, Annu Rev Immunol 1999 17 51 88 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.51 10358753
14. Methods for prediction of peptide binding to MHC molecules: a comparative study. K Yu N Petrovsky C Schonbach JY Koh V Brusic, Mol Med 2002 8 3 137 148 12142545
15. Improved prediction of MHC class I and class II epitopes using a novel Gibbs sampling approach. M Nielsen C Lundegaard P Worning CS Hvid K Lamberth S Buus S Brunak O Lund, Bioinformatics 2004 20 9 1388 1397 10.1093/bioinformatics/ bth100 14962912
16. Recognition of mycobacterial epitopes by T cells across mammalian species and use of a program that predicts human HLA-DR binding peptides to predict bovine epitopes. M Vordermeier AO Whelan RG Hewinson, Infect Immun 2003 71 4 1860 1867 10.1128/IAI.71.4.1980-1987.2003 (Pubitemid 36368731)
17. class I T-cell epitope prediction: improvements using a combination of proteasome cleavage, TAP affinity, and MHC binding. IA Doytchinova DR Flower, Mol Immunol 2006 43 13 2037 2044 10.1016/j.molimm.2005.12.013 16524630
18. Large-scale computational identification of HIV T-cell epitopes. C Schonbach Y Kun V Brusic, Immunol Cell Biol 2002 80 3 300 306 10.1046/j.1440-1711.2002.01089.x 12067417
19. A hybrid approach for predicting promiscuous MHC class I restricted T cell epitopes. M Bhasin GP Raghava, J Biosci 2007 32 1 31 42 10.1007/s12038-007-0004-5 17426378
20. Hotspot Hunter: a computational system for large-scale screening and selection of candidate immunological hotspots in pathogen proteomes. GL Zhang AM Khan KN Srinivasan A Heiny K Lee CK Kwoh JT August V Brusic, BMC Bioinformatics 2008 9 Suppl 1 19 10.1186/1471-2105-9-S1-S19 18315850
21. Prediction of class I T-cell epitopes: evidence of presence of immunological hot spots inside antigens. KN Srinivasan GL Zhang AM Khan JT August V Brusic, Bioinformatics 2004 20 Suppl 1 297 302 10.1093/bioinformatics/ bth943 15262812
22. Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides, using SVMHC. P Donnes A Elofsson, BMC Bioinformatics 2002 3 25 10.1186/1471-2105-3-25 12225620
23. Prediction of T-cell epitopes based on least squares support vector machines and amino acid properties. S Li X Yao H Liu J Li B Fan, Anal Chim Acta 2007 584 1 37 42 10.1016/j.aca.2006.11.037 17386582
24. In silico prediction of peptide-MHC binding affinity using SVRMHC. W Liu J Wan X Meng DR Flower T Li, Methods Mol Biol 2007 409 283 291 full-text 18450008
25. Ranking of binding and nonbinding peptides to MHC class I molecules using inverse folding approach: Implications for vaccine design. SP Singh BN Mishra, Bioinformation 2008 3 2 72 82 19238199
26. A critical cross-validation of high throughput structural binding prediction methods for pMHC. B Knapp U Omasits S Frantal W Schreiner, J Comput Aided Mol Des 2009 23 5 301 307 10.1007/s10822-009-9259-2 19194661
27. Recovery of known T-cell epitopes by computational scanning of a viral genome. A Logean D Rognan, J Comput Aided Mol Des 2002 16 4 229 243 10.1023/A:1020244329512 12400854
28. T-cell epitopes of the La/SSB autoantigen: prediction based on the homology modeling of HLA-DQ2/DQ7 with the insulin-B peptide/HLA-DQ8 complex. A Kosmopoulou M Vlassi A Stavrakoudis C Sakarellos M Sakarellos-Daitsiotis, J Comput Chem 2006 27 9 1033 1044 10.1002/jcc.20422 16639700
29. MS-DOCK: accurate multiple conformation generator and rigid docking protocol for multi-step virtual ligand screening. N Sauton D Lagorce BO Villoutreix MA Miteva, BMC Bioinformatics 2008 9 184 10.1186/1471-2105-9-184 18402678
30. The Protein Data Bank. HM Berman J Westbrook Z Feng G Gilliland TN Bhat H Weissig IN Shindyalov PE Bourne, Nucleic Acids Res 2000 28 1 235 242 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 10592235
31. IMGT/3Dstructure-DB and IMGT/StructuralQuery, a database and a tool for immunoglobulin, T cell receptor and MHC structural data. Q Kaas M Ruiz MP Lefranc, Nucleic Acids Res 2004 32 Database issue 208 210 10.1093/nar/gkh042 14681396
32. IMGT/3Dstructure-DB and IMGT/DomainGapAlign: a database and a tool for immunoglobulins or antibodies, T cell receptors, MHC, IgSF and MhcSF. F Ehrenmann Q Kaas MP Lefranc, Nucleic Acids Res 2010 38 Database issue 301 307 10.1093/nar/gkp946 19900967
33. Structural immunoinformatics. S Ranganathan JC Tong TW Tan, Immunoinformatics Springer, Immunomics Reviews Series, Schonbach C, Ranganathan S, Brusic V, 2008 51 61 full-text
34. Ab initio prediction of peptide-MHC binding geometry for diverse class I MHC allotypes. AJ Bordner R Abagyan, Proteins 2006 63 3 512 526 10.1002/prot.20831 16470819
35. Ab initio folding of peptides by the Optimal-Bias Monte Carlo Minimization Procedure. RA Abagyan MM Totrov, J Comput Phys 1999 151 402 421 10.1006/jcph.1999.6233
36. Modeling ligand-receptor interaction for some MHC class II HLA-DR4 peptide mimetic inhibitors using several molecular docking and 3D QSAR techniques. HY Wei KC Tsai TH Lin, J Chem Inf Model 2005 45 5 1343 1351 10.1021/ci050140y 16180911
37. Structural mining: self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential. Z Liu BN Dominy EI Shakhnovich, J Am Chem Soc 2004 126 27 8515 8528 10.1021/ja032018q 15238009
38. Predicting binding affinities of protein ligands from three-dimensional models: application to peptide binding to class I major histocompatibility proteins. D Rognan SL Lauemoller A Holm S Buus V Tschinke, J Med Chem 1999 42 22 4650 4658 10.1021/jm9910775 10579827
39. Flexible docking of peptide ligands to proteins. J Desmet M De Maeyer J Spriet I Lasters, Methods Mol Biol 2000 143 359 376 11084914
40. Free energy mapping of class I MHC molecules and structural determination of bound peptides. U Sezerman S Vajda C DeLisi, Protein Sci 1996 5 7 1272 1281 10.1002/pro.5560050706 8819160
41. Computing the structure of bound peptides. Application to antigen recognition by class I major histocompatibility complex receptors. R Rosenfeld Q Zheng S Vajda C DeLisi, J Mol Biol 1993 234 3 515 521 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1607 8254656
42. Flexible docking of peptides to class I major-histocompatibility-complex receptors. R Rosenfeld Q Zheng S Vajda C DeLisi, Genet Anal 1995 12 1 1 21 7648466
43. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. A Sali TL Blundell, J Mol Biol 1993 234 3 779 815 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 8254673
44. A multi-species comparative structural bioinformatics analysis of inherited mutations in alpha-D-mannosidase reveals strong genotype-phenotype correlation. JM Khan S Ranganathan, BMC Genomics 2009 10 Suppl 3 33 10.1186/1471-2164-10-S3-S33 19958498
45. Energy parameters in polypeptides, 10: Improved geometric parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm, with application to praline-containing peptides. G Nemethy KD Gibson KA Palmer CN Yoon G Paterlini A Zagari S Rumsey HA Scheraga, J Phys Chem 1992 96 15 6472 6484 10.1021/j100194a068
46. Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates. J Fernandez-Recio M Totrov R Abagyan, Protein Sci 2002 11 2 280 291 10.1110/ps.19202 11790838