Are component positioning and prosthesis size associated with hip resurfacing failure?

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Marker, David R ^a   Zywiel, Michael G ^a   Johnson, Aaron J ^a   Seyler, Thorsten M ^b   Mont, Michael A ^a  

^a SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

^b WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; ADOLESCENT; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957202974     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-227     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. HC Amstutz PE Beaule FJ Dorey MJ Le Duff PA Campbell TA Gruen, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004 86-A 28 39 14711942
2. The early results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing - a prospective study at a minimum two-year follow-up. SG Bergeron NM Desy VS Nikolaou K Debiparshad J Antoniou, Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009 67 132 134 19583540
3. Canadian academic experience with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. M O'Neill PE Beaule A Bin Nasser D Garbuz M Lavigne C Duncan PR Kim E Schemitsch, Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009 67 128 131 19583539
4. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. HC Amstutz MJ Le Duff, J Arthroplasty 2008 23 36 43 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.017 18639431
5. Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: important observations from the first ten years. MA Mont TP Schmalzried, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008 90 Suppl 3 3 11 10.2106/JBJS.H.00750 18676930
6. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A Shimmin PE Beaule P Campbell, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008 90 637 654 10.2106/JBJS.G.01012 18310716
7. Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR hip resurfacing implantations. T Siebel S Maubach MM Morlock, Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2006 220 345 353 16669400
8. Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial. BN Stulberg KK Trier M Naughton JD Zadzilka, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008 90 Suppl 3 21 26 10.2106/JBJS.H.00718 18676932
9. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. DR Marker TM Seyler RH Jinnah RE Delanois SD Ulrich MA Mont, J Arthroplasty 2007 22 66 71 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.017 17919597
10. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Technique, fixation, and early results. TP Schmalzried VA Fowble KJ Ure HC Amstutz, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996 329 106 114 10.1097/00003086-199608001-00011 8769328
11. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis. PE Beaule JL Lee MJ Le Duff HC Amstutz E Ebramzadeh, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004 86 2015 2021 15342765
12. Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. R De Haan PA Campbell EP Su KA De Smet, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008 90 1158 1163 10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.19891 18757954
13. The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. DJ Langton SS Jameson TJ Joyce J Webb AV Nargol, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008 90 1143 1151 18757952
14. Importance of head diameter, clearance, and cup wall thickness in elastohydrodynamic lubrication analysis of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prostheses. F Liu Z Jin P Roberts P Grigoris, Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2006 220 695 704 16961189
15. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. IA Radcliffe M Taylor, Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007 22 780 786 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.03.011 17544555 (Pubitemid 47017498)
16. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck. TP Vail RR Glisson DE Dominguez K Kitaoka D Ottaviano, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008 90 1951 1960 10.2106/JBJS.F.00788 18762656
17. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. GE Lewinnek JL Lewis R Tarr CL Compere JR Zimmerman, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978 60 217 220 641088
18. Some anatomical and mechanical considerations relevant to the surface replacement of the femoral head. MA Freeman, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978 19 24 729243
19. The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. AJ Hart S Sabah J Henckel A Lewis J Cobb B Sampson A Mitchell JA Skinner, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009 91 738 744 10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.21682 19483225
20. Learning how to resurface cam-type femoral heads with acceptable accuracy and precision: the role of computed tomography-based navigation. JP Cobb V Kannan W Dandachli F Iranpour KU Brust AJ Hart, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008 90 Suppl 3 57 64 10.2106/JBJS.H.00606 18676938
21. Navigation reduces the learning curve in resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. JP Cobb V Kannan K Brust G Thevendran, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007 463 90 97 17603387
22. Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis. TM Seyler LP Lai DI Sprinkle WG Ward RH Jinnah, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008 90 Suppl 3 71 80 10.2106/JBJS.H.00697 18676940
23. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. MA Mont TM Seyler SD Ulrich PE Beaule HS Boyd MJ Grecula VM Goldberg WR Kennedy DR Marker TP Schmalzried, et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007 465 63 70 17891034
24. Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve. JR Romanowski ML Swank, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008 90 Suppl 3 65 70 10.2106/JBJS.H.00462 18676939
25. Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. AJ Hart P Buddhdev P Winship N Faria JJ Powell JA Skinner, Hip Int 2008 18 212 219 18924077
26. The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements. SL Smith D Dowson AA Goldsmith, Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2001 215 161 170 11382075 (Pubitemid 34459332)