Recreational shellfish harvesting and health risks: A pseudo-panel approach combining revealed and stated preference data with correction for on-site sampling

Ecological Economics

Volumn 69, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2315-2322

  Beaumais, Olivier ^a   Appéré, Gildas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE ROUEN   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ D'ANGERS   (France)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Count data model; Health risks; Recreation on site sampling

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; HARVESTING; HEALTH RISK; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; SAMPLING; SHELLFISH;

EID: 77957003249     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Adamowicz W., Swait J., Boxall P., Louviere J., Williams M. Perceptions Versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1997, 32:52-64.
2. Borghi J. Aggregation rules for cost-benefit analysis: a health economics perspective. Health Economics 2008, 17:863-875.
3. Cameron T.A. Combining contingent valuation and travel cost data for the valuation of nonmarket goods. Land Economics 1992, 68:302-317.
4. Cunha-e-Sá M.A., Ducla-Soares M.M., Catela Nunes L., Polomé P. Consistency in mixed demand systems: an application to contingent valuation and travel cost data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2004, 86(2):444-454.
5. Eaufrance, 2009. Atlas des zones conchylicoles. http://www.zones-conchylicoles.eaufrance.fr.
6. Egan K., Herriges J. Multivariate count data regression models with individual panel data from an on-site sample. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2006, 52:567-581.
7. Englin J., Cameron T.A. Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. Environmental & Resource Economics 1996, 7:133-147.
8. Englin J., Shonkwiler J.S. Estimating social welfare using count data models: an application to long-run recreation demand under conditions of endogenous stratification and truncation. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1995, 77:104-112.
9. Freeman A.M. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values 2003, Resources for the Future Press, Washington D.C.
10. Etude relative à la pêche de loisir (récréative et sportive) en mer en M étropole et dans les DOM, Octobre 2007, French Ministry of Agriculture and Fishery, http://agriculture.gouv.fr/.
11. Haab T.C., McConnell K.E. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources, The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation 2002, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
12. Hammitt J.K., Graham J.D. Willingness to pay for health protection: inadequate sensitivity to probability?. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1999, 18:33-62.
13. Hanley N., Bell D., Alvarez-Farizo B. Valuing the Benefit of Coastal Water Quality Improvements Using Contingent and Real Behaviour. Environmental and Resource Economics 2003, 24:273-285.
14. Hausman J., Hall H.B., Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 1984, 52:909-938.
15. Hilbe J.M. Negative Binomial Regression 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
16. Evaluation de la fréquentation des zones de p êche récréative, durant les grandes marées de 1997, IFREMER, Dé cembre 1998, R.INT.DEL/NANTES/98.19.
17. Données relatives aux Toxi-infections alimentaires collectives (Tiac) déclaré es en France en 2006 et 2007, Institut National de la Veille Sanitaire, http://www.invs.sante.fr/surveillance/tiac/donnees_2007/Tiac_donnes_2006_2007.pdf.
18. Kragt M.E., Roebeling P.C., Ruijs A. Effects of Great Barrier Reef degradation on recreational reef-trip demand: a contingent behaviour approach. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2009, 53:213-229.
19. Moeltner K., Shonkwiler J.S. Correcting for on-site sampling in random utility models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2005, 87(2):327-339.
20. Guide for the Control of Molluscan Shellfish, National Shellfish Sanitation Program, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration 2005, NSSP.
21. Shaw D. On-site samples' regression: problems of non-negative integers, truncation, and endogenous stratification. Journal of Econometrics 1988, 37:211-223.
22. Smith R.D. Construction of the contingent valuation market in health care: a critical assessment. Health Economics 2003, 12:609-628.
23. von Haefen R.H. Empirical strategies for incorporating weak complementarity into consumer demand models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2007, 54:15-31.
24. Whitehead J.C., Haab T.C., Huang J.C. Measuring recreation benefits of quality improvements with revealed and stated behavior data. Resource and Energy Economics 2000, 22:339-354.
25. Whitehead J.C., Pattanayak K.S.K., Van Houtven G.L., Gelso B.R. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science. Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, Working Paper 05-19 2005.
26. Whitehead J.C., Dumas C.F., Herstine J., Hill J., Buerger B. Valuing beach access and width with revealed and stated preferences data. Marine Resource Economics 2008, 23:119-135.
27. Whitehead J.C., Phaneuf D.J., Dumas C.F., Herstine J., Hill J., Buerger B. Convergent validity of revealed and stated recreation behavior with quality change: a comparison of multiple and single site demands. Environmental & Resource Economics 2010, 45:91-112.