Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 65-84

  Adamowicz, Wiktor ^a   Swait, Joffre ^b   Boxall, Peter ^c   Louviere, Jordan ^e   Williams, Michael ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c NORTHERN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

^d Intelligent Marketing Systems   (Canada)

^e NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030905446     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1996.0957     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adamowicz W. L., Louviere J., Williams M. Combining stated and revealed preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. J. Environ. Econom. Manage. 26:1994;271-292.
2. Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. 1985;MIT Press, Cambridge.
3. Ben-Akiva M., Morikawa T. Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions. Transport. Res. A. 24:1990;485-495.
4. Cameron T. A. Combining contingent valuation and travel cost data for the valuation of nonmarket goods. Land Econom. 68:1992;302-317.
5. R. T. Carson, J. J. Louviere, D. Anderson, P. Arabie, D. S. Bunch, D. A. Hensher, R. M. Johnson, W. F. Kuhfeld, D. Steinberg, J. Swait, H. Timmermans, J. B. Wiley, 1994, Experimental analysis of choice, Marketing Letters: Special Issue on the Duke Invitational Conference on Consumer Decision Making and Choice Behaviour.
6. W. M. Hanemann, 1984, Applied Welfare Analysis with Quantitative Response Models, University of California, Berkeley.
7. Horowitz J. Statistical comparison of non-nested probabilistic discrete choice models. Transport. Sci. 17:1982;319-350.
8. Kaoru Y., Smith V. K., Liu J. L. Using random utility models to estimate the recreational value of estuarine resources. Amer. J. Agri. Econom. 77:1995;141-151.
9. Louviere J. J., Woodworth G. G. Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: An approach based on aggregate data. J. Market. Res. 20:1983;350-367.
10. J. J. Louviere, 1994, Relating Stated Preference Measures and Models to Choices in Real Markets: Calibration of CV Responses.
11. McConnell K. E. Indirect methods for assessing natural resource damages under CERCLA. Kopp J., Smith V. K. Valuing Natural Assets. 1993;153-196.
12. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. Zarembka P. Frontiers in Econometrics. 1974;105-142 Academic Press, New York.
13. K. McLeod, P. C. Boxall, W. L. Adamowicz, M. Williams, J. J. Louviere, 1993, The Incorporation of Non-timber Goods and Services in Integrated Resource Management, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
14. K. McLeod, 1995, Perceived Site Quality in Random Utility Models, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta.
15. Morey E. R., Rowe R. D., Watson M. A repeated nested-logit model of Atlantic salmon fishing with comparisons to six other travel-cost models. Amer. J. Agr. Econom. 75:1993;578-592.
16. NTELOGIT: Multinomial Logistic Regression Software. 1992;Intelligent Marketing Systems, Edmonton.
17. Peters T., Adamowicz W., Boxall P. The influence of choice set considerations in modelling the benefits of improved water quality. Water Resources Res. 613:1995;1781-1787.
18. Shelby B. Crowding models for backcountry recreation. Land Econom. 56:1980;43-55.
19. Swait J., Louviere J. J. The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. J. Market. Res. 30:1993;305-314.
20. Swait J., Louviere J. J., Williams M. A sequential approach to exploiting the combined strength of SP and RP data: Application to freight shipper choice. Transportation. 21:1994;135-152.