Empirical strategies for incorporating weak complementarity into consumer demand models

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 15-31

  von Haefen, Roger H ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumer demand modeling; Quality; Weak complementarity; Welfare measurement

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; QUALITY OF SERVICE; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CONSUMER DEMAND MODELING; EMPIRICAL STRATEGIES; TRACTABILITY; WEAK COMPLEMENTARITY;

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS;

COMPLEMENTARITY; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; DEMAND ANALYSIS;

EID: 34250737402     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: 10960449     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2006.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allenby G., and Lenk P. Modeling household purchase behavior with logistic normal regression. J. Amer. Statistical Assoc. 89 428 (1994) 669-679
2. Bockstael N., Hanemann M., and Strand I. Measuring the benefits of water quality improvements using recreation demand models (1986), Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
3. Bradford D., and Hildebrandt G. Observable preferences for public goods. J. Public Econ. 8 2 (1977) 111-131
4. Bullock D., and Minot N. On measuring the value of a non-market good using market data. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 88 4 (2006) 961-973
5. Cameron T.A. Combining contingent valuation and travel cost data for the valuation of nonmarket goods. Land Econ. 68 3 (1992) 302-317
6. Fisher F.M., and Shell K. Taste and quality change in the pure theory of the true cost-of-living index. In: Wolfe J. (Ed). Value, Capital and Growth: Papers in Honor of Sir John Hicks (1968), Aldine Publishing, Chicago
7. Hanemann M. Discrete-continuous models of consumer demand. Econometrica 52 3 (1984) 541-561
8. Hausman J. Exact consumer's surplus and deadweight loss. Amer. Econ. Rev. 71 4 (1981) 662-676
9. Herriges J., Kling C., and Phaneuf D. What's the use? Welfare estimates from reveal preference models when weak complementarity does not hold. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 17 1 (2004) 55-70
10. Kim J., Allenby G., and Rossi P. Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Sci. 21 3 (2002) 229-250
11. Kuriyama K., and Hanemann M. The integer programming approach to a generalized corner solution problem, Working Paper, School of Political Science and Economics (2005), Waseda University, Tokyo
12. LaFrance J., and Hanemann W.M. The dual structure of incomplete demand systems. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 71 2 (1989) 262-274
13. Larson D. Recovering weakly complementary preferences. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 21 2 (1991) 97-108
14. Mäler K. Environmental Economics: A Theoretical Inquiry (1974), Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Baltimore
15. Muellbauer J. Community preferences and the representative consumer. Econometrica 44 5 (1976) 979-999
16. Palmquist R. Weak complementarity, path independence, and the intuition of the Willig condition. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 49 1 (2005) 103-115
17. Parsons G., Massey M., and Tomasi T. Familiar and favorite sites in a random utility model of beach recreation. Marine Resource Econ. 14 4 (1999) 299-315
18. Pollak R., and Wales T. Demand System Specification and Estimation (1999), Oxford University Press, New York
19. Smith V.K., and Banzhaf S. A diagrammatic exposition of weak complementarity and the Willig condition. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 86 2 (2004) 455-466
20. Train K. Discrete Choice Analysis with Simulation (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
21. Vartia Y. Efficient methods of measuring welfare change and compensated income in terms of ordinary demand functions. Econometrica 51 1 (1983) 140-153
22. R. von Haefen, Valuing environmental quality within a repeated discrete-continuous framework, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham, NC, 1999.
23. von Haefen R. Incorporating observed choice into the construction of welfare measures from random utility models. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 45 2 (2003) 145-165
24. von Haefen R. Latent consideration sets and continuous demand system models, Working Paper (2005), Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh
25. von Haefen R., and Phaneuf D. Kuhn-Tucker demand system approaches to non-market valuation. In: Scarpa R., and Alberini A. (Eds). Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics (2005), Springer, Drodrecht
26. von Haefen R., Phaneuf D., and Parsons G. Estimation and welfare analysis with large demand systems. J. Bus. Econ. Statist. 22 2 (2004) 194-205
27. Wales T., and Woodland A. Estimation of consumer demand systems with binding non-negativity constraints. J. Econometrics 21 3 (1983) 263-285
28. Willig R. Incremental consumer's surplus and hedonic price adjustment. J. Econ. Theory 17 2 (1978) 227-253