Fast acceptance by common experience: FACE-recognition in schelling's model of neighborhood segregation

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 391-410

  Berg, Nathan ^a   Hoffrage, Ulrich ^b   Abramczuk, Katarzyna ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Discrimination; Ethnic; Heuristic; Institutional design; Lexicographic; Non compensatory; Urban economics

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956998702     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19302975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Aktipis, C. A. (2006). Recognition memory and the evolution of cooperation: How simple strategies succeed in an agent-based world. Adaptive Behavior, 14, 239-247.
2. Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 1243-1284.
3. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: AddisonWesley.
4. Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2004). Fortress UK? Gated communities, the spatial revolt of the elites and timeapace trajectories of segregation. Housing Studies, 19, 875-892.
5. Aydinonat, N. E. (2007). Models, conjectures and exploration: An analysis of Schelling's checkerboard model of residential segregation. Journal of Economic Methodology, 14, 429-454.
6. Baughman, R. A. (2004). Racial segregation and the effectiveness of expanding public health insurance for children. Working Paper, University of New Hampshire.
7. Bayer, P, McMillan, R. & Rueben, K. (2004). What drives racial segregation?: New evidence using census microdata. Journal of Urban Economics, 56, 514-535.
8. Berg, N., Abramczuk, K., & Hoffrage, U. (in press). Fast Acceptance by Common Experience: Augmenting Schelling's neighborhood segregation model with FACE-recognition. In R. Hertwig, U. Hoffrage, & the ABC Research Group. Simple Heuristics in a Social World. Oxford University Press.
9. Berg, N., & Faria, J. (2008). Negatively correlated author seniority and the number of acknowledged people: Name-recognition as a signal of scientific merit? Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 1234-1247.
10. Berg, N., & Hoffrage, U. (2008). Rational ignoring with unbounded cognitive capacity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 792-809.
11. Berg, N., & Maital, S. (2007). Tailoring globalization to national needs and wellbeing: One size never fits all. Global Business and Economics Review, 9, 319-334.
12. Bøg, M. (2005). Revisiting Schelling's spatial proximity model. Working Paper, University College London.
13. Bøg, M. (2006). Is segregation robust? Working Paper, Stockholm School of Economics.
14. Bolton, G. E., Katok, E., & Ockenfels, A. (2004). How effective are electronic reputation mechanisms? An experimental investigation. Management Science, 50, 1587-1602.
15. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2004). The evolution of strong reciprocity: Cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theoretical Population Biology, 65, 17-28.
16. Brender, A. (2005). Ethnic segregation and the quality of local government in the minorities localities: Local tax collection in the Israeli-Arab municipalities as a case study. Discussion Paper, vol. 05.01, Bank of Israel.
17. Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1988). Contact and cooperation: When do they work? In P. Katz & D. Taylor (Eds), Eliminating racism: Means and controversies (pp. 315-326). New York: Plenum Press.
18. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-27.
19. Bruch, E. E., & Mare, R. D. (2003). Neighborhood Choice and Neighborhood Change. Working Paper, California Center for Population Research On-Line Working Papers Series.
20. Clark, W. A. V. (1991). Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: A test of the Schelling segregation model. Demography, 28, 1-19.
21. Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press.
22. Colman, A. M. (2006). Thomas C. Schelling's psychological decision theory: Introduction to a special issue. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 603-608.
23. Cutler, D. M., & Glaeser, E. L. (1997). Are ghettos good or bad? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 827-72.
24. DiPrete, T. A., Gelman, A., McCormick, T., Teitler, J., & Zheng, T. (2010). Segregation in social networks based on acquaintanceship and trust. Working Paper, Columbia University.
25. Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2005). Beyond the optimal contact strategy. American Psychologist, 60, 697-711.
26. Dovidio, J. F., Glick, P., & Rudman, L. S. (Eds.) (2005). On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years after Allport. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
27. Ellen, I. G. (1998). Stable racial integration in the contemporary United States: An empirical overview. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20, 27-42.
28. Epstein, J. M. & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
29. Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., Dovidio, J. F., & Hodson, G. (2005). Instrumental relations among groups: Group competition, conflict, and prejudice. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the Nature of Prejudice. Fifty Years After Allport (pp. 227-243). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
30. Flache, A. & Hegselmann, R. (2001). Do Irregular Grids make a Difference? Relaxing the Spatial Regularity Assumption in Cellular Models of Social Dynamics. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4, http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/4/6.html.
31. Fossett, M. (2006). Preferences, social distance dynamics, and residential segregation: Theoretical explanations using simulation analysis. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 30, 185-274.
32. Fossett, M., & Waren, W. (2005). Overlooked implications of ethnic preferences for residential segregation in agent-basedmodels. Urban Studies, 42, 1893-1917.
33. Gigerenzer, G. (2006). Follow the leader. Harvard Business Review, February, 58-59.
34. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group (1999). Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Gilbert, N. (2002). Varieties of emergence. Paper presented at the Agent 2002 Conference: Social Agents: Ecology, Exchange, and Evolution. Chicago.
36. Glaeser, E, & Vigdor, J. L. (2001). Racial segregation in the 2000 Census: Promising news. Brookings Institution Survey Series. Washington: Brookings Institution.
37. Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (1999). The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd & the ABC Research Group. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (pp. 37-58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109, 75-90.
39. Hanaki, N., Ishikawa, R., & Akiyama, E. (2009). Learning games. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33, 1739-1756.
40. Harpham, E. J. (2004). Gratitude in the history of ideas. In R. A. Emmons & M. E. McCullough (Eds.), The Psychology of Gratitude (pp. 9-37). New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Hewstone, M. (1996). Contact and categorization: socialpsychological interventions to change intergroup relations. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stagnor & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Foundations of Stereotypes and Stereotyping (pp. 323-368). New York: Guilford.
42. Homans, G. C. (1950). The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
43. Huttman, E. D, Saltman, J., & Blauw, W. (1991). Urban Housing Segregation of Minorities in Western Europe and the United States. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
44. Kaneko,M., & Kline, J. J. (2008). Inductive game theory: A basic scenario. Journal ofMathematical Economics, 44, 1332-1363.
45. Laurie, A. J., & Jaggi, N. K. (2003). Role of 'vision' in neighbourhood racial segregation: A variant of the Schelling segregationmodel. Urban Studies, 40, 2687-2704.
46. Miller, N. (2002). Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 387-410.
47. Musterd, S., Premius, H., & van Kempen, R. (1999). Towards undivided cities: The potential of economic revitalisation and housing redifferentiation. Housing Studies, 14, 573-584.
48. Nakamaru, M., & Kawata, M. (2002). Evolution of rumors that discriminate lying defectors. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 6, 261-283.
49. Nechyba, T. J. (2003). School finance, spatial income segregation and the nature of communities. Journal of Urban Economics, 54, 61-88.
50. Nyden, P., Lukehart, J., Maly, M. T., & Peterman, W. (1998). Neighborhood racial and ethnic diversity in U.S. cities. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 4, 1-17.
51. Omer, I. (2005). How ethnicity influences residential distributions: An agent-based simulation. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 32, 657-672.
52. Pancs, R., & Vriend, N. J. (2007). Shelling's spatial proximity model of segregation revisited. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1-24.
53. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
54. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.
55. Portugali, J., Benenson, I., & Omer, I. (1994). Sociospatial residential dynamics: Stability and instability within a self-organized city. Geographical Analysis, 26, 321-340.
56. Rothbart,M., & John, O. P. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 81-104.
57. Schelling, T. C. (1969). Models of segregation. The American Economic Review, 59, 488-493.
58. Schelling, T. C. (1971a). Dynamicmodels of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143-186.
59. Schelling, T. C. (1971b). On the ecology of micromotives. The Public Interest, 25, 61-98.
60. Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
61. Schneider, D. (2004). The Psychology of Stereotyping. New York: Guilford.
62. Schweinberger, S. R., Pickering, E. C., Burton, A. M., & Kaufmann, J. M. (2002). Human brain potential correlates of repetition priming in face and name recognition. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2057-2073.
63. Semenza, C., & Sgaramella, T. M. (1993). Production of proper names: A clinical case study of the effects of phonemic cueing. In G. Cohen & D. M. Burke (Eds.), Memory for Proper Names (pp. 265-280). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
64. Semenza, C., & Zettin, M. (1989). Evidence from aphasia for the role of proper names as pure referring expressions. Nature, 342, 678-679.
65. Sethi, R. & Somanathan, R. (2004). Inequality and segregation. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 1296-1321.
66. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J. White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
67. Smith, A. (1759/2008). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved July 6, 2010 from http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smMS1.html.
68. Sudgen, R. (1986). The Economics of Rights, Cooperation and Welfare. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
69. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorisation and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
70. Tajfel, H., & Turner J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-53). Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole.
71. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M., Oakes, P., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
72. Vinkovi ́c, D., & Kirman, A. (2006). A physical analogue to the Schelling model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103, 19261-19265.
73. Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (2000). The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 116-132.
74. Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., & Kiyonari, T. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity, ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 161-197.
75. Yizhaq, H., Portnov, B. A., & Meron, E. (2004). A mathematical model of segregation patterns in residential neighbourhoods. Environment and Planning A, 36, 147-172.
76. Young, H. P. (1998). Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
77. Young, H. P. (2001). The dynamics of conformity. In S. N. Durlauf & H. P. Young (Eds.) Social Dynamics (pp. 133-153). Washington, D.C./Cambridge, MA: Brookings Institution Press/MIT Press.
78. Zajonc R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27.
79. Zhang, J. (2004a). A dynamic model of residential segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 28, 147-170.
80. Zhang, J. (2004b). Residential segregation in allintegrationist world. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54, 533-550.
81. Zhang, J. (in press). Tipping and residential segregation: A unified Shellingmodel. Journal of Regional Science.