Do irregular grids make a difference? Relaxing the spatial regularity assumption in cellular models of social dynamics

JASSS

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2001, Pages

  Flache, Andreas ^a   Hegselmann, Rainer ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Cellular Automata; Sensitivity Analysis; Social Simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242436716     PISSN: 14607425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. AXELROD, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
2. BLACKBURN, J.M. 1936. "Acquisition of Skill: An Analysis of Learning Curves". IHRB Report 73. Reference taken from Erev, I. and A.E. Roth. 1998. "Predicting how People play Games: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibria." American Economic Review 88(4):848-879.
3. BLACKBURN, J.M. 1936. "Acquisition of Skill: An Analysis of Learning Curves". IHRB Report 73. Reference taken from Erev, I. and A.E. Roth. 1998. "Predicting how People play Games: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibria." American Economic Review 88(4):848-879.
4. BUSH, R. R., Mosteller, F. 1955. Stochastic models for learning. New York: Wiley.
5. DOREIAN, P., F. N. Stokman (eds). 1996. The Evolution of Social Networks. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
6. EREV, I., Y. Bereby-Meyer and A.E. Roth. 1999. "The effect of adding a constant to all payoffs: experimental investigation , and implications for reinforcement learning models." Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 39: 111-128.
7. FLACHE, A., Macy, M. W. 1996. "The Weakness of Strong Ties: Collective action failure in a highly cohesive group". Journal of Mathematical Sociology 21, 3-28.
8. FLACHE, A, Hegselmann, R. 1998. "Rational vs. Adaptive Egoism in Support Networks: How different micro foundations shape different macro hypotheses". Pp. 261-275 in: Leinfellner, W. & Köhler, E. (eds.): Game Theory, Experience, Rationality. Foundations of Social Sciences, Economics and Ethics. In Honor of John C. Harsanyi [Yearbook of the Institute Vienna Circle 5]. Dordrecht: Kluver.
9. FLACHE, A, Hegselmann, R. 1999. "Rationality vs. Learning in the Evolution of Solidarity Networks: A Theoretical Comparison". Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 5:2:97-127.
10. FLACHE, Hegselmann, R. 2000. Abschlußbericht des DFG-Projektes "Dynamik sozialer Dilemma-Situationen". (Final research report of the DFG-Project "Dynamics of social dilemma situations"). University of Bayreuth, Department of Philosophie. URL (German text): 〈http://www.uni-bayreuth.de/departments/philosophie/deutsch/dfg/index. html〉
11. Flache, A. and M. W. Macy. 2001. "Stochastic Collusion and the Power Law of Learning." ISCORE Working Paper No. 189. Utrecht University: Institute for the Study of Cooperative Relations.
12. FRIEDMAN, J.W. 1971. "A Non-Co-operative Equilibrium for Supergames". Review of Economic Studies 38:1-12.
13. FRIEDMAN, J.W (1986) Game Theory with Applications to Economics, 2nd ed. 1991. Oxford UP, Cambridge.
14. HEIDER, F. 1946. "Attitudes and Cognitive Organization". Journal of Psychology 21:107-112.
15. HEGSELMANN, R. 1996. "Cellular Automata in the Social Sciences - perspectives, restrictions, and artefacts". Pp. , 209-234 in: Hegselmann, R., K.G. Troitzsch, U. Mueller (eds.): Modelling and Simulation in the Social Sciences from the Philosophy of Science Point of View (Theory and Decision Library). Dordrecht: Kluver.
16. HEGSELMANN, R. 1998. "Modelling Social Dynamics by Cellular Automata". Pp. 37-64 in: Liebrand, W. B. G., A. Nowak, R. Hegselmann, R. (eds.): Computer Modelling and the Study of Dynamical Social Processes. London: Sage.
17. HEGSELMANN, R., A. Flache 1998. "Understanding Complex Social Dynamics: A Plea For Cellular Automata Based Modelling". In: Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 1: 〈http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1/3/1.html〉
18. HEGSELMANN, R., A. FLACHE, V. Möller 2000. "Cellular Automata as a Modelling Tool: Solidarity and Opinion Formation". Pp. 151-178 in: Suleiman, R., K.G. Troitzsch, N. Gilbert (eds.). Tools and Techniques for Social Science Simulation. Heidelberg: Physica.
19. HUBERMAN, B.A., N.S. Glance, 1993. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A 90:7716-7718.
20. LATANéâ, B., A. Nowak. 1997. "Self-Organizing Social Systems: Necessary and sufficient conditions for the emergence of clustering, consolidation and continuing diversity". Pp. 43-74 in: Barnet, G. & Boster, F. (eds.): Progress in communication science: Persuasion, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
21. MACY, M. W. 1991. "Learning to Cooperate: Stochastic and tacit collusion in social exchange". American Journal of Sociology 97, 808-843.
22. NOWAK, M. A., R.M. May, 1993. "The Spatial Dilemmas of Evolution". International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 3: 35-78.
23. NOWAK, M., S. Bonhoeffer, R.M. MAY, 1994. "Spatial Games and the Maintenance of cooperation". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 91:4877-4881.
24. OLSON, M. Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
25. OKABE, A., B. Boots, K. Sugihara, 1992. Spatial Tessellations - Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
26. SAKODA, J.M. 1971. "The Checkerboard Model of Social Interaction". Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1: 119-132.
27. SCHELLING, T. 1971. "Dynamic Models of Segregation". Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1: 143-186.
28. TAYLOR, M. 1987. The Possibility of Cooperation (revised edition of: Anarchy and Cooperation, 1976). London:Wiley & Sons.
29. THORNDIKE, E.L. 1898. "Animal Intelligence. An Experimental Study of the Associative Processes in Animals". Psychological Monographs 2.8.
30. UPTON, G.J.G., B. Fingleton, 1985. Spatial Data Analysis by Example. Vol. 98. New York: Wiley.
31. ZEGGELINK, E 1996. "Evolving friendship networks: An individual orientied approach implementing similarity". Social Networks 17:83-110.
32. ZEGGELINK, E 1994. "Dynamics of structure: An individual orientied approach". Social Networks 16:295- 333.