A stand density index for complex mixed species forests in the northeastern United States

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 260, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1613-1622

  Ducey, Mark J ^a   Knapp, Rachel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Competition; Density management; Relative density

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE PREDICTION; CARBON ACCUMULATION; DENSITY MANAGEMENT; DENSITY MEASURES; FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM DENSITY; MIXED-SPECIES FORESTS; MORTALITY RISK; QUANTILE REGRESSION; RELATIVE DENSITY; SPECIFIC GRAVITY; STAND DENSITIES; STAND DENSITY INDEX; US FOREST SERVICE;

COMPETITION; ECOLOGY; EQUATIONS OF STATE; FORESTRY; RISK PERCEPTION;

DENSITY (SPECIFIC GRAVITY);

CARBON FIXATION; CONIFEROUS TREE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; MIXED FOREST; MORTALITY RISK; PHYTOMASS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

BIOMASS; CARBON; COMPETITION; DENSITY; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; MORTALITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFTWOODS; USA;

UNITED STATES;

CONIFEROPHYTA;

EID: 77956985432     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.08.014     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alden, H.A., 1995. Hardwoods of North America. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-83, Madison, WI.
2. Assmann E. The Principles of Forest Yield Study 1970, Gardiner, S.H. (trans.) Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.
3. Bechtold, W.A., Patterson, P.L. (Eds.), 2005. The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program-national sampling design and estimation procedures. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-80, Asheville, NC.
4. Bi H. The self-thinning surface. For. Sci. 2001, 47:361-370.
5. Bi H. Stochastic frontier analysis of a classic self-thinning experiment. Aust. Ecol. 2004, 29:408-417.
6. Burns, R.M., Honkala, B.H. (Tech. coords.), 1990. Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2. Hardwoods. USDA For. Serv. Agriculture Handbook 654, Washington, DC.
7. Cade B.S., Noon B.R. A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2003, 1(8):412-420.
8. Chisman H.H., Schumacher F.X. On the tree - area ratio and certain of its applications. J. For. 1940, 38:311-317.
9. Chui, Y.H., 1993. Evaluation of some structural properties of lumber from Norway spruce trees grown in the Maritimes. Fredericton, NB: Rep. No. FC9208, Wood Science and Technology Centre, University of New Brunswick.
10. Chui Y.H., MacKinnon-Peters G. Wood properties of exotic larch grown in eastern Canada and north-eastern United States. For. Chron. 1995, 71(5):639-646.
11. Curtis R.O. Stand density measures: an interpretation. For. Sci. 1970, 16(4):403-414.
12. Curtis R.O. A tree area power function and related density measures for Douglas-fir. For. Sci. 1971, 17(2):146-159.
13. Curtis, R.O., Marshall, D.D., 2005. Permanent-plot procedures for silvicultural and yield research. USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-634, Portland, Oregon.
14. de Montigny L., Nigh G. Density frontiers for even-aged Douglas-fir and western hemlock stands in coastal British Columbia. For. Sci. 2007, 53(6):675-682.
15. Dean T.J., Baldwin V.C. The relationship between Reineke's stand-density index and physical stem mechanics. For. Ecol. Manage. 1996, 81:25-34.
16. Ducey M.J., Larson B.C. Thinning decisions using stand density indices: the influence of uncertainty. West. J. Appl. For. 1997, 12:89-92.
17. Ducey M.J., Larson B.C. Accounting for bias and variance in nonlinear stand density indices. For. Sci. 1999, 45:452-457.
18. Ducey M.J., Larson B.C. Is there a correct stand density index? An alternate interpretation. West. J. Appl. For. 2003, 18(3):179-184.
19. Forest Products Laboratory, 1999. Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. GTR-113, Madison, WI.
20. Forest Products Laboratory, 2008. Technology transfer fact sheet: acer spp. [online]. Available from (accessed 09.10.08). http://www2.fpl.fs.fed.us/TechSheets/HardwoodNA/pdf_files/acerspeng.pdf.
21. Frothingham E.H. White Pine Under Forest Management 1914, USDA Agric. Bull., Washington, DC, p. 13.
22. Gilmore D.W., Briggs R.D. A stocking guide for European larch in eastern North America. North. J. Appl. For. 2003, 20(1):34-38.
23. Gingrich S.F. Measuring and evaluating stocking and stand density in Upland Hardwood forests in the Central States. For. Sci. 1967, 13:38-53.
24. Halligan J.P., Nyland R.D. Relative density guide for Norway spruce plantations in central New York. North. J. Appl. For. 1999, 16(3):154-159.
25. Jenkins, J.C., Chojnacky, D.C., Heath, L.S., Birdsey, R.A., 2003. Comprehensive database of diameter-based biomass regressions for North American tree species. USDA For. Serv. Northeastern Research Station Gen.Tech. Report NE-319, Newtown Square, PA.
26. Koenker, R., 2004. Quantreg: An R package for quantile regression and related methods [online]. Available from (accessed 19.10.08). http://cran.r-project.org/.
27. Koenker R. Quantile Regression 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. Koenker R., Bassett G. Regression quantiles. Econometrika 1978, 46:33-50.
29. Kucera B., Naess R.M. Tre - naturens vakreste råstoff 1999, Landbruksforlaget, Oslo.
30. Kurz W.A., Stinson G., Rampley G.J., Dymond C.C., Neilson E.T. Risk of natural disturbances makes future contribution of Canada's forests to the global carbon cycle highly uncertain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105:1551-1555.
31. Leak, W.B., Solomon, D.S., DeBald, P.S., 1987. Silvicultural guide for northern hardwood types in the Northeast (revised). USDA For.Serv. Res. Pap. NE-603, Broomall, PA.
32. Lindroth A., Lagergran F., Grelle A., Klemedtsson L., Langvall O., Weslien P., Tuulik J. Storms can cause Europe-wide reduction in forest carbon sink. Global Change Biol. 2009, 15:346-355.
33. Long J.N. A practical approach to density management. For. Chron. 1985, 61:23-27.
34. Long J.N. Using Stand Density Index to regulate stocking in uneven-aged stands. In: Uneven-Aged Management-Opportunities, Constraints, and Methodologies 1995, vol. 56. Montana Forest and Conservation Experiment Station, pp. 110-122.
35. Long J.N., Daniel T.W. Assessment of growing stock in uneven-aged stands. West. J. Appl. For. 1990, 5(3):93-96.
36. Maeglin R.R., Ohmann L.F. Boxelder (Acer negundo): a review and commentary. Bull. Torrey Botanical Club 1973, 100(6):357-363.
37. Markwardt, L.J., 1930. Comparative strength properties of woods grown in the United States. USDA For. Serv. Tech. Bulletin No. 158, Washington, DC, p. 39.
38. Miles, P.D., Smith, W.B., 2009. Specific gravity and other properties of wood and bark for 156 tree species found in North America. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note NRS-38, Newtown Square, PA.
39. Nugent J., Boniface J. Permaculture Plants: A Selection 2005, Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Jct., VT.
40. Panshin A.J., de Zeeuw C. Textbook of Wood Technology 1970, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York. 3rd ed.
41. Penner M. Yield prediction for mixed species stands in boreal Ontario. For. Chron. 2008, 84(1):46-52.
42. Philbrook, J.S., Barrett, J.P., Leak, W.B., 1973. A stocking guide for eastern white pine. USDA For. Serv. Research Note NE-168, Upper Darby, PA.
43. Pittman S.D., Turnblom E.C. A study of self-thinning using coupled allometric equations: Implications for coastal Douglas-fir stand dynamics. Can. J. For. Res. 2003, 33:1661-1669.
44. Poage N.J., Marshall D.D., McClellan M.H. Maximum stand-density index of 40 western hemlock-sitka spruce stands in southeast Alaska. West. J. Appl. For. 2007, 22(2):99-104.
45. Pretzsch H. Stand density and growth of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.): evidence from long-term experimental plots. Eur. J. For. Res. 2005, 124(3):193-205.
46. Pretzsch H., Biber P. A re-evaluation of Reineke's rule and stand density index. For. Sci. 2005, 51(4):304-319.
47. Puettmann K.J., Hibbs D.E., Hann D.W. The dynamics of mixed stands of Alnus rubra and Pseudotsuga menziesii: extension of size-density analysis to species mixture. J. Ecol. 1992, 80:449-458.
48. R Development Core Team, 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, version 2.7.2 (2008-08-25). Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from (accessed 19.10.08). http://www.r-project.org/.
49. Record S.J., Hess R.W. Timbers of the New World 1943, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
50. Reineke L.H. Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests. J. Agric. Res. 1933, 46:627-638.
51. Reynolds J.H., Ford E.D. Improving competition representation in theoretical models of self-thinning: a critical review. J. Ecol. 2005, 93:362-372.
52. Scharf F.S., Juanes F., Sutherland M. Inferring ecological relationships from the edges of scatter diagrams: comparison of regression techniques. Ecology 1998, 79(2):448-460.
53. Shaw J.D. Application of stand density index to irregularly structured stands. West. J. Appl. For. 2000, 15(1):40-42.
54. Shaw J.D. Reineke's stand density index: where do we go from here?. Proceedings: Society of American Foresters 2005 National Convention 2006, Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD.
55. Solomon D.S., Zhang L. Maximum size-density relationships for mixed softwoods in the northeastern USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 2002, 155:163-170.
56. Stout S.L., Nyland R.D. Role of species composition in relative density measurement in Allegheny hardwoods. Can. J. For. Res. 1986, 16:574-579.
57. Stout S.L., Marquis D.A., Ernst R.L. A relative density measure for mixed-species stands. J. For. 1987, 7:45-47.
58. Swift E., Penner M., Gagnon R., Knox J.A. Stand density management diagram for spruce-balsam fir mixtures in New Brunswick. For. Chron. 2007, 83(2):187-197.
59. Turnblom E.C., Burk T.E. Modeling self-thinning of unthinned Lake States red pine stands using nonlinear simultaneous differential equations. Can. J. For. Res. 2000, 30:1410-1418.
60. VanderSchaaf C.L., Burkhart H.E. Comparison of methods to estimate Reineke's maximum size-density relationship species boundary slope. For. Sci. 2007, 53(3):435-442.
61. Weiskittel A., Gould P., Temesgen H. Sources of variation in the self-thinning line for three species of varying shade tolerance. For. Sci. 2009, 55(1):84-93.
62. Woodall C.W., Miles P.D., Vissage J.S. Determining maximum stand density index in mixed species stands for strategic-scale stocking assessments. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 216:367-377.
63. Woodall C.W., Perry C.H., Miles P.D. The relative density of forests in the United States. For. Ecol. Manage. 2006, 226:368-372.
64. Yoda K., Kira T., Ogawa H., Hozumi K. Intraspecific competition among higher plants. XI. Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. J. Biol. Osaka City Univ. 1963, 14:107-129.
65. Zeide B. How to measure stand density. Trees 2005, 19:1-14.
66. Zhang L., Bi H., Gove J.H., Heath L.S. A comparison of alternative methods for estimating the self-thinning boundary line. Can. J. For. Res. 2005, 35:1507-1514.