A comparison of alternative methods for estimating the self-thinning boundary line

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1507-1514

  Zhang, Lianjun ^a   Bi, Huiquan ^b   Gove, Jeffrey H ^c   Heath, Linda S ^c  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b Research and Development Division   (Australia)

^c USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

DATA POINTS; MODEL FITTING; QUANTILE REGRESSION (QR); STOCHASTIC FRONTIER FUNCTION (SFF);

PLANTS (BOTANY);

BOUNDARY LINE; ESTIMATION METHOD; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF THINNING;

FORESTRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PINUS STROBUS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

PINUS STROBUS;

EID: 26944492221     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x05-070     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aigner, D., and Chu, S. 1968. On estimating the industry production function. Am. Econ. Rev. 58: 826-839.
2. Aigner, D., Lovell, K., and Schmidt, P. 1977. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function model. J. Econ. 6: 21-37.
3. Bi, H. 2001. The self-thinning surface. For. Sci. 47: 361-370.
4. Bi, H. 2004. Stochastic frontier analysis of a classic self-thinning experiment. Austr. Ecol. 29: 408-417.
5. Bi, H., and Turvey, N.D. 1997. A method of selecting data points for fitting the maximum biomass-density line for stand undergoing self-thinning. Aust. J. Ecol. 22: 356-359.
6. Bi, H., Wan, G., and Turvey, N.D. 2000. Estimating the self-thinning boundary line as a density-dependent stochastic biomass frontier. Ecology, 81: 1477-1483.
7. Bi, H., Bruskin, S., and Smith, R.G.B. 2002. The zone of influence of paddock trees and the consequent loss in stand volume growth in young eucalypt plantations. For. Ecol. Manage. 165: 305-315.
8. Blackburn, T.M., Lawton, J.H., and Perry, J.N. 1992. A method of estimating the slope of upper bounds of plots of body size and abundance in natural animal assemblages. Oikos, 65: 107-112.
9. Cade, B.S., Terrell, J.W., and Schroeder, R.L. 1999. Estimating effects of limiting factors with regression quantiles. Ecology, 80: 311-323.
10. Cade, B.S., and Noon, B.R. 2003. A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1: 412-420.
11. Cao, Q.V., Dean, T.J., and Baldwin, V.C., Jr. 2000. Modeling the size-density relationship in direct-seeded slash pine stands. For. Sci. 46: 317-321.
12. Curtis, R.O., and Marshall, D.D. 2000. Why quadratic mean diameter? West. J. Appl. For. 15: 137-139.
13. Drew, J., and Flewelling, J. 1977. Some recent Japanese theories of yield-density relationships and their application to monterrey pine plantations. For. Sci. 23: 517-534.
14. Drew, J., and Flewelling, J. 1979. Stand density management: an alternative approach and its application to Douglas-fir plantations. For. Sci. 25: 518-532.
15. Econometric Software Inc. 1998. LIMDEP 7.0 user's manual [computer manual]. Econometric Software, Inc., Plainview, N.Y.
16. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., and Lovell, C.A.K. 1994. Production function frontiers. Cambridge University Press, New York.
17. Ford, E.D. 1975. Competition and stand structure in some even-aged plant monocultures. J. Ecol. 63: 311-333.
18. Greene, W.H. 1980. Maximum likelihood estimation of economet-ric frontier functions. J. Econ. 13: 27-56.
19. Greene, W.H. 1993. The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. In The measurement of productive efficiency: techniques and applications. Edited by H.O. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell, and S.S. Schmidt. Oxford University Press, New York. pp. 68-119.
20. Greene, W.H. 1997. Frontier production functions. In Handbook of applied econometrics: microeconomics. Edited by M.H. Pesaran and P. Schmidt. Blackwell, Oxford, UK. pp. 81-166.
21. Greene, W.H. 1998. Econometric analysis. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
22. Guo, Q., and Rundel, P.W. 1998. Self-thinning in early postfire chaparral succession: mechanisms, implications, and a combined approach. Ecology, 79: 579-586.
23. Hutchings, M., and Budd, C. 1981. Plant self-thinning and leaf area dynamics in experimental and natural monocultures. Oikos, 36: 319-325.
24. Jack, S.B., and Long, J.N. 1996. Linkages between silviculture and ecology: an analysis of density management diagrams. For. Ecol. Manage. 86: 205-220.
25. Kaiser, M.S., Speckman, P.L., and Jones, J.R. 1994. Statistical models for limiting nutrient relationships in inland waters. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89: 410-423.
26. Koenker, R., and Bassett, G. 1978. Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46: 33-50.
27. Koenker, R., and Portnoy, S. 1996. Quantile regression. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Commerce and Business Administration, Office of Research Working Paper 97-0100.
28. Kopp, R.J., and Mullahy, J. 1993. Least squares estimation of econometric frontier models: consistent estimation and inference. Scand. J. Econ. 95: 125-132.
29. Kumbhakar, S.C., and Lovell, C.A.K. 2000. Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York.
30. LaBarbera, M. 1989. Analyzing body size as factor in ecology and evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 97-117.
31. Leduc, D.J. 1987. A comparative analysis of the reduced major axis technique of fitting lines to bivariate data. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 654-659.
32. LINDO System Inc. 1998. Solver Suite [computer program]. LINDO System, Inc., Chicago.
33. Long, J., and Smith, F. 1983. Relation between size and density in developing stands: a description and possible mechanisms. For. Ecol. Manage. 7: 191-206.
34. Lonsdale, W. 1990. The self-thinning rule: dead or alive? Ecology, 71: 1373-1388.
35. Maller, R.A. 1990. Some aspects of a mixture model for estimating the boundary of a set of data. J. Cons. Cons. Intl. Explor. Mer, 46: 140-147.
36. Mohler, C., Marks, P., and Sprugel, D. 1978. Stand structure and allometry of trees during self-thinning of pure stands. J. Ecol. 66: 599-614.
37. Niklas, K. 1994. Plant allometry and the scaling of form and process. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
38. Osawa, A., and Sugita, S. 1989. The self-thinning rule: another interpretation of Weller's results. Ecology, 70: 279-283.
39. Osawa, A., and Allen, R. 1993. Allometric theory explains self-thinning relationships of mountain beech and red pine. Ecology, 74: 1020-1032.
40. Reineke, L. 1933. Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests. J. Agric. Res. 46: 627-638.
41. SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8 [computer manual]. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
42. Scharf, F.S., Juanes, F., and Sutherland, M. 1998. Inferring ecological relationships from the edges of scatter diagrams: comparison of regression techniques. Ecology, 79: 448-460.
43. Schmidt, P. 1985-1986. Frontier production functions. Econ. Rev. 4: 289-328.
44. Smith, D.J., and Woods, M.E. 1997. Red pine and white pine density management diagrams for Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Sciences Section, Technical Report No. 48.
45. Solomon, D.S., and Zhang, L. 2002. Maximum size-density relationships for mixed softwoods in the northeastern USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 155: 163-170.
46. Solomon, D.S., Herman, D.A., and Leak, W.B. 1995. FIBER 3.0: an ecological growth model for northeastern forest types. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-204.
47. Stevenson, R. 1980. Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation. J. Econ. 13: 58-66.
48. Thomson, J.D., Weiblen, G., Thomson, B.A., Alfaro, S., and Legendre, P. 1996. Untangling multiple factors in spatial distributions: lilies, gophers and rocks. Ecology, 77: 1698-1715.
49. Weller, D. 1987. A reevaluation of the -3/2 power rule of self-thinning. Ecol. Monogr. 57: 23-43.
50. Weller, D. 1989. The interspecific size-density relationship among crowded plant stands and its implications for the -3/2 power rule of self-thinning. Am. Nat. 133: 20-41.
51. Westoby, M. 1984. The self-thinning rule. Adv. Ecol. Res. 14: 167-225.
52. White, J. 1985. The thinning rule and its application to mixtures of plant populations. In Studies on plant demography. Edited by J. White. Academic Press, London. pp. 291-309.
53. Wilson, J., and Lee, W. 1988. The -3/2 law applied to some gorse communities, with consideration to line fitting. N.Z. J. Bot. 26: 193-196.
54. Wilson, D.S., Seymour, R.S., and Maguire, D.A. 1999. Density management diagram for Northeastern red spruce and balsam fir forests. North. J. Appl. For. 16: 48-56.
55. Yoda, K., Kira, T., Ogawa, H., and Hozumi, K. 1963. Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions: intraspecific competition among higher plants XI. J. Biol. (Osaka City Univ.), 14: 107-129.
56. Zeide, B. 1987. Analysis of the 3/2 power law of self-thinning. For. Sci. 33: 517-537.