Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound in patients with peripheral vascular disease

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 44, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 576-585

  Bueno, Dra Alicia ^a   Acín, Francisco ^a   Cañibano, Dra Cristina ^a   Fernandez Casado, Jose L ^a   Castillo, E ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE GETAFE   (Spain)

Author keywords

contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography; duplex ultrasound; peripheral arterial disease

Indexed keywords

ARTERY DISEASE; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL OCCLUSION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MEGLUMINE; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPAIN; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, DUPLEX;

EID: 77956927773     PISSN: 15385744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1538574410377018     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Eiberg JP, Lundorf E., Thomsen C., Schroeder TV Peripheral vascular surgery and magnetic resonance arteriography- a review. Eur J Endovasc Surg. 2001 ; 22 (5). 396-402.
2. Coffi SB, Ubbink DT, Zwiers I., van Gurp AJM, Legemate DA The value of the peak sustolic velocity ratio in the assessment of the haemodynamic significance of subcritical iliac artery stenoses. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001 ; 22 (5). 424-428.
3. Moneta GL, Strandness DE Jr. Peripheral arterial duplex scanning. J Clin Ultrasound. 1987 ; 15 (9). 645-651.
4. de Vries M., Ouwendijk R., Flobbe K., et al. Peripheral arterial disease: clinical and cost comparisons between duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR Angiography-a multicenter randomized trial. Radiology. 2006 ; 240 (2). 401-410.
5. Mell M., Tefera G., Thornton F., Siepman D., Turnipseed W. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2007 ; 45 (3). 543-548.
6. Binkert CA, Baker PD, Petersen BD, Szumowski J., Kaufman JA Peripheral vascular disease: blinded study of dedicated calf MR angiography versus standard bolus-chase MR angiography and film hard-copy angiography. Radiology. 2004 ; 232 (3). 860-866.
7. Pereless FS, Collins JD, Carr JC, et al. Accuracy of stepping-table lower extremity MR angiography with dual-level bolus timing and separate calf acquisition: hybrid peripheral MR angiography. Radiology. 2006 ; 240 (1). 283-290.
8. Janka R., Wenkel E., Fellner C., Lang W., Bautz W., Uder M. Magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral vessels in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: when is an additional conventional angiography required ? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006 ; 29 (2). 220-229.
9. Visser K., Bosch JL, Leiner T., van Engelshoven JMA, Passchier J., Hunink MGM. Patients' preferences for MR angiography and duplex US in the work-up of peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003 ; 26 (5). 537-534.
10. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2003 ; 138 (1). W1 - W12.
11. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and its major branches. Radiology. 1995 ; 197 (3). 785-792.
12. Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB, et al. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance of the European Society of Cardiology. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus panel report. Eur Heart J. 2004 ; 25 (21). 1940-1965.
13. Dellegrottaglie S., Sanz J., Macaluso F., et al. Technology insight: magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of patients with peripheral disease. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007 ; 4 (12). 677-687.
14. Leiner T., Kessels AGH, Nelemans PJ, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2005 ; 235 (2). 699-708.
15. Gjønnaess E., Morken B., Sandbaek G., et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, colour duplex and digital subtraction angiography of the lower limb arteries from the aorta to the tibio-peroneal trunk in patients with intermittent claudication. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 ; 31 (1). 53-58.
16. Cronberg CN, Sjoberg S., Albrechtsson U., Leander P., Lindh M., Norgren L. Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography. Acta Radiol. 2003 ; 44 (1). 59-66.
17. Steffens JC, Schafer FK, Oberscheid B., Link J., Jahnke T., Heller M. Bolus-chasing contrast-enhanced 3D MRA of the lower extremity. Comparison with intraarterial DSA. Acta Radiol. 2003 ; 44 (2). 185-192.
18. Hatsukami TS, Primozich JF, Zierler RE, Harley JD, Strandness DE Jr. Color Doppler imaging of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 1992 ; 16 (4). 527-533.
19. Sensier Y., Hartshome T., Thrush A., Handford H., Nydahl S., London NJ The effect of adjacent segment disease on the accuracy of colour duplex scanning for the diagnosis of lower limb arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996 ; 12 (2). 238-242.
20. Meissner OA, Rieger J., Weber C., et al. Critical limb ischemia: hybrid MR angiography compared with DSA. Radiology. 2005 ; 235 (1). 308-318.
21. Wikstrom J., Holmberg A., Johansson L., et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and duplex of the iliac arteries compared with intra-arterial pressure gradient measurements. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000 ; 19 (5). 516-523.
22. Lundin P., Svensson A., Henriksen E., et al. Imaging of aortoiliac arterial disease: duplex ultrasound and MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography. Acta Radiol. 2000 ; 41 (2). 125-132.
23. Morasch MD, Collins J., Pereles FS, Carr JC, Eskandari MK, Pearce WH Lower extremity stepping-table magnetic resonance angiography with multilevel contrast timing and segmented contrast infusion. J Vasc Surg. 2003 ; 37 (1). 62-71.
24. Winterer JT, Laubenberger J., Scheffer K., Neumann K., Bayraktarli YR, Allman KH Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective individual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients. J Comp Assist Tomogr. 1999 ; 23 (4). 583-589.
25. Hingorani A., Ascher E., Marks N. Preprocedural imaging: new options to reduce need for contrast angiography. Semin Vasc Surg. 2007 ; 20 (1). 15-28.
26. Kalle TV, Gerlach A., Hatopp A., Klinger S., Prodehl P., Arlat IP Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) in peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD): conventional moving table technique versus hybrid technique. Rofo. 2004 ; 176 (1). 62-69.
27. Low G., Mizzi A., Ong K., Lau PF, McKinstery J. Technical inadequacies of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: incidence, causes and management strategies. Clin Radiol. 2006 ; 61 (11). 937-945.
28. Dorweiler B., Neufang A., Kreitner KF, Schmiedt W., Oelert H. Magnetic resonance angiography unmasks reliable target vessels for pedal bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Vasc Surg. 2002 ; 35 (4). 766-772.
29. Deutschmann HA, Schoellnast H., Portugaller HR, et al. Routine use of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: comparison with selective digital substraction angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006 ; 29 (5). 762-770.
30. Hofmann WJ, Forstner R., Kofler B., Binder K., Ugurluoglu A., Magometschnigg H. Pedal artery imaging-a comparison of selective digital subtraction angiography, contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002 ; 24 (4). 287-292.
31. Lapeyre M., Kobeiter H., Desgranges P., Rahmouni A., Becquemin JP, Luciani A. Assessment of critical limb ischemia in patients with diabetes: comparison of MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. AJR J Roentgenol. 2005 ; 185 (6). 1641-1650.
32. Loewe C., Schoder M., Rand T., et al. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients. AJR J Roentgenol. 2002 ; 179 (4). 1013-1021.
33. Collis R., Burch J., Cranny G., et al. Duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography, and computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease: systematic review. BMJ. 2007 ; 334 (7606). 1257.
34. Wang Y., Truong TN, Yen C., et al. Quantitative evaluation of susceptibility and shielding effects of nitinol, platinum, cobalt-alloy, and stainless-steel stents. Magn Reson Med. 2003 ; 49 (5). 972-976.
35. Hingorani A., Ascher E. Dyless vascular surgery. Cardiovas Surg. 2003 ; 11: 12-18.
36. Grassbaugh JA, Nelson PR, Rzucidlo EM, et al. Blinded comparison of preoperative duplex ultrasound scanning and contrast arteriography for planning revascularización at the level of the tibia. J Vasc Surg. 2003 ; 37 (6). 1186-1190.
37. Shaalan WE, French-Sherry E., Castilla M., Loranski L., Bassiouny HS Reliability of common femoral artery hemodynamics in assessing the severity of aortoiliac inflow disease. J Vasc Surg. 2003 ; 37 (5). 960-969.
38. Wikström J., Johansson L., Karacagil S., Ahlström H. Correlation of femoral artery flow velocity waveform with ipsilateral iliac artery stenoses assessed with magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol. 2007 ; 48 (4). 422-430.
39. Eiberg JP, Jensen F., Gronvall Rasmussen JB, Schoeder TV Screening for aorotoiliac lesions by visual interpretation of the common femoral doppler waveform. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001 ; 22 (4). 331-336.
40. Staffa R., Gregor Z., Vlachovsky R., Vojtisek B., Hofirek I. Pedal bypass grafting on arteriographycally invisible foot arteries detected by duplex ultrasound for limb salvage. Minerva Chir. 2007 ; 62 (2). 115-124.
41. Ascher E., Marks NA, Schutzer RW, Hingorani AP Duplex-assisted internal carotid artery balloon angioplasty and stent placement: a novel approach to minimize or eliminate the use of contrast material. J Vasc Surg. 2005 ; 41 (3). 409-415.
42. Grassbaugh JA, Nelson PR, Rzucidlo EM, et al. Blinded comparison of preoperative duplex ultrasound scanning and contrast arteriography for planning revascularization at the level of the tibia. J Vasc Surg. 2003 ; 37 (6). 1186-1190.
43. Moneta GL, Yeager RA, Antonovic R. Angiography and colour duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of Peripherals ischaemic occlusive arterial disease. Acta Radiol. 1994 ; 35 (3). 270-274.
44. Zeuchner J., Geitung JT, Lukes P., Göthlin JH Angiography and colour flow duplex ultrasonography in the evaluation of peripheral ischaemic occlusive arterial disease. Acta Radiol. 1994 ; 35 (3). 270-274.