Patterns of selection of two North American native and nonnative populations of monkeyflower (Phrymaceae)

New Phytologist

Volumn 183, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 691-701

  Murren, Courtney J ^a   Chang, Cynthia C ^b,c   Dudash, Michele R ^c  

^a School of Business and Economics   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c University of Maryland   (United States)

Author keywords

Floral evolution; Invasive species; Local adaptation; Mating system; Mimulus guttatus (monkeyflower); Plant reproduction; Selection

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; FIELD METHOD; GENETIC VARIATION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MORPHOLOGY; NATIVE SPECIES; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SELECTION;

ARTICLE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MIMULUS; NORTH AMERICA; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

GENETIC VARIATION; MIMULUS; NORTH AMERICA; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION (GENETICS);

NORTH AMERICA;

MIMULUS (ANGIOSPERM); MIMULUS GUTTATUS; PHRYMACEAE;

EID: 67650941446     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02928.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alexander JM, Edwards PJ, Poll M, Parks CG, Dietz H. 2009. Establishment of parallel altitudinal clines in traits of native and introduced forbs. Ecology 90 : 612 622.
2. Arathi HS, Kelly JK. 2004. Corolla morphology facilitates both autogamy and bumblebee pollination in Mimulus guttatus. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 165 : 1039 1045.
3. Baker HG. 1955. Self compatibility and establishment after 'long distance' dispersal. Evolution 11 : 449 460.
4. Barrett SCH, Coulautti RI, Eckert CG. 2008. Plant reproductive systems and evolution during biological invasion. Molecular Ecology 17 : 373 383.
5. Beardsley PM, Olmstead RG. 2002. Redefining Phrymaceae: the placement of Mimulus, tribe Mimuleae, and Phryma. American Journal of Botany 89 : 1093 1102.
6. Beckstead J, Parker IM. 2003. Invasiveness of Ammophila arenaria: release from soil-borne pathogens? Ecology 84 : 2824 2831.
7. Blair AC, Wolfe LM. 2004. The evolution of an invasive plant: an experimental study with Silene latifolia. Ecology 85 : 3035 3042.
8. Blossey B, Notzold R. 1995. Ecology of increased competitive ability in nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology 83 : 887 889.
9. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D. 2005. Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144 : 1 11.
10. Briggs WH, Goldman IL. 2004. Genetic variation and selection response in model breeding populations of Brassica rapa following a diversity bottleneck. Genetics 172 : 456 465.
11. Callahan H, Pigliucci M. 2002. Shade-induced plasticity and its ecological significance in wild populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology 83 : 1965 1980.
12. Caño L, Escarré J, Fleck L, Blanco-Moreno JM, Sans FX. 2008. Increased fitness and plasticity of an invasive in its introduced range: a study using Senecio pterophorus. Journal of Ecology 96 : 468 476.
13. Carr DE, Dudash MR. 1997. The effects of five generations of enforced selfing on potential male and female function in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 51 : 1707 1807.
14. Caruso CM. 2006. Plasticity of inflorescence traits in Lobelia siphilitica (Lobeliaceae) in response to soil water availability. American Journal of Botany 93 : 531 583.
15. Clay K, Levin DA. 1989. Quantitative variation in Phlox - comparison of selfing and outcrossing species. American Journal of Botany 76 : 577 588.
16. Colautti RI, Maron JL, Barrett SCH. 2009. Common garden comparisons of native and introduced plant populations: latitudinal clines can obscure evolutionary inferences. Evolutionary Applications 2 : 187 199.
17. DeWalt SJ, Denslow JS, Ickes K. 2004. Natural-enemy release facilitates habitat expansion of an invasive shrub, Clidemia hirta. Ecology 85 : 471 483.
18. Dole JA. 1992. Reproductive assurance mechanisms in three taxa of the Mimulus guttatus complex (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 79 : 650 659.
19. Donohue K, Messiqua D, Hammond Pyle E, Heschel MS, Schmitt J. 2000. Evidence of adaptive divergence in plasticity: density and site dependent selection on shade avoidance responses in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 54 : 1956 1968.
20. Dudash MR, Carr DE. 1998. Genetics underlying inbreeding depression in Mimulus with contrasting mating systems. Nature 393 : 682 684.
21. Dudash MR, Murren CJ. 2008. The influence of breeding systems and mating systems on conservation genetics and conservation decisions. In : Carroll SC, Fox CW, eds. Evolution in action. Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press, 68 80.
22. Dudash MR, Murren CJ, Carr DE. 2005. Using Mimulus as a model system to understand the role of inbreeding in conservation: genetic and ecological approaches. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 92 : 36 51.
23. Durka W, Bossdorf O, Prati D, Auge H. 2005. Molecular evidence for multiple introductions of invasive garlic mustard (Allaria petiolata, Brassicaceae) to North America. Molecular Ecology 14 : 1697 1706.
24. Endler JA. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton, NJ, USA : Princeton University Press.
25. Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Dudash MR, Thomson J, Wilson P. 2004. Pollination syndromes and the evolution of floral diversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35 : 375 403.
26. Fenster CB, Ritland K. 1994. Evidence for natural selection on mating system in Mimulus (Schrophulariaceae). International Journal of Plant Science 155 : 588 596.
27. Fishman L, Willis J. 2008. Pollen limitation and natural selection on floral characters in the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. New Phytologist 177 : 802 810.
28. Franks SJ, Pratt PD, Dray FA, Simms EL. 2008. Selection of herbivory resistance and growth rate in an invasive plant. American Naturalist 171 : 678 691.
29. Fuller RC, Baer CF, Travis J. 2005. How and when selection experiments might actually be useful. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45 : 391 404.
30. Galloway LF. 1995. Response to natural environmental heterogeneity: maternal effects and selection on life-history characters and plasticities in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 49 : 1095 1107.
31. Gurevitch J, Scheiner SM, Fox GA. 2006. The ecology of plants. Sunderland, MA, USA : Sinauer Association Inc.
32. Hall MC, Willis JH. 2006. Divergent selection on flowering time contributes to local adaptation in Mimulus guttatus populations. Evolution 60 : 2466 2477.
33. Holeski LM, Kelly JK. 2006. Mating system and the evolution of quantitative traits: an experimental study of Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 60 : 711 723.
34. Ivey CT, Carr DE, Eubanks ME. 2004. Effects of inbreeding in Mimulus guttatus on tolerance to herbivory in natural environments. Ecology 85 : 567 574.
35. Jain SK. 1976. The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7 : 469 495.
36. Kalisz S. 1986. Variable selection on the timing of germination in Collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 40 : 479 491.
37. Kelly JK, Holeski LM, Arathi HS. 2008. The genetic correlation between flower size and water use efficiency in monkeyflowers. Evolutionary Ecology Research 10 : 147 152.
38. Kingsolver JG, Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, Hill CE, Hoang A, Gibert P, Beerli P. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist 157 : 245 261.
39. Kingsolver JG, Pfennig DW. 2007. Patterns and power of phenotypic selection in nature. Bioscience 57 : 561 572.
40. van Kleunen M. 2007. Adaptive genetic differentiation in life-history traits between populations of Mimulus guttatus with annual and perennial life cycles. Evolutionary Ecology 21 : 185 199.
41. van Kleunen M, Burczyk J. 2008. Selection on floral traits through male fertility in a natural plant population. Evolutionary Ecology 22 : 39 54.
42. van Kleunen M, Fischer M. 2008. Adaptive rather than nonadaptive evolution of Mimulus guttatus in its invasive range. Basic and Applied Ecology 9 : 213 223.
43. van Kleunen M, Fischer M, Johnson SD. 2007. Reproductive assurance through self-fertilization does not vary with population size in the alien invasive plant Datura stramonium. Oikos 116 : 1400 1412.
44. van Kleunen M, Ritland K. 2004. Predicting evolution of floral traits associated with mating system in a natural plant population. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17 : 1389 1399.
45. Lande R, Arnold SJ. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37 : 1210 1226.
46. Lankinen A, Armbruster WS, Antonsen L. 2007. Delayed stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): genetic variation and adaptive significance in relation to pollen competition, delayed self-pollination and mating-system evolution. American Journal of Botany 94 : 1183 1192.
47. Lavergne S, Molofsky J. 2007. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104 : 3883 3888.
48. Little RC, Milliken GA, Stroup GA, Walter W, Wolfinger RD. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC, USA : SAS Institute Inc.
49. Lynch M, Walsh B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative characters. Sunderland, MA, USA : Sinauer Associates.
50. Maron JL, Elmendorf SC, Vila M. 2007. Contrasting plant physiological adaptation to climate in the native and introduced range of Hypericum perforatum. Evolution 61 : 1912 1924.
51. Mitchell RJ, Ashman T-L. 2008. Predicting evolutionary consequences of pollinator declines: the long and short of floral evolution. New Phytologist 177 : 576 579.
52. Moeller DA, Geber MA. 2005. Ecological context and the evolution of self-pollination on Clarkia xantiana: population size, plant communities, and reproductive assurance. Evolution 59 : 786 799.
53. Murren CJ, Denning W, Pigliucci M. 2005. Relationships between vegetative and life history traits and fitness in a novel field environment: impacts of herbivores. Evolutionary Ecology 19 : 583 601.
54. Murren CJ, Douglass L, Gibson A, Dudash MR. 2006. Individual and combined effects of Ca/Mg ratio and water on trait expression in Mimulus guttatus. Ecology 87 : 2591 2602.
55. Nuñez-Farfan J, Schlichting CD. 2005. Natural selection in Potentilla glandulosa - revisited. Evolutionary Ecology Research 7 : 105 119.
56. Rausher MD. 1992. The measurement of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to the environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46 : 616 626.
57. Rutter MT, Rausher MD. 2004. Natural selection on extrafloral nectar production in Chamaecrista fasciculata: the costs and benefits of a mutualism trait. Evolution 58 : 2657 2668.
58. SAS Institute Inc. 2003. SAS 9.1.3 help and documentation. Cary, NC, USA : SAS Institute, Inc.
59. Schmid-Hempel P, Schmid-Hempel R, Brunner PC, Seeman OD. 2007. Invasion success of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, despite a drastic genetic bottleneck. Heredity 99 : 414 422.
60. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. New York, NY, USA : W. H. Freeman and Co.
61. Stanton ML, Roy BA, Thiede DA. 2000. Evolution in stressful environments. I. Phenotypic variability, phenotypic selection, and response to selection in five distinct environmental stresses. Evolution 54 : 93 111.
62. Stinchcombe JR, Rutter MT, Burdick DS, Tiffin P, Rausher MD, Mauricio R. 2002. Testing for environmentally induced bias in phenotypic estimates of natural selection: theory and practice. American Naturalist 160 : 511 523.
63. Truscott A-M, Palmer SCF, Soulsby C, Hulme PE. 2008. Assessing the vulnerability of riparian vegetation to invasion by Mimulus guttatus: relative importance of biotic and abiotic variables in determining species occurrence and abundance. Diversity and Distributions 14 : 412 421.
64. Vickery RK Jr. 1974. Growth in artificial climates - an indication of Mimulus' ability to invade new habitats. Ecology 55 : 796 807.
65. Vickery RK Jr. 1999. Remarkable waxing, waning, and wandering of population of Mimulus guttatus: an unexpected example of global warming. Great Basin Naturalist 59 : 112 126.
66. Williamson MH. 1996. Biological invasions. London, UK : Chapman and Hall.
67. Willis AJ, Memmott J, Forrester RI. 2000. Is there evidence for the post-invasion evolution of increased size among invasive plant species? Ecology Letters 3 : 275 283.
68. Willis JH. 1996. Measures of phenotypic selection are biased by partial inbreeding. Evolution 50 : 1501 1511.
69. Wolfe LM. 2002. Role of enemies in plant invasions. American Naturalist 160 : 705 711
70. Wolfe LM, Blair AC, Penna BM. 2007. Does intraspecific hybridization contribute to the evolution of invasiveness?: an experimental test. Biological Invasions 9 : 515 521.
71. Wu CA, Lowry DB, Cooley AM, Wright KM, Lee YW, Willis JH. 2008. Mimulus is an emerging model system for the integration of ecological and genomic studies. Heredity 100 : 220 230.