Collinsia sparsiflora in serpentine and nonserpentine habitats: Using F2 hybrids to detect the potential role of selection in ecotypic differentiation

New Phytologist

Volumn 173, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 354-366

  Wright, Jessica W ^a,b   Stanton, Maureen L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecotypic differentiation; Fitness components; Floral traits; Natural selection; Principal components analysis; Serpentine soils

Indexed keywords

CHRYSOTILE;

DICOTYLEDON; DIVERGENCE; ECOTYPE; FITNESS; FLORAL TRAIT; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; HYBRID; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SERPENTINE;

ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; PHENOTYPE; SCROPHULARIACEAE; SOIL;

ASBESTOS, SERPENTINE; ECOSYSTEM; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; SCROPHULARIACEAE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SOIL;

COLLINSIA SPARSIFLORA;

EID: 33845671789     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01925.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Alexandersson R, Johnson SD. 2002. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 269: 631-636.
2. Arnold SJ, Wade MJ. 1984a. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38: 720-734.
3. Arnold SJ, Wade MJ. 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38: 709-719.
4. Ashman T-A. 1994. A dynamic perspective on the physiological cost of reproduction in plants. American Naturalist 144: 300-316.
5. Bradshaw HD. 2005. Mutations in CAX1 produce phenotypes characteristic of plants tolerant to serpentine soils. New Phytologist 167: 81-88.
6. Brady KU, Kruckeberg AR, Bradshaw AD. 2005. Evolutionary ecology of plant adaptation to serpentine soils. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 36: 243-266.
7. Briggs D, Walters SM. 1984. Plant variation and evolution, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Brooks RR. 1987. Serpentine and its vegetation: a multidisciplinary approach. Portland, OR, USA: Dioscorides Press.
9. Chapotin SM, Holbrook NM, Morse SR, Gutierrez MV. 2003. Water relations of tropical dry forest flowers: pathways for water entry and the role of extracellular polysaccharides. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 623-630.
10. Coberly LC, Rausher MD. 2003. Analysis of a chalcone synthase mutant in Ipomoea purpurea reveals a novel function for flavonoids: amelioration of heat stress. Molecular Ecology 12: 1113-1124.
11. Gailing O, Macnair M, Bachmann K. 2004. QTL mapping for a trade-off between leaf and bud production in a recombinant inbred population of Microseris douglasii and M. bigelovii (Asteraceae, Lactuceae): a potential preadaptation for the colonization of serpentine soils. Plant Biology 6:440-446.
12. Galen C. 2000. High and dry: drought stress, sex-allocation trade-offs and selection on flower size in the alpine wildflower Polemonium viscosum (Polemoniaceae). American Naturalist 156: 72-83.
13. Galen C, Sherry RA, Carroll AB. 1999. Are flowers physiological sinks or faucets? Costs and correlates of water use by flowers of Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 118: 461-470.
14. Galen C, Shore JS, Deyoe H. 1991. Ecotypic divergence in alpine Polemonium viscosum: genetic structure, quantitative variation, and local adaptation. Evolution 45: 1218-1228.
15. Harmon GD, Stamp NE. 2002. Relative size early in population development determines reproductive status of individual Erodium cicutarium plants. American Midland Naturalist 147: 32-43.
16. Harrison S. 1999. Native and alien species diversity at the local and regional scales in a grazed California grassland. Oecologia 121: 99-106.
17. Harrison S, Inouye BD. 2002. High beta diversity in the flora of Californian serpentine 'islands'. Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 1869-1876.
18. Hughes R, Bachmann K, Smirnoff N, Macnair M. 2001. The role of drought tolerance in serpentine tolerance in the Mimulus guttatus Fisher ex DC. complex. South African Journal of Science 97: 581-586.
19. Jordan N. 1991. Multivariate analysis of selection in experimental populations derived from hybridization of two ecotypes of the annual plant Diodia teres W. (Rubiaceae). Evolution 45: 1760-1772.
20. Jordan N. 1992. Path-analysis of local adaptation in two ecotypes of the annual plant Diodia teres Walt. (Rubiaceae). American Naturalist 140:149-165.
21. Kalisz S. 1986. Variable selection on the timing of germination in Collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 40: 479-491.
22. Kaplan NL, Hudson RR, Langley CH. 1989. The 'hitchhiking effect' revisited. Genetics 123: 887-899.
23. Kruckeberg AR. 1984. California serpentines: flora, vegetation, geology, soils and management problems. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
24. Lande R, Arnold SJ. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
25. Lexer C, Randell RA, Rieseberg LH. 2003. Experimental hybridization as a tool for studying selection in the wild. Ecology 84: 1688-1699.
26. Littell RC, Miliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute.
27. Lynch M, Walsh B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
28. Macnair M, Gardner M. 1998. The evolution of edaphic endemics. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 157-171.
29. Marak HB, Biere A, Van Damme JMM. 2003. Fitness costs of chemical defense in Plantago lanceolata L.: effects of nutrient and competition stress. Evolution 57: 2519-2530.
30. Maynard Smith J, Haigh J. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genetical Research 23: 23-25.
31. Milberg P, Lamont BB. 1997. Seed/cotyledon size and nutrient content play a major role in early performance of species on nutrient-poor soils. New Phytologist 137: 665-672.
32. Miller TE, Winn AA, Schemske DW. 1994. The effects of density and spatial distribution on selection for emergence time in Prunella vulgaris (Lamiaceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 1-6.
33. Montalvo AM, Ellstrand NC. 2001. Nonlocal transplantation and outbreeding depression in the subshrub Lotus scoparius (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 258-269.
34. Nagy ES. 1997. Selection for native characters in hybrids between two locally adapted plant subspecies. Evolution 51: 1469-1480.
35. Nagy L, Proctor J. 1997. Plant growth and reproduction on a toxic alpine ultramafic soil: adaptation to nutrient limitation. New Phytologist 137:267-274.
36. Nagy ES, Rice KJ. 1997. Local adaptation in two subspecies of an annual plant: Implications for migration and gene flow. Evolution 51: 1079-1089.
37. Nobel PS. 1977. Water relations of flowering of Agave deserti. Botanical Gazette 138: 1-6.
38. Patino S, Grace J. 2002. The cooling of convolvulaceous flowers in a tropical environment. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 41-51.
39. Rajakaruna N, Bradfield GE, Bohm BA, Whitton J. 2003. Adaptive differentiation in response to water stress by edaphic races of Lasthenia californica (Asteraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 371-176.
40. Rausher MD. 1992. The measurement of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46: 616-626.
41. Rice KJ, Dyer AR. 2001. Seed aging, delayed germination and reduced competitive ability in Bromus tectorum. Plant Ecology 155: 237-243.
42. Schemske DW, Bierzychudek P. 2001. Perspective: evolution of flower color in the desert annual Linanthus parryae: Wright revisited. Evolution 55:1269-1282.
43. Schemske DW, Bradshaw JHD. 1999. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 96: 11910-11915.
44. Schoen DJ, Ashman T-A. 1995. The evolution of floral longevity: resource allocation to maintenance versus construction of repeated parts in modular organisms. Evolution 49: 131-139.
45. Stanton ML. 1984. Seed variation in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum): effect of seed size on components of seedling and adult fitness. Ecology 65:1105-1112.
46. Stanton ML. 1985. Seed size and emergence time within a stand of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum): the establishment of a fitness hierarchy. Oecologia (Berlin) 67: 524-531.
47. Stanton ML, Roy BA, Thiede DA. 2000. Evolution in stressful environments, I. Phenotypic variability, phenotypic selection, and response to selection in five distinct environmental stresses. Evolution 54:93-111.
48. Stanton ML, Snow AA, Handel SN. 1986. Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness. Science 232: 1625-1626.
49. Stanton ML, Thiede DA, Roy BA. 2004. Consequences of intraspecific competition and environmental variation for selection in the mustard Sinapsis arvensis: contrasting ecological and evolutionary perspectives. American Naturalist 164: 736-752.
50. Stinchcombe JR, Rutter MT, Burdick DS, Tiffin P, Rausher MD, Mauricio R. 2002. Testing for environmentally induced bias in phenotypic estimates of natural selection: theory and practice. American Naturalist 160: 511-523.
51. Wade MJ, Kalisz S. 1989. The additive partitioning of selection gradients. Evolution 43: 1567-1569.
52. Waser NM, Price MV. 1985. Reciprocal transplant experiments with Delphinium nelsonii (Ranunculaceae): evidence for local adaptation. American Journal of Botany 72: 1726-1732.
53. Whittall JB, Strauss SY. 2006. Non-pollinator agents of selection on floral traits. In: Harder LD, Barrett SCH, eds. Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (In press.)
54. Winn AA, Miller TE. 1995. Effect of density on magnitude of directional selection on seed mass and emergence time in Plantago wrightiana Dcne (Plantaginaceae). Oecologia 103: 365-370.
55. Wright JW, Stanton ML, Scherson R. 2006. Local adaptation to serpentine and non-serpentine soils in Collinsia sparsiflora. Evolutionary Ecology Research 8: 1-21.