Cardiac index measurements by transcutaneous doppler ultrasound and transthoracic echocardiography in adult and pediatric emergency patients

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 237-247

  Nguyen, H Bryant ^a,c   Banta, Daryl P ^c   Stewart, Gail ^b   Kim, Tommy ^b   Bansal, Ramesh ^b   Anholm, James ^c   Wittlake, William A ^a   Corbett, Stephen W ^a  

^a LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac index; Non invasive hemodynamic monitoring; Transcutaneous doppler ultrasound; Transthoracic echocardiography; USCOM 1A

Indexed keywords

CARDIAC INDEXES; NON-INVASIVE HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; TRANSCUTANEOUS; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; USCOM-1A;

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART; HEMODYNAMICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; NON NEWTONIAN FLOW; PATIENT MONITORING; PEDIATRICS; RESUSCITATION; STANDARDS; ULTRASONICS;

MEASUREMENTS;

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; AORTA FLOW; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; EMERGENCY PATIENT; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE; HEART DISEASE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART INDEX; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; INFECTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ADOLESCENT; AGED; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DEVICES; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; HEART OUTPUT; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PROCEDURES; SKIN; VASCULARIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CHILD; COHORT STUDIES; CRITICAL ILLNESS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SKIN; STROKE VOLUME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 77956874886     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-010-9240-6     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Shure D. Pulmonary-artery catheters-peace at last?. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2273-2274.
2. Chaney JC, Derdak S. Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring for the intensivist: Current and emerging technology. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 2338-2345.
3. Knirsch W, Kretschmar O, Tomaske M, et al. Cardiac output measurement in children: Comparison of the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 1060-1064. (Pubitemid 351903792)
4. Wong LS, Yong BH, Young KK, et al. Comparison of the USCOM ultrasound cardiac output monitor with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2008; 14: 1038-1043.
5. Chan JS, Segara D, Nair P. Measurement of cardiac output with a non-invasive continuous wave Doppler device versus the pulmonary artery catheter: A comparative study. Crit Care Resusc 2006; 8: 309-314.
6. van Lelyveld-Haas LE, van Zanten AR, Borm GF, Tjan DH. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25: 917-924.
7. Knobloch K, Tepe J, Lichtinghagen R, Luck HJ, Vogt PM. Simultaneous hemodynamic and serological cardiotoxicity monitoring during immunotherapy with trastuzumab. Int J Cardiol 2008; 125: 113-115.
8. Teoh WH, Sia AT. Colloid preload versus coload for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: The effects on maternal cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 1592-1598.
9. Knobloch K, Hubrich V, Rohmann P, et al. Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by continuous wave Doppler in air rescue service. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2005; 40: 750-755.
10. Gunn SR, Fink MP, Wallace B. Equipment review: The success of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock prompts evaluation of current approaches for monitoring the adequacy of resuscitation. Crit Care 2005; 9: 349-359.
11. Nguyen HB, Losey T, Rasmussen J, et al. Interrater reliability of cardiac output measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound: Implications for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2006; 24: 828-835.
12. Stewart GM, Nguyen HB, Kim TY, Jauregui J, Hayes SR, Corbett S. Inter-rater reliability for noninvasive measurement of cardiac function in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008; 24: 433-437.
13. Dey I, Sprivulis P. Emergency physicians can reliably assess emergency department patient cardiac output using the USCOM continuous wave Doppler cardiac output monitor. Emerg Med Australas 2005; 17: 193-199.
14. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15: 85-91.
15. McGee S, Abernethy WB III, Simel DL. The rational clinical examination. Is this patient hypovolemic?. JAMA 1999; 281: 1022-1029.
16. Schedler O, Handschak H, Hensel M. Non-invasive cardiac output measurement with USCOM in air rescue operation. Ultraschall Med 2008; 29(Suppl 5): 256-259.
17. Knobloch K. Non-invasive determination of stroke volume and cardiac output after high intensity playing exercise in elite female soccer players. Int J Cardiol 2009; 132: 267-269.
18. Corley A, Barnett AG, Mullany D, Fraser JF. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: A prospective observational study. Int J Nurs Stud 2009; 46: 1291-1297.
19. Dark PM, Singer M. The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 2060-2066.
20. Nidorf SM, Picard MH, Triulzi MO, et al. New perspectives in the assessment of cardiac chamber dimensions during development and adulthood. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 983-988.
21. Siu L, Tucker A, Manikappa SK, Monagle J. Does patient position influence Doppler signal quality from the USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor?. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1798-1802.
22. Robson SC, Murray A, Peart I, Heads A, Hunter S. Reproducibility of cardiac output measurement by cross sectional and Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J 1988; 59: 680-684.
23. Yajima T, Nitta M, Nakamura S, et al. Reliability of Doppler echocardiographic stroke volume measurement. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 1992; 39: 55-62.
24. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134: 172-178.
25. Pinsky MR. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 386-388.
26. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121: 2000-2008.
27. Knobloch K, Tepe J, Rossner D, et al. Combined NT-pro- BNP and CW-Doppler ultrasound cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) in epirubicin and liposomal doxorubicin therapy. Int J Cardiol 2008; 128: 316-325.
28. Siu CW, Tse HF, Lee K, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization by ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) device. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007; 30: 50-55.
29. Sturgess DJ, Pascoe RL, Scalia G, Venkatesh B. A comparison of transcutaneous Doppler corrected flow time, b-type natriuretic peptide and central venous pressure as predictors of fluid responsiveness in septic shock: A preliminary evaluation. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 336-341.
30. Trinkmann F, Doesch C, Papavassiliu T, et al. A novel noninvasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: Comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance. Clin Cardiol 2010; 33: E8-E14.
31. Thom O, Taylor DM, Wolfe RE, et al. Comparison of a supra-sternal cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the pulmonary artery catheter. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 800-804.
32. Phillips R, Lichtenthal P, Sloniger J, Burstow D, West M, Copeland J. Noninvasive cardiac output measurement in heart failure subjects on circulatory support. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 881-886.
33. Saur J, Trinkmann F, Weissmann J, Borggrefe M, Kaden JJ. Non-invasive determination of cardiac output: Comparison of a novel CW Doppler ultrasonic technique and inert gas rebreathing. Int J Cardiol 2009; 136: 248-250.
34. Su B, Yu H, Yang M, et al. Reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in recipients of living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2008; 14: 1029-1037.
35. Van den Oever HL, Murphy EJ, Christie-Taylor GA. USCOM (Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitors) lacks agreement with thermodilution cardiac output and transoesophageal echocardiography valve measurements. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007; 35: 903-910.
36. Chand R, Mehta Y, Trehan N. Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2006; 20: 315-319.
37. Tan HL, Pinder M, Parsons R, Roberts B, van Heerden PV. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 287-291.
38. Knobloch K, Lichtenberg A, Winterhalter M, Rossner D, Pichlmaier M, Phillips R. Non-invasive cardiac output determination by two-dimensional independent Doppler during and after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 1479-1483. (Pubitemid 41354141)
39. Critchley LA, Peng ZY, Fok BS, Lee A, Phillips RA. Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 748-753.